GPS Solutions

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 363–373 | Cite as

Improved amplitude- and phase-scintillation indices derived from wavelet detrended high-latitude GPS data

  • Sajan C. Mushini
  • P. T. Jayachandran
  • R. B. Langley
  • J. W. MacDougall
  • D. Pokhotelov
Original Article

Abstract

Accuracy and validity of scintillation indices estimated using the power and phase of the GPS signal depend heavily on the detrending method used and the selection of the cutoff frequency of the associated filter. A Butterworth filter with a constant cutoff frequency of 0.1 Hz is commonly used in detrending GPS data. In this study, the performance of this commonly used filter is evaluated and compared with a new wavelet-based detrending method using GPS data from high latitudes. It was observed that in detrending high-latitude GPS data, a wavelet filter performed better than Butterworth filters as the correlation between amplitude- and phase-scintillation indices in S 4 and σ ϕ improved significantly from 0.53, when using a Butterworth filter, to 0.79, when using the wavelet filtering method. We also introduced an improved phase-scintillation index, σ CHAIN, which we think is comparatively a better parameter to represent phase scintillations at high latitudes as the correlation between S 4 and σ CHAIN was as high as 0.90. During the analysis, we also noted that the occurrence of the “phase scintillation without amplitude scintillation” phenomenon was significantly reduced when scintillation indices were derived using the wavelet-based detrending method. These results seem to indicate that wavelet-based detrending is better suited for GPS scintillation signals and also that σ CHAIN is a better parameter for representing GPS phase scintillations at high latitudes.

Keywords

Polar ionosphere GPS scintillations Wavelets Phase-scintillation index 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Infrastructure funding for CHAIN was provided by the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the New Brunswick Innovation Foundation. CHAIN operations are conducted in collaboration with the Canadian Space Agency. Science funding is provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank C. Torrence for his valuable suggestion in improving our methodology and P. Prikryl for his valuable suggestions in improving the manuscript. Wavelet software was provided by C. Torrence and G. Compo and is available on line at http://atoc.colorado.edu/research/wavelets/.

References

  1. Banville S, Langley RB, Saito S, Yoshihara T (2010) Handling cycle slips in GPS data during ionospheric plasma bubble events. Radio Sci 45:RS6007. doi: 10.1029/2010RS004415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu S, Mackenzie E, Basu S (1988) Ionospheric constraints on VHF/UHF communication links during solar maximum and minimum periods. Radio Sci 23(3):363–378. doi: 10.1029/RS023i003p00363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beach TL (2006) Perils of the GPS phase scintillation index (σϕ). Radio Sci 41:RS5S31. doi: 10.1029/2005RS003356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya A, Beach TL, Basu S, Kintner PM (2000) Nighttime equatorial ionosphere: GPS scintillations and differential carrier phase fluctuations. Radio Sci 35(1):209–224. doi: 10.1029/1999RS002213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doherty PH, Delay SH, Valladares CE, Klobuchar JA (2000) Ionospheric scintillation effects in the equatorial and auroral regions. Proceedings of ION-GPS 2000, the 13th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 662–671Google Scholar
  6. Forte B (2005) Optimum detrending of raw GPS data for scintillation measurements at auroral latitudes. J Atmos Terr Phys 67(12):1100–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2005.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forte B (2007) On the relationship between the geometrical control of scintillation indices and the data detrending problems observed at high latitudes. Ann Geophys 50(6):699–706Google Scholar
  8. Forte B, Radicella SM (2002) Problems in data treatment for ionospheric scintillation measurements. Radio Sci 37(6):1096. doi: 10.1029/2001RS002508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forte B, Radicella SM (2004) Geometrical control of scintillation indices: what happens for GPS satellites. Radio Sci 39:RS5014. doi: 10.1029/2002RS002852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fremouw EJ (1980) Geometrical control of the ratio of intensity and phase scintillation indices. J Atmos Terr Phys 42(9–10):775–782. doi: 10.1016/0021-9169(80)90080-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fremouw EJ, Leadabrand RL, Livingston RC, Cousins MD, Rino CL, Fair BC, Long RA (1978) Early results from the DNA wideband satellite experiment—complex-signal scintillation. Radio Sci 13(1):167–187. doi: 10.1029/RS013i001p0016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jayachandran PT, Langley RB, MacDougall JW, Mushini SC, Pokhotelov D, Hamza AM, Mann IR, Milling DK, Kale ZC, Chadwick R, Kelly T, Danskin DW, Carrano CS (2009) Canadian high arctic ionospheric network (CHAIN). Radio Sci 44:RS0A03. doi: 10.1029/2008RS004046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kintner PM, Ledvina BM, de Paula ER (2007) GPS and ionospheric scintillations. Space Weather 5:S09003. doi: 10.1029/2006SW000260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klobuchar JA (1996) Ionospheric effects on GPS, in Global Positioning System: theory, applications, vol. 2. In: Parkinson BW, Spilker JJ (eds) Progress in astronautics and aeronautics, vol 164. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., Washington, DC, pp 485–516Google Scholar
  15. Li G, Ning B, Ren Z, Hu L (2010) Statistics of GPS ionospheric scintillation and irregularities over polar regions at solar minimum. GPS Solut 14(4):331–341. doi: 10.1007/s10291-009-0156-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacDougall JW, Jayachandran PT (2001) Polar cap convection relationship with solar wind. Radio Sci 36(6):1869–1880. doi: 10.1029/2001RS001007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDougall JW, Jayachandran PT (2007) Polar patches: auroral zone precipitation effects. J Geophys Res 112:A05312. doi: 10.1029/2006JA011930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Materassi M, Mitchell CN (2007) Wavelet analysis of GPS amplitude scintillation: A case study. Radio Sci 42:RS1004. doi: 10.1029/2005RS003415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Materassi M, Alfonsi L, De Franceschi G, Romano V, Mitchell C, Spalla P (2009) Detrend effect on the scalograms of GPS power scintillation. Adv Space Res 43(11):1740–1748. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2008.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mushini SC, Jayachandran PT, Langley RB, MacDougall JW (2009) Use of varying shell heights derived from ionosonde data in calculating vertical total electron content (TEC) using GPS—new method. Advances in Space Research 44(11):1309–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2009.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strangeways JH (2009) Determining scintillation effects on GPS receivers. Radio Sci 44: RS0A36. doi: 10.1029/2008RS004076
  22. Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A Practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(1):61–78. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<1019:NDSFS>2.3.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Dierendonck AJ, Arbesser-Rastburg B (2004) Measuring ionospheric scintillation in the Equatorial region over Africa, including measurements from SBAS geostationary satellite signals. Proceedings of ION GNSS 2004, the 17th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation, Long Beach, California, 316–324Google Scholar
  24. Van Dierendonck AJ, Klobuchar J, Hua Q (1993) Ionospheric scintillation monitoring using commercial single frequency C/A code receivers. Proceedings of ION GPS-93, the 6th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation Salt Lake City, Utah, pp 333–34Google Scholar
  25. Wernick AW (1997) Wavelet transform of nonstationary ionospheric scintillation. Acta Geophysica 45(3):237–253Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sajan C. Mushini
    • 1
  • P. T. Jayachandran
    • 1
  • R. B. Langley
    • 2
  • J. W. MacDougall
    • 3
  • D. Pokhotelov
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Geodesy and Geomatics EngineeringUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  4. 4.Arctic Research UnitFinnish Meteorological InstituteHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations