Advertisement

GPS Solutions

, 22:98 | Cite as

Evaluation and calibration of BeiDou receiver-related pseudorange biases

  • Xiaopeng Gong
  • Yidong Lou
  • Fu Zheng
  • Shengfeng Gu
  • Chuang Shi
  • Jingnan Liu
  • Guifei Jing
Original Article

Abstract

The pseudorange observation of the BeiDou satellite navigation system (BDS) reveals some special errors. Except for the elevation-dependent code bias variations, we present receiver-related code biases of BDS. We have analyzed the BDS receiver-related code biases based on observations from 257 stations whose receivers are from seven different manufacturers. The results demonstrate that BDS code biases are related to receiver manufacturers and receiver models and that they can reach up to about 3.0 ns among different receiver types. Moreover, BDS receiver-related code biases are quite stable over a long period of time. There is no doubt that when mixed receiver types are used, the BDS receiver-related code biases will affect the accuracy of data processing, e.g., satellite differential code bias and satellite clock bias estimation. Thus, to correct BDS receiver-related code biases, correction models for different receiver types are established. Three experiments, including satellite clock estimation, single point positioning (SPP) and pseudorange residual analysis are carried out to validate the corrections proposed. The results prove that, with BDS receiver-related code biases corrected, the biases of satellite clock estimated by mixed receiver types are more consistent with those estimated by the same receiver types. Compared with results without code bias corrections, the average satellite clock bias decreases from 1.04 to 0.22 ns which is an improvement of about 78.8%. Moreover, the accuracy of the ionospheric-free SPP is improved by 7.3 and 10.0% on average in vertical and horizontal components, respectively. The percentage of pseudorange residuals distributed between − 0.5 and 0.5 m is improved from 49.8 to 53.2%.

Keywords

BeiDou Code bias Satellite clock bias SPP 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is partially supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (No. 2016YFB0501802), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41504028). The authors show great gratitudes to IGS, Curtin GNSS Research Centre and Survey and Mapping Office of the Lands Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for providing data.

References

  1. Chen J (1998) An integrated crustal movement monitoring network in China. In: Forsberg R, Feissel M, Dietrich R (eds) Geodesy on the move, vol 119. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Edgar C, Czopek F, Barker B (1999) A co-operative anomaly resolution of PRN-19. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 1999, Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, September 14–17, pp 2269–2268Google Scholar
  3. Geng T, Xie X, Zhao Q, Liu X, Liu J (2017) Improving BDS integer ambiguity resolution using satellite-induced code bias correction for precise orbit determination. GPS Solut 21(3):1191–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gisbert JVP, Batzilis N, Risueño GL, Rubio JA (2012) GNSS payload and signal characterization using a 3 m dish antenna. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2012, Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, September 17–21, pp 347–356Google Scholar
  5. Gong X, Gu S, Lou Y, Zheng F, Ge M, Liu J (2017) An efficient solution of real-time data processing for multi-GNSS network. J Geodesy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1095-x Google Scholar
  6. Gu S, Lou Y, Shi C, Liu J (2015) BeiDou phase bias estimation and its application in precise point positioning with triple-frequency observable. J Geodesy 89(10):979–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hauschild A, Montenbruck O (2016) A study on the dependency of GNSS pseudorange biases on correlator spacing. GPS Solut 20(2):159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hauschild A, Montenbruck O, Sleewaegen JM, Huisman L, Teunissen P (2012) Characterization of compass M-1 signals. GPS Solut 16(1):117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jiang K, Li M, Zhao Q, Li W, Guo X (2017) BeiDou geostationary satellite code bias modeling using Fengyun-3C onboard measurements. Sensors 17(11):2460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lestarquit L, Gregoire Y, Thevenon P (2012) Characterizing the GNSS correlation function using a high gain antenna and long coherent integration—application to signal quality monitoring. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ION PLANS 2012, Myrtle Beach, SC, April 24–26, pp 877–885Google Scholar
  11. Liu J, Ge M (2003) PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 8(2):603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lou Y, Liu Y, Shi C, Yao X, Zheng F (2014) Precise orbit determination of BeiDou constellation based on BETS and MGEX network. Sci Rep 4:4692.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lou Y, Gong X, Gu S, Zheng F, Feng Y (2017) Assessment of code bias variations of BDS triple-frequency signals and their impacts on ambiguity resolution for long baselines. GPS Solut 21(1):177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Khachikyan R, Weber G, Langley RB, Mervart L, Hugentobler U (2013) IGS-MGEX: preparing the ground for multi-constellation GNSS science. In: 4th international colloquium on scientific and fundamental aspects of the Galileo system, 4–6 December 2013, Prague, CZGoogle Scholar
  15. Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Prange L et al (2017) The multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) of the international GNSS service (IGS)—achievements, prospects and challenges. Adv Space Res 59(7):1671–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nadarajah N, Teunissen P, Raziq N (2013) BeiDou inter-satellite-type bias evaluation and calibration for mixed receiver attitude determination. Sensors 13(7):9435–9463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nadarajah N, Teunissen P, Sleewaegen J, Montenbruck O (2015) The mixed-receiver BeiDou inter-satellite-type bias and its impact on RTK positioning. GPS Solut 19(3):357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Odolinski R, Teunissen P, Odijk D (2014) First combined COMPASS/BeiDou-2 and GPS positioning results in Australia. Part II: single- and multiple-frequency single-baseline RTK positioning. J Spat Sci 59(1):25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pini M, Akos D, Esterhuizen S, Mitelman A (2005) Analysis of GNSS signals as observed via a high gain parabolic antenna. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2005, Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, CA, September 13–16, pp. 1686–1695Google Scholar
  20. Shi C, Yi W, Song W, Lou Y, Yao Y, Zhang R (2013) GLONASS pseudorange inter-channel biases and their effects on combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 17(4):439–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shi C, Zheng F, Lou Y, Gu S, Zhang W et al (2017) National BDS augmentation service system (NBASS) of China: progress and assessment. Remote Sens 9(8):837.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shu B, Liu H, Xu L, Gong X, Qian C, Zhang M, Zhang R (2017) Analysis of satellite-induced factors affecting the accuracy of the BDS satellite differential code bias. GPS Solut 21(3):905–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vergara M, Sgammini M, Thoelert S, Enneking C, Zhu Y, Antreich F (2016) Tracking error modeling in presence of satellite imperfections. Navigation 63(1):3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang G, Jong K, Zhao Q, Hu Z, Guo J (2015) Multipath analysis of code measurements for BeiDou geostationary satellites. GPS Solut 19(1):129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wanninger L, Beer S (2015) BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy. GPS Solut 19(4):639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang X, He X (2016) Performance analysis of triple-frequency ambiguity resolution with BeiDou observations. GPS Solut 20(2):269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao Q, Wang G, Liu Z, Hu Z, Dai Z, Liu J (2016) Analysis of BeiDou satellite measurements with code multipath and geometry-free ionosphere-free combinations. Sensors 16:123.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zou X, Li Z, Li M, Tang W, Deng C, Chen L, Wang C, Shi C (2017) Modeling BDS pseudorange variations and models assessment. GPS Solut 21(3):1661–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaopeng Gong
    • 1
  • Yidong Lou
    • 1
  • Fu Zheng
    • 2
  • Shengfeng Gu
    • 1
  • Chuang Shi
    • 2
  • Jingnan Liu
    • 1
  • Guifei Jing
    • 3
  1. 1.GNSS Research CenterWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of Electronic and Information EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.BeiDou Belt and Road SchoolBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations