Precise GRACE baseline determination using GPS
- 763 Downloads
- 73 Citations
Abstract
Precision relative navigation is an essential aspect of spacecraft formation flying missions, both from an operational and a scientific point of view. When using GPS as a relative distance sensor, dual-frequency receivers are required for high accuracy at large inter-satellite separations. This allows for a correction of the relative ionospheric path delay and enables double difference integer ambiguity resolution. Although kinematic relative positioning techniques demonstrate promising results for hardware-in-the-loop simulations, they were found to lack an adequate robustness in real-world applications. To overcome this limitation, an extended Kalman Filter modeling the relative spacecraft dynamics has been developed. The filter processes single difference GPS pseudorange and carrier phase observations to estimate the relative position and velocity along with empirical accelerations and carrier phase ambiguities. In parallel, double difference carrier phase ambiguities are resolved on both frequencies using the least square ambiguity decorrelation adjustment (LAMBDA) method in order to fully exploit the inherent measurement accuracy. The combination of reduced dynamic filtering with the LAMBDA method results in smooth relative position estimates as well as fast and reliable ambiguity resolution. The proposed method has been validated with data from the gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) mission. For an 11-day data arc, the resulting solution matches the GRACE K-Band Ranging System measurements with an accuracy of 1 mm, whereby 83% of the double difference ambiguities are resolved.
Keywords
Spacecraft formation flying Relative positioning GRACE Integer ambiguity resolutionReferences
- Bierman GJ (1977) Factorization methods for discrete sequential estimation. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Binning PW (1997) Absolute and relative satellite to satellite navigation using GPS. PhD Dissertation, University of ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- Case K, Kruizinga G, Wu S (2002) GRACE level 1B data product user handbook, JPL Publication D-22027Google Scholar
- Ebinuma T (2001) Precision spacecraft rendezvous using GPS: an integrated hardware approach, PhD Dissertation, University of TexasGoogle Scholar
- Gill E, Montenbruck O (2004) Comparison of GPS based orbit determination strategies. In: 18th international symposium on space flight dynamics, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Kroes R, Montenbruck O (2004) Spacecraft formation flying: relative positioning using dual frequency carrier phase. GPS World (July 2004):37–42Google Scholar
- Leung S, Montenbruck O (2004) Real-time navigation of formation flying spacecraft using GPS measurements. J Guidance Control Dyn (in press)Google Scholar
- Lichten SM (1990) Estimation and filtering for high-precision GPS positioning applications. Manus Geod 15:159–176Google Scholar
- Montenbruck O, Gill E (2000) Satellite orbits: models, methods, and applications, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Moreira A (2003) TanDEM-X: A TerraSAR-X Add-On for digital elevation measurements, proposal study, DLR Doc. No. 2003-3472739Google Scholar
- Moreira A, Krieger G, Hajnsek I (2004) TanDEM-X: A TerraSAR-X Add-On Satellite for Single-Pass SAR Interferometry. In: International geoscience and remote sensing symposiumGoogle Scholar
- NASA (2003) Studying the earth’s gravity from space: the gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE), NASA Facts, Doc. No. FS-2002-1-029-GSFCGoogle Scholar
- Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Ries JC, Thompson PF, Watkins M (2004) GRACE measurements of mass variability in the earth system. Science 305(5683):503–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geod 70:65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Teunissen PJG (1998) Success probability of integer ambiguity rounding and bootstrapping. J Geod 72:606–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Verhagen S (2004) Integer ambiguity validation: an open problem?, GPS Solutions 8:36–43. DOI 10.1007/s10291-004-0087-5Google Scholar