Performance of GPS and GPS/SINS navigation in the CE-5T1 skip re-entry mission
A CE-5T1 spacecraft completed a high-speed skip re-entry to the earth after a circumlunar flight on October 31, 2014. In addition to the strapdown inertial navigation system (SINS), a lightweight GPS receiver with rapid acquisition was developed as a navigation sensor in the re-entry capsule. The GPS receiver effectively solved the poor accuracy problem of long-term navigation using only the SINS. In contrast to ground users and low-earth-orbit spacecraft, numerous factors, including high altitude and kinetic characteristics in high-speed skip re-entry, are important for GPS positioning feasibility and were presented in accordance with the flight data. GPS solutions started at nearly 4900 km orbital altitude during the phases of re-entry process. These solutions were combined by an inertial measurement unit in a loosely coupled integrated navigation method and SINS navigation initialization. A simplified GPS/SINS navigation filter for limited resources was effectively developed and implemented on board for spacecraft application. Flight data estimation analyses, including trajectory, attitude, position distribution of GPS satellite, and navigation accuracy, were presented. The estimated accuracy of position was better than 42 m, and the accuracy of velocity was better than 0.1 m/s.
KeywordsCE-5T1 Skip re-entry GPS receiver GPS/SINS navigation
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Nos. 61601036 and 61421001.
- Barth A, Mamich H, Hoelscher B (2015) Post-flight analysis of the guidance, navigation, and control performance during Orion exploration flight test 1. AAS 1:15–134Google Scholar
- Bauer FH, Parker JJK, Welch B, Enderle W (2017) Developing a robust, interoperable GNSS space service volume (SSV) for the Global Space User Community. In: Proceedings of ION ITM 2017, Monterey, California, January 30–February 2, p 132–149Google Scholar
- Kamil M, Chobtrong T, Günes E, Haid M (2014) Low-cost object tracking with MEMS sensors, Kalman filtering and simplified two-filter-smoothing. Appl Math Comput 235(4):323–331Google Scholar
- Kaplan ED, Hegarty CJ (2005) Understanding GPS: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Artech House Inc., BostonGoogle Scholar
- Lee T, Long A, Berry K, Carpenter R, Moreau MC, Holt GN (2009) Navigating the return trip from the moon using earth-based ground tracking and GPS. In: 32nd annual AAS guidance and control conference, Colorado, United States, January 30 to February 4Google Scholar
- Long A, Farahmand M, Carpenter R (2015) Navigation operations for the magnetospheric multiscale mission. In: International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, 25th, Munich, Germany, October 19–23, NASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGoogle Scholar
- Manzano-Jurado M, Alegre-Rubio J, Pellacani A, Seco-Granados G, López-Salcedo JA, Guerrero E, García-Rodríguez A (2014) Use of weak GNSS signals in a mission to the moon. In: The 7th ESA workshop on satellite navigation technologies and European workshop on GNSS signals and signal processing (NAVITEC), Noordwijk, The Netherlands, December 3–5, p 1–8Google Scholar
- Wang YL, Gao Y, Wang M (2014) The implementation of rapid acquisition algorithm for GPS weak signal by using FPGA. In: Sun J, Jiao W, Wu H, Lu M (eds) China satellite navigation conference (CSNC) 2014 Proceedings: Volume I. Lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 303. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Zanetti R (2015) Orion exploration flight test-1 (EFT-1) Absolute navigation performance. In: AAS/AIAA astrodynamics specialist conference, Vail, CO, United States, August 9–13Google Scholar