Improved amplitude- and phase-scintillation indices derived from wavelet detrended high-latitude GPS data
- 983 Downloads
Accuracy and validity of scintillation indices estimated using the power and phase of the GPS signal depend heavily on the detrending method used and the selection of the cutoff frequency of the associated filter. A Butterworth filter with a constant cutoff frequency of 0.1 Hz is commonly used in detrending GPS data. In this study, the performance of this commonly used filter is evaluated and compared with a new wavelet-based detrending method using GPS data from high latitudes. It was observed that in detrending high-latitude GPS data, a wavelet filter performed better than Butterworth filters as the correlation between amplitude- and phase-scintillation indices in S 4 and σ ϕ improved significantly from 0.53, when using a Butterworth filter, to 0.79, when using the wavelet filtering method. We also introduced an improved phase-scintillation index, σ CHAIN, which we think is comparatively a better parameter to represent phase scintillations at high latitudes as the correlation between S 4 and σ CHAIN was as high as 0.90. During the analysis, we also noted that the occurrence of the “phase scintillation without amplitude scintillation” phenomenon was significantly reduced when scintillation indices were derived using the wavelet-based detrending method. These results seem to indicate that wavelet-based detrending is better suited for GPS scintillation signals and also that σ CHAIN is a better parameter for representing GPS phase scintillations at high latitudes.
KeywordsPolar ionosphere GPS scintillations Wavelets Phase-scintillation index
Infrastructure funding for CHAIN was provided by the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the New Brunswick Innovation Foundation. CHAIN operations are conducted in collaboration with the Canadian Space Agency. Science funding is provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank C. Torrence for his valuable suggestion in improving our methodology and P. Prikryl for his valuable suggestions in improving the manuscript. Wavelet software was provided by C. Torrence and G. Compo and is available on line at http://atoc.colorado.edu/research/wavelets/.
- Doherty PH, Delay SH, Valladares CE, Klobuchar JA (2000) Ionospheric scintillation effects in the equatorial and auroral regions. Proceedings of ION-GPS 2000, the 13th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 662–671Google Scholar
- Forte B (2007) On the relationship between the geometrical control of scintillation indices and the data detrending problems observed at high latitudes. Ann Geophys 50(6):699–706Google Scholar
- Klobuchar JA (1996) Ionospheric effects on GPS, in Global Positioning System: theory, applications, vol. 2. In: Parkinson BW, Spilker JJ (eds) Progress in astronautics and aeronautics, vol 164. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., Washington, DC, pp 485–516Google Scholar
- Strangeways JH (2009) Determining scintillation effects on GPS receivers. Radio Sci 44: RS0A36. doi: 10.1029/2008RS004076
- Van Dierendonck AJ, Arbesser-Rastburg B (2004) Measuring ionospheric scintillation in the Equatorial region over Africa, including measurements from SBAS geostationary satellite signals. Proceedings of ION GNSS 2004, the 17th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation, Long Beach, California, 316–324Google Scholar
- Van Dierendonck AJ, Klobuchar J, Hua Q (1993) Ionospheric scintillation monitoring using commercial single frequency C/A code receivers. Proceedings of ION GPS-93, the 6th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation Salt Lake City, Utah, pp 333–34Google Scholar
- Wernick AW (1997) Wavelet transform of nonstationary ionospheric scintillation. Acta Geophysica 45(3):237–253Google Scholar