Anaerobic co-reduction of chromate and nitrate by bacterial cultures of Staphylococcus epidermidis L-02
- 185 Downloads
Industrial wastewater is often polluted by Cr(VI) compounds, presenting a serious environmental problem. This study addresses the removal of toxic, mutagenic Cr(VI) by means of microbial reduction to Cr(III), which can then be precipitated as oxides or hydroxides and extracted from the aquatic system. A strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis L-02 was isolated from a bacterial consortium used for the remediation of a chromate-contaminated constructed wetland system. This strain reduced Cr(VI) by using pyruvate as an electron donor under anaerobic conditions. The aims of the present study were to investigate the specific rate of Cr(VI) reduction by the strain L-02, the effects of chromate and nitrate (available as electron acceptors) on the strain, and the interference of chromate and nitrate reduction processes. The presence of Cr(VI) decreased the growth rate of the bacterium. Chromate and nitrate reduction did not occur under sterile conditions but was observed during tests with the strain L-02. The presence of nitrate increased both the specific Cr(VI) reduction rate and the cell number. Under denitrifying conditions, Cr(VI) reduction was not inhibited by nitrite, which was produced during nitrate reduction. The average specific rate of chromate reduction reached 4.4 μmol Cr 1010 cells−1 h−1, but was only 2.0 μmol Cr 1010 cells−1 h−1 at 20 °C. The maximum specific rate was as high as 8.8–9.8 μmol Cr 1010 cells−1 h−1. The role of nitrate in chromate reduction is discussed.
KeywordsChromate reduction Nitrate reduction Bacteria Staphylococcus epidermidis
The research was kindly supported by the Linkage NATO grant EST-CLG-978918.
- 1.Bae WC, Kang TG, Kang IK, Won YJ, Jeong BC (2000) Reduction of hexavalent chromium by Escherichia coli ATCC 33456 in batch and continuous cultures. J Microbiol 38:36–39Google Scholar
- 4.Dmitrenko GN, Konovalova VV, Shum OA (2002) The consecution of bacterial Сr(VI) and NO3− at their simultaneous presence in cultivation medium. Khimiya i Vodnaya Tehnologiya 24:578–583 (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 5.Dmitrenko GN, Konovalova VV, Shum OA (2003) The reduction of Cr(VI) by bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas. Mikrobiologiya 72:370–373 (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 11.Gvozdyak PI, Mogilevich NF, Rylsky AF, Grishchenko NI (1986) Reduction of chromium (VI) by collection bacterial strains. Mikrobiologiya 55:962–965 (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 13.Hong J, Sewell GW (1999) Organic electron donors for the microbial Cr(VI) reduction. In: Bioremediation of metals and inorganic compounds. Proceedings of the 5th international in-situ and on-site bioremediation symposium, San Diego, California 135–140Google Scholar
- 19.Muller RF, Goeres D, Sturman P, Sears J (1998). Using microbial dynamics in-situ consortia in hydrocarbon reservoirs for the inhibition of souring. In: Proceedings of the 5th international petroleum environmental conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, pp 1396–1414Google Scholar
- 27.Saxena D, Levin R, Firer MA (2000) Removal of chromate from industrial effluent by a new isolate of Staphylococcus cohnii. Water Sci Technol 42:93–98Google Scholar
- 34.Yagodka SN (1975) A new variant of method of direct count of bacteria in water. Mikrobiologiya 44:169–170 (in Russian)Google Scholar