Review of World Economics

, Volume 153, Issue 2, pp 327–351 | Cite as

Explaining the size differences of exporter premia: theory and evidence

  • Ingo Geishecker
  • Philipp J. H. Schröder
  • Allan Sørensen
Original Paper
  • 171 Downloads

Abstract

Two decades of research have established pronounced exporter productivity premia (EPP) and exporter size premia (ESP). Yet, we do not know why such exporter premia differ so widely in magnitude across countries or sectors? We take this question to the theory and to the data. We derive the sectoral EPP and ESP in a standard heterogeneous firms trade model and apply the insights from the model to guide our empirical investigation of detailed Danish firm-level data. We show that a significant share of the observed variation in EPP and ESP across sectors can be accounted for by sector differences in the underlying variation in productivity dispersion, variable trade costs, the ratio of fixed export costs to fixed costs of production, and the elasticity of demand.

Keywords

Intra-industry trade Exporter productivity Exporter size premium Firm-level data Heterogeneous firms 

JEL Classification

F12 F14 D24 O47 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The paper benefited from the comments of Andrew Bernard, Gabriel Felbermayr, Benjamin Jung and Giammario Impullitti. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Tuborg Foundation.

Supplementary material

10290_2016_266_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (88 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 87 KB)
10290_2016_266_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (147 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (pdf 146 KB)
10290_2016_266_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (68 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (pdf 68 KB)
10290_2016_266_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (90 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (pdf 89 KB)

References

  1. Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., & Frazer, G. (2006). Structural identification of production functions. (MPRA Discussion Paper 38349). Germany: Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper from University Library of MunichGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., & Frazer, G. (2015). Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica, 83(6), 2411–2451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aw, B. Y., & Hwang, A. R. (1995). Productivity and the export market: a firm-level analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 47, 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Békés, G., & Muraközy, B. (2012). Temporary trade and heterogeneous firms. Journal of International Economics, 81, 232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellone, F., Kiyota, K., Matsuura, T., Musso, P., & Nesta, L. (2014). International productivity gaps and the export status of firms: evidence from France and Japan. European Economic Review, 70, 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review, 93, 1268–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2012). The empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Loecker, J. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Loecker, J. (2013). Detecting learning by exporting. American Economic Journal Microeconomics, 5(3), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Comite, F., Thisse, J.-F., & Vandenbussche, H. (2014). Verti-zontal differentiation in export markets. Journal of International Economics, 93(1), 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297–308.Google Scholar
  13. Eckel, C., Iacovone, L., Javorcik, B., & Neary, P. (2016) Testing the core competency model of multi-product firms, forthcoming: Review of International Economics.Google Scholar
  14. Eckel, C., & Neary, P. (2010). Multi-product firms and flexible manufacturing in the global economy. Review of Economic Studies, 77(1), 188–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farinas, J. C., & Martin-Marcos, A. (2007). Exporting and economic performance: Firm-level evidence of spanish manufacturing. World Economy, 30, 618–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenaway, D., & Kneller, R. (2007). Exporting and foreign direct investment, firm heterogeneity. The Economic Journal, 117, 134–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayakawa, K., Machikita, T., & Kimura, F. (2012). Globalization and productivity: A survey of firm-level analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2), 332–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94, 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ISGEP - International Study Group on Exports and Productivity. (2008). ‘Understanding cross-country differences in export premia: Comparable evidence for 14 countries. Review of World Economics, 144, 596–635.Google Scholar
  20. Kneller, R., & Pisu, M. (2010). The returns to exporting: Evidence from UK firms. Canadian Journal of Economics, 43(2), 494–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lawless, M. (2009). Firm export dynamics and the geography of trade. Journal of International Economics, 77, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luttmer, E. G. (2007). Selection, growth, and the size distribution of firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1103–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manova, K., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Export prices across firms and destinations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 379–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marin, A.G., & Voigtländer, N. (2013). Exporting and plant-level efficiency gains: It’s in the measure. NBER Working Paper 19033.Google Scholar
  25. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merino, F. (2004). ‘Firms’ productivity and internationalization: A statistical dominance test. Applied Economics Letters, 11, 851–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mrázová, M., Neary, P., & Parenti, M. (2015). Technology, demand, and the size distribution of firms. Conference Paper. Danish International Economics Workshop, Aarhus University. Accessed on April 16th–17th, 2015.Google Scholar
  28. Powell, D., & Wagner, J. (2014). The exporter productivity premium along the productivity distribution: Evidence from quantile regression with nonadditive firm fixed effects. Review of World Economics, 150(4), 763–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Redding, S. J. (2011). Theories of heterogeneous firms and trade. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schröder, P. J. H., & Sørensen, A. (2012). Second thoughts on the exporter productivity premium. Canadian Journal of Economics, 45(4), 1310–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Syverson, C. (2011). What determines productivity. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vinzenzo, V., & Wagner, J. (2011). Robust estimation of linear fixed effects panel data models with an application to the exporter productivity premium. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 231(4), 546–557.Google Scholar
  33. Wagner, J. (2007). Exports and productivity: A survey of the evidence from firm-level data. The World Economy, 30, 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wagner, J. (2012). International trade and firm performance: A survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics, 148(2), 235–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingo Geishecker
    • 1
    • 2
  • Philipp J. H. Schröder
    • 2
    • 3
  • Allan Sørensen
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Business Administration and EconomicsEuropean University ViadrinaFrankfurt (Oder)Germany
  2. 2.Tuborg Research Centre for Globalisation and FirmsAarhusDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Economics and Business Economics, School of Business and Social SciencesAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations