GPS Solutions

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 103–119 | Cite as

Precise relative positioning using real tracking data from COMPASS GEO and IGSO satellites

Original Article


China completed a basic COMPASS navigation network with three Geostationary and three Inclined Geosynchronous satellites in orbit in April 2011. The network has been able to provide preliminary positioning and navigation functions. We first present a quality analysis using 1-week COMPASS measurements collected in Wuhan. Satellite visibility and validity of measurements, carrier-to-noise density ratio and code noise are analyzed. The analysis of multipath combinations shows that the noise level of COMPASS code measurements is higher than that of GPS collected using the same receiver. Second, the results of positioning are presented and analyzed. For the standalone COMPASS solutions, an accuracy of 20 m can be achieved. An accuracy of 3.0 m for the vertical, 1.5 m for the North and about 0.6–0.8 m for the East component is obtained using dual-frequency code only measurements for a short baseline. More importantly, code and phase measurements of the short baseline are processed together to obtain precise relative positioning. Kinematic solutions are then compared with the ground truth. The precision of COMPASS only solutions is better than 2 cm for the North component and 4 cm for the vertical. The standard deviation of the East component is smaller than 1 cm, which is even better than that of the East component of GPS solutions. The accuracy of GPS/COMPASS combination solutions is at least 20 % better than that of GPS alone. Furthermore, the geometry-based residuals of double differenced phase and code measurements are analyzed. The analysis shows that the noise level of un-differenced phase measurements is about 2–4 mm on both B1 and B2 frequencies. For the code measurements, the noise level is less than 0.45 m for B1 CA and about 0.35 m for B2 P code. Many of the COMPASS results presented are very promising and have been obtained for the first time.


COMPASS GEO IGSO Multipath combination Standalone solution Baseline solution COMPASS only solution GPS/COMPASS combination solution Residuals 


  1. Amiri-Simkooei AR, Tiberius CCJM (2007) Assessing receiver noise using GPS short baseline time series. GPS Solut 11(1):21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cao C, Jing G, Luo M (2008a) COMPASS satellite navigation system development. PNT challenges and opportunities symposium, Stanford, California, USA, 5–6 Nov 2008Google Scholar
  3. Cao W, O’Keefe K, Cannon ME (2008b) Evaluation of COMPASS ambiguity resolution performance using geometric-based techniques with comparison to GPS and Galileo. ION GNSS 2008, Session B4, Savannah, Georgia, USA, 16–19 Sept 2008Google Scholar
  4. Chang XW, Yang X, Zhou T (2005) MLAMBDA: a modified LAMBDA method for integer least-squares estimation. J Geodesy 79:552–565. doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0004-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Wilde W, Boon F, Sleewaegen JM, Wilms F (2007) More COMPASS points—tracking China’s MEO satellite on a hardware receiver. Inside GNSS 2(5):44–48Google Scholar
  6. Gao G, Chan A, Lo S, De Lorenzo D, Walter T, Enge P (2009) COMPASS-M1 broadcast codes in E2, E5b and E6 frequency bands. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 3(4):599–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greilier T, Dantepal J, Delatour A, Ghion A, Enge P (2007a) Initial observations and analysis of COMPASS MEO satellite signal. Inside GNSS 2(4):39–43Google Scholar
  8. Greilier T, Ghion A, Dantepal J, Ries L, Delatour A, Avila-Rodriguez JA, Wallner S, Hein GW (2007b) COMPASS signal structure and first measurements. In: Proceedings of the international technical meeting of the institute of navigation, ION-GNSS 2007, 25–28 September, 2007, Fort Worth, TexasGoogle Scholar
  9. Hauschild A, Montenbruck O, Sleewaegen JM, Huisman L, Teunissen PJG (2011) Characterization of COMPASS M-1 signals. GPS Solut. doi:10.1007/s10291-011-0210-3 Google Scholar
  10. Liu Z (2011) A new automated cycle slip detection and repair method for a single dual-frequency GPS receiver. J Geodesy 85(3):171–183. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0426-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu J, Ge M (2003) PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination. J Nat Sci Wuhan Univ 8(2B):603–609, doi:10.1007/BF02899825 Google Scholar
  12. Ran C (2010) COMPASS satellite system development and plan. The first China satellite navigation conference, Beijing, May 19–21, 2010Google Scholar
  13. Septentrio (2010) Septentrio reports frequency spikes in compass M1 satellite signals,
  14. Shi C, Zhao Q, Geng J, Lou Y, Ge M, Liu J (2008) Recent development of PANDA software in GNSS data processing. In: Proceedings of the society of photographic instrumentation engineers, 7285, 72851S, doi:10.1117/12.816261
  15. Teunissen PJG (1993) Least-squares estimation of the integer GPS ambiguities. Invited lecture, Section IV “Theory and methodology”, IAG, Beijing, China, AugustGoogle Scholar
  16. Tiberius C, Kenselaar F (2000) Estimation of the stochastic model for GPS code and phase observables. Surv Rev 35(277):441–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiberius C, Kenselaar F (2003) Variance component estimation and precise GPS positioning: case study. J Surv Eng 129(1):11–18. doi:10.106/(ASCE)0733-9453(2003)129:1(11) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Unicore (2010) Installation and operation user manual: UB240-CORS Beidou/GPS dual-system dual-frequency high precision receiverGoogle Scholar
  19. Verhagen S, Joosten P (2003). Algorithms for design computations for integrated GPS-Galileo. GNSS 2003, The European navigation conference, 22–25 April 2003, Graz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang S, Guo J, Li B, Rizos C (2011). An analysis of satellite visibility and relative positioning precision of COMPASS. In: Symposium for Chinese professionals in GPS, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, 18–20 August, pp 41–46Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GNSS Research CenterWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations