GPS Solutions

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 36–43 | Cite as

Integer ambiguity validation: an open problem?

  • Sandra VerhagenEmail author
Original Article


The problem of integer estimation has drawn a lot of attention in the past decade, and is now often considered solved. However, a parameter resolution theory cannot be considered complete without rigorous measures for validating the parameter solution.


Ambiguity Resolution Fixed Solution Ambiguity Estimator Float Solution Correct Acceptance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abidin HA (1993) Computational and geometrical aspects of on-the-fly ambiguity resolution. PhD Thesis, Dept of Surveying Engineering, Technical Report no 104, University of New Brunswick, Canada, 314 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen Y (1997) An approach to validate the resolved ambiguities in GPS rapid positioning. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics and Navigation, Banff, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  3. Euler HJ, Schaffrin B (1991) On a measure for the discernability between different ambiguity solutions in the static-kinematic GPS-mode. IAG Symposia no 107, Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Surveying, and Remote Sensing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 285–295Google Scholar
  4. Frei E, Beutler G (1990) Rapid static positioning based on the fast ambiguity resolution approach FARA: theory and first results. Manuscript Geod 15:325–356Google Scholar
  5. Han S (1997) Quality-control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning. J Geod 71:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Han S, Rizos C (1996) Validation and rejection criteria for integer least-squares estimation. Surv Rev 33(260):375–382Google Scholar
  7. Landau H, Euler HJ (1992) On-the-fly ambiguity resolution for precise differential positioning. Proceedings of the ION GPS-1992, Albuquerque, New Mexico, pp 607–613Google Scholar
  8. Teunissen PJG (1993) Least squares estimation of the integer GPS ambiguities. Invited lecture, Section IV: theory and methodology. IAG General Meeting, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  9. Teunissen PJG (1999) An optimality property of the integer least-squares estimator. J Geod 73:587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Teunissen PJG (2002) The parameter distributions of the integer GPS model. J Geod 76:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Teunissen PJG (2003a) A carrier phase ambiguity estimator with easy-to-evaluate fail-rate. Artificial Satellites 38(3):89–96Google Scholar
  12. Teunissen PJG (2003b) Integer aperture GNSS ambiguity resolution. Artificial Satellites 38(3):79–88Google Scholar
  13. Teunissen PJG (2003c) Theory of integer aperture estimation with application to GNSS. MGP-report, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Teunissen PJG, Kleusberg A (1998) GPS for geodesy, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Tiberius CCJM, de Jonge PJ (1995) Fast positioning using the LAMBDA method. Proceedings of DSNS-95, no 30Google Scholar
  16. Verhagen S, Teunissen PJG (2003) PDF evaluation of the ambiguity residuals. In: Proceedings of V Hotine-Marussi Symposium, 17–21 June 2002, Matera, Italy (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Wang J, Stewart M, Tsakiri M (1998) A discrimination test procedure for ambiguity resolution on-the-fly. J Geod 72:644–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematical Geodesy and PositioningDelft University of Technology2629 HS DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations