Advertisement

Review of World Economics

, Volume 151, Issue 1, pp 53–72 | Cite as

Trade and technology: new evidence on the productivity sorting of firms

  • Irene BertschekEmail author
  • Jan Hogrefe
  • Fabienne Rasel
Original Paper

Abstract

Recent advances in trade theory suggest novel gains from trade liberalisation through technology adoption by expanding exporting firms. These theories rely on strict assumptions regarding the productivity sorting of firms with different technology use. In this paper, we test the sorting of German firms using data on actually implemented technologies. Our analysis distinguishes between manufacturing and service industries. In case of the former, we confirm the sorting pattern of the most productive firms being high-tech exporters, followed by low-tech exporters and then domestic low-tech firms. For services, the evidence is mixed and potentially depends on the tradability of the considered services.

Keywords

Exports Productivity Sorting Information technology Firm-level data 

JEL Classification

F14 F23 F61 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge support by the ZEW research programme Strengthening Efficiency and Competitiveness of the European Knowledge Economies (SEEK), financed by the state of Baden-Württemberg. We thank the participants of the corresponding SEEK workshop in Mannheim, the European Trade Study Group conference 2012 in Leuven, the PhD seminar in Industrial Organization at the University of Mannheim, the 9th International Economics Workshop in Aarhus and an anonymous referee for constructive discussions. James Binfield provided helpful research assistance. For further projects of the authors see www.zew.de/staff_ibe, www.zew.de/staff_jhf and www.zew.de/staff_frl as well as the ZEW annual report under www.zew.de.

References

  1. Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., & Wu, D. (2006). Which came first, IT or productivity? The virtuous cycle of investment and use in enterprise systems. Twenty seventh international conference on information systems, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bresnahan, T., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (2002). Information technologies, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bustos, P. (2011). Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: Evidence on the impact of mercosur on Argentinian firms. American Economic Review, 101(1), 304–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engelstätter, B. (2012). It’s not all about performance gains—enterprise software and innovations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(3), 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huber, P. J. (1964). Robust estimation of a location parameter. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35(1), 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kohler, W., & Smolka, M. (2012). Global sourcing decisions and firm productivity: Evidence from Spain. In R. Stern (Ed.), Quantitative analysis of newly evolving patterns of international trade: Fragmentation; offshoring of activities; and vertical intra-industry trade, (chapt 4, pp. 139–189). World Scientific Studies in International Economics.Google Scholar
  8. Lileeva, A., & Trefler, D. (2010). Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity... for some plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1051–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocation and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Melitz, M., & Trefler, D. (2012). Gains from trade when firms matter. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(2), 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rousseeuw, P. J., & Leroy, A. M. (2005). Robust regression and outlier detection (Vol. 589). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Verardi, V., & Croux, C. (2009). Robust regression in stata. Stata Journal, 9(3), 439–453.Google Scholar
  13. Verardi, V., & Wagner, J. (2012). Productivity premia for German manufacturing firms exporting to the euro-area and beyond: First evidence from robust fixed effects estimations. The World Economy, 35(6), 694–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vogel, A., & Wagner, J. (2011). Robust estimates of exporter productivity premia in German business services enterprises. Economic & Business Review, 13(1–2), 7–26.Google Scholar
  15. Vogel, A., & Wagner, J. (2013). Exports, R&D and productivity in German business services firms: A test of the Bustos-model. Empirical Economics Letters, 12(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  16. Wagner, J. (2012). Exports, R&D and productivity: A test of the Bustos-model with German enterprise data. Economics Bulletin, 32(3), 1942–1948.Google Scholar
  17. ZEW (2010). IKT-Report. Unternehmensbefragung zur Nutzung von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien. Available at http://www.zew.de/en/forschung/projekte.php3?action=detail&nr=328&abt=ikt

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene Bertschek
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jan Hogrefe
    • 1
  • Fabienne Rasel
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW)MannheimGermany
  2. 2.University of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations