Review of World Economics

, Volume 146, Issue 2, pp 241–261

Rose effect and the euro: is the magic gone?

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper presents an updated meta-analysis of the effect of currency unions on trade, focusing on the euro area. Using meta-regression methods such as the funnel asymmetry test, evidence for strong publication bias is found. The estimated underlying effect for currency unions other than the eurozone reaches more than 60%. However, according to the meta-regression analysis, the euro’s trade promoting effect corrected for publication bias is insignificant. The Rose effect literature shows signs of the economics research cycle: reported t-statistic is a quadratic concave function of the publication year. Explanatory meta-regression (robust fixed effects and random effects), that can explain about 70% of the heterogeneity in the literature, suggests that results published by some authors might consistently differ from the mainstream output and that study outcomes are systematically dependent on study design (usage of panel data, short- or long-run nature, number of countries in the data set).

Keywords

Rose effect Trade Currency union Euro Meta-analysis Publication bias 

JEL Classification

C42 F15 F33 

References

  1. Abreu, M., de Groot, H. L. F., & Florax, R. J. G. M. (2005). A meta-analysis of β-convergence: The legendary 2%. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 389–420.Google Scholar
  2. Adam, C., & Cobham, D. (2007). Exchange rate regimes and trade. Manchester School, 75(1), 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Barro, R. J., & Tenreyro, S. (2003). Optimal currency areas. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 17, 301–345.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotelous, K. (2006). Are there differences across countries regarding the effect of currency unions on trade? Evidence from EMU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashenfelter, O., Harmon, C., & Oosterbeek, H. (1999). A review of estimates of the schooling/earnings relationship, with tests for publication bias. Labour Economics, 6(4), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin, R. (2006). The euro’s trade effect. (Working Paper Series 594). Frankfurt a.M.: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, R., & di Nino, V. (2006). Euros and zeros: The common currency effect on trade in new goods. (NBER Working Paper 12673). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  8. Baldwin, R., di Nino, V., Fontagé, L., de Santis, R. A., & Taglioni, D. (2008). Study on the impact of the euro on trade and foreign direct investment. (Economic Papers 321). Brussels: Office for Infrastructures and Logistics.Google Scholar
  9. Baldwin, R., & Taglioni, D. (2004). Positive OCA criteria: Microfoundations for the Rose effect. Technical report, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva.Google Scholar
  10. Baldwin, R., & Taglioni, D. (2006). Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. (NBER Working Paper 12516). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  11. Barr, D., Breedon, F., & Miles, D. (2003). Life on the outside: Economic conditions and prospects outside Euroland. Economic Policy, 18(37), 573–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barro, R., & Tenreyro, S. (2007). Economic effects of currency unions. Economic Inquiry, 45(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baxter, M., & Kouparitsas, M. A. (2006). What determines bilateral trade flows? (NBER Working Paper 12188). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  14. Berger, H., & Nitsch, V. (2008). Zooming out: The trade effect of the euro in historical perspective. Journal of International Money and Finance, 27(8), 1244–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bomberger, W. (2002). Decolonization and estimates of the time series effect of currency unions. Technical report, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  16. Borenstein, M., Rothstein, H. R., Hedges, L. V., & Higgins, J. P. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bowland, B. J., & Beghin, J. C. (2001). Robust estimates of value of a statistical life for developing economies. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23(4), 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brouwer, J., Paap, R., & Viane, J.-M. (2008). The trade and FDI effects of EMU enlargement. Journal of International Money and Finance, 27, 188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bun, M. J., & Klaassen, F. J. (2002). Has the euro increased trade? (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 02-108/2). Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Bun, M. J., & Klaassen, F. J. (2007). The euro effect on trade is not as large as commonly thought. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cabasson, D. (2003). Survey about monetary unions. Technical report, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Cafiso, G. (2008). The euro’s influence upon trade—rose effect versus border effect. (Working Paper Series 941). Frankfurt a.M.: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  23. Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Time-series minimum-wage studies: A meta-analysis. American Economic Review, 85(2), 238–243.Google Scholar
  24. Chintrakarn, P. (2008). Estimating the euro effects on trade with propensity score matching. Review of International Economics, 16(1), 186–198.Google Scholar
  25. de Nardis, S., de Santis, R., & Vicarelli, C. (2008). The Single Currency’s effects on eurozone sectoral trade: Winners and losers? Economics—The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 2, 2008-17. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2008-17.
  26. de Nardis, S., & Vicarelli, C. (2003a). Currency union and trade: The special case of EMU. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 139(4), 625–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Nardis, S., & Vicarelli, C. (2003b). The impact of euro on trade: The (early) effect is not so large. (ISAE Working Paper 31). Rome: Institute for Studies and Economic Analyses.Google Scholar
  28. de Sousa, J., & Lochard, J. (2003). Do currency unions solve the border effect puzzle? Technical report, University of Paris.Google Scholar
  29. de Sousa, J., & Lochard, J. (2007). The currency union effect on trade and the FDI channel. Cahiers de la maison des sciences economiques, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).Google Scholar
  30. de Souza, L. V. (2002). Trade effects of monetary integration in large, mature economies: A primer on the European monetary union. (Kiel Working Paper 1137). Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.Google Scholar
  31. Doucouliagos, C., & Stanley, T. D. (2009). Publication selection bias in minimum-wage research? A meta-regression analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(2), 406–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Scheider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 316, 629–634.Google Scholar
  33. Estevadeordal, A., Frantz, B., & Taylor, A. M. (2003). The rise and fall of world trade, 1870–1939. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 359–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Faruqee, H. (2004). Measuring the trade effects of EMU. (IMF Working Paper 04/154). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  35. Flam, H., & Nordström, H. (2006a). Euro effects on the intensive and extensive margins of trade. (Working Paper 1881). Munich: CESifo.Google Scholar
  36. Flam, H., & Nordström, H. (2006b). Trade volume effects of the Euro: Aggregate and sector estimates. (Seminar Paper 746). Stockholm: Stockholm University, Institute for International Economic Studies.Google Scholar
  37. Flandreau, M., & Maurel, M. (2005). Monetary union, trade integration, & business cycles in 19th Century Europe. Open Economies Review, 16(2), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frankel, J. (2006). Comments on Baldwin (2006) ‘The euro’s trade effect’. (Working Paper Series 594). Frankfurt a.M.: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  39. Frankel, J. (2008a). The estimated effects of the euro on trade: Why are they below historical effects of monetary unions among smaller countries? (NBER Working Paper 14542). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  40. Frankel, J. A. (2008b). Should Eastern European Countries join the euro? A review and update of trade estimates and consideration of endogenous OCA criteria. (Working Paper Series RWP08-059). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.Google Scholar
  41. Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. (2002). An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 437–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Galbraith, R. F. (1988). A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 7, 889–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Glick, R., & Rose, A. K. (2002). Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence. European Economic Review, 46(6), 1125–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goldfarb, R. S. (1995). The economist-as-audience needs a methodology of plausible inference. Journal of Economic Methodology, 2(2), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gomes, T., Graham, C., Helliwell, J., Kano, T., Murray, J., & Schembri, L. (2006). The euro and trade: Is there a positive effect? Technical report, Bank of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  46. Görg, H., & Greenaway, D. (2004). Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? World Bank Research Observer, 19(2), 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hamilton, L. C. (2006). Statistics with STATA. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  48. Honohan, P. (2001). Discussion of Rose (2001) ‘Currency unions and trade: The effect is large’. Economic Policy, 33, 457–461.Google Scholar
  49. Kenen, P. B. (2002). Currency unions and trade: Variations on themes by Rose and Persson. (Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper Series 2002/08). Wellington: Reserve Bank of New Zealand.Google Scholar
  50. Klein, M. W. (2005). Dollarization and trade. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(6), 935–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Knapp, G., & Hartung, J. (2003). Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 2693–2710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Koetse, M. J., Florax, R., & Groot, H. D. (2010). Consequences of effect size heterogeneity for meta-analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Statistical Methods and Applications, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  53. Krassoi-Peach, E., & Stanley, T. (2009). Efficiency wages, productivity and simultaneity: A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Labor Research, 30(3), 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Krueger, A. B. (2003). Economic considerations and class size. Economic Journal, 113(485), 34–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Levi Yeyati, E. (2003). On the impact of a common currency on bilateral trade. Economics Letters, 79(1), 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lopéz-Córdova, J. E., & Meissner, C. M. (2003). Exchange-rate regimes and international trade: Evidence from the classical gold standard era. American Economic Review, 93(1), 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Masson, P. R. (2008). Currency unions in Africa: Is the trade effect substantial enough to justify their formation? The World Economy, 31(4), 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McKenzie, M. D. (1999). The impact of exchange rate volatility on international trade flows. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(1), 71–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Micco, A., Stein, E., & Ordonez, G. (2003). The currency union effect on trade: Early evidence from EMU. Economic Policy, 18(37), 315–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mélitz, J. (2001). Geography, trade and currency union. (CEPR Discussion Papers 2987). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  61. Mélitz, J. (2008). Language and foreign trade. European Economic Review, 52(4), 667–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nitsch, V. (2002a). Comparing apples and oranges: The trade effect of multilateral currency unions is small. Technical report, Bankgesellschaft Berlin.Google Scholar
  63. Nitsch, V. (2002b). Honey, I shrunk the currency union effect on trade. The World Economy, 25(4), 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pakko, M. R., & Wall, H. J. (2001). Reconsidering the trade-creating effects of a currency union. FRB St. Louis Review, 83, 37–46.Google Scholar
  65. Persson, T. (2001). Currency unions and trade: How large is the treatment effect? Economic Policy, 16(33), 433–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  67. Rose, A. K. (2000). One money, one market: The effect of common currencies on trade. Economic Policy, 15(30), 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rose, A. K. (2001). Currency unions and trade: The effect is large. Economic Policy, 16(33), 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rose, A. K. (2004). Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? American Economic Review, 94(1), 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rose, A. K., & Engel, C. (2002). Currency unions and international integration. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 34(4), 1067–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rose, A. K., & Stanley, T. D. (2005). A meta-analysis of the effect of common currencies on international trade. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 347–365.Google Scholar
  72. Rose, A. K., & van Wincoop, E. (2001). National money as a barrier to international trade: The real case for currency union. American Economic Review, 91(2), 386–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sadikov, A. M., Zeng, L., Clark, P. B., Wei, S.-J., & Tamirisa, N. T. (2004). A new look at exchange rate volatility and trade flows. (IMF Occasional Paper 235). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  74. Saiki, A. (2002). Common currency as an export promoting strategy. Technical report, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  75. Shin, Y., & Serlenga, L. (2007). Gravity models of intra-EU trade: Application of the CCEP-HT estimation in heterogeneous panels with unobserved common time-specific factors. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shirono, K. (2008). Real effects of common currencies in East Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 19(3), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smith, C. (2002). Currency unions and gravity models revisited. (Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper Series 2002/07). Wellington: Reserve Bank of New Zealand.Google Scholar
  78. Stanley, T., & Doucouliagos, C. (2007). Identifying and correcting publication selection bias in the efficiency-wage literature: Heckman meta-regression. (Economics Series 2007/11). Burwood: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  79. Stanley, T., Doucouliagos, C., & Jarrell, S. B. (2008). Meta-regression analysis as the socio-economics of economics research. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1), 276–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stanley, T. D. (2001). Wheat from Chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stanley, T. D. (2005a). Beyond publication bias. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 309–345.Google Scholar
  82. Stanley, T. D. (2005b). Integrating the empirical tests of the natural rate hypothesis: A meta-regression analysis. Kyklos, 58(4), 611–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stanley, T. D. (2008). Meta-regression methods for detecting and estimating empirical effects in the presence of publication selection. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(1), 103–127.Google Scholar
  84. Stanley, T. D., & Jarrell, S. B. (1989). Meta-regression analysis: A quantitative method of literature surveys. Journal of Economic Surveys, 3(2), 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Subramanian, A., & Wei, S.-J. (2007). The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sutton, A. J., Abrams, K. R., Jones, D. R., Sheldon, T. A., & Song, F. (2000). Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  87. Taglioni, D. (2004). Monetary union, exchange rate variability and trade. Ph.D. thesis, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
  88. Tenreyro, S. (2001). On the causes and consequences of currency unions. Technical report, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  89. Thom, R., & Walsh, B. (2002). The effect of a currency union on trade: Lessons from the Irish experience. European Economic Review, 46(6), 1111–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tsangarides, C. G., Ewenczyk, P., & Hulej, M. (2006). Stylized facts on bilateral trade and currency unions: Implications for Africa. (IMF Working Paper 06/31). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  91. Yamarik, S., & Ghosh, S. (2005). A sensitivity analysis of the gravity model. The International Trade Journal, 19, 83–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Research and Financial Stability DepartmentCzech National BankPrague 1Czech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Economic StudiesCharles University in PraguePrague 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations