Impact of institutions on cross-border price dispersion
- 248 Downloads
This paper analyzes the role of institutions in price dispersion among cities in the European region in the 1996–2009 period. An overview of the literature on the border effect reveals that the role of institutions is completely neglected. Using the Worldwide Governance Indicators as explanatory variables I find that the better the institutions, the lower the predicted dispersion. The result is robust to different specifications of the regression model and it is consistent with a hypothesis that arbitrage, as an entrepreneurial activity and the main power behind the law of one price, is influenced by institutional quality.
KeywordsBorder effect Price dispersion Price convergence Law of one price Institutional quality
JEL ClassificationD23 E31 F41 L26
I would like to thank Štěpán Jurajda, Michal Bauer, and seminar participants at Charles University for their helpful comments.
- Aidis, R., & Estrin, S. (2006). Institutions, networks and entrepreneurship development in Russia: an exploration. WDI Working Papers 833. University of Michigan: William Davidson Institute.Google Scholar
- Allington, N. F. B., Kattuman, P. A., & Waldmann, F. A. (2005). One market, one money, one price? International Journal of Central Banking, 1(3), 73–115.Google Scholar
- Baumol, W. J., Litan, R. E., & Schramm, C. J. (2007). Good capitalism, bad capitalism, and the economics of growth and prosperity (1st ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Broda, C., & Weinstein, D. E. (2008). Understanding International price differences using barcode data. NBER Working Paper 14017. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Crucini, M. J., Shintani, M., & Tsuruga, T. (2008). Accounting for persistence and volatility of good-level real exchange rates: The role of sticky information. NBER Working Paper 14381. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Engel, C., & Rogers, J. H. (1996). How wide is the border? American Economic Review, 86(5), 1112–1125.Google Scholar
- Engel, C., Rogers, J. H., & Wang, S.-Y. (2003). Revisiting the border: An assessment of the law of one price using very disaggregated consumer price data. International Finance Discussion Papers 777. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar
- Gopinath, G., Gourinchas, P.-O., Hsieh, C.-T., & Li, N. (2009). Estimating the border effect: Some new evidence. CEPR Discussion Paper 7281. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
- Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2002). Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. CEPII Discussion Paper 02-01. Paris: Centre d’Études Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales.Google Scholar
- Imbs, J., Mumtaz, H., Ravn, M. O., & Rey, H. (2005). PPP strikes back: Aggregation and the real exchange rate. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 1–43.Google Scholar
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Policy Research Working Paper 5430. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85.Google Scholar
- McCallum, J. (1995). National borders matter: Canada-U.S. regional trade patterns. American Economic Review, 85(3), 615–623.Google Scholar
- Rogers, J. H. (2002). Monetary union, price level convergence, and inflation: How close is Europe to the United States? International Finance Discussion Papers 740. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar
- Rogoff, K. (1996). The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 647–668.Google Scholar
- Wei, S.-J. (1996). Intra-national versus international trade: How stubborn are nations in global integration? NBER Working Paper 5531. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Wu, J., & Huang, S. (2006). The entrepreneurship and institutions: A perspective to interpret China’s economic growth in its transformation. American Economic Association Meeting—William Baumol Special Session on Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Growth III: International Approach. Retrieved from http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2006/0108_1015_0203.pdf.