Global manufacturing SO2 emissions: does trade matter?
- First Online:
- 183 Downloads
A growth-decomposition (scale, technique and composition effect) covering 62 countries and seven manufacturing sectors over the 1990–2000 period shows that trade, through reallocations of activities across countries, has contributed to a 2–3% decrease in world SO2 emissions. However, when compared to a constructed counterfactual no-trade benchmark, depending on the base year, trade would have contributed to a 3–10% increase in emissions. Finally adding emissions coming from trade-related transport activities, global emissions are increased through trade by 16% in 1990 and 13% in 2000, the decline being largely attributable to a shift of dirty activities towards cleaner countries.
KeywordsEmbodied emissions in trade Environment Growth decomposition Transport World trade
JEL ClassificationF18 Q56
- Anthony, M., Fleet, D., & Wells, A. (2004). Sulphur production and usage in the processing of non-ferrous metals. Mimeo, London.Google Scholar
- CEPII (Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales) (2006). Distance database, http://www.cepii.fr/francgraph/bdd/distances.htm.
- Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2003). Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Dasgupta, S., Wheeler, D., & Moody, A. (1999). Environmental regulation and development: A cross-country empirical analysis. (Policy Research Working Paper No. 1448). World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- EC (European Commission) (1999). DG transport: Guide to the transport acquis. Luxemburg.Google Scholar
- Grether, J.-M., & de Melo, J. (2004). Globalization and dirty industries: Do pollution havens matter? In R. E. Baldwin & A. Winters (Eds.), Challenges to globalization: Analyzing the economics (pp. 167–208). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Grether, J. M., Mathys, N., & de Melo, J. (2007). Trade, technique and composition effects: What is behind the fall in worldwide SO 2 emissions 1990-2000? (CEPR Discussion Paper 6522). Centre of European Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
- Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. (NBER Working paper No. 3914). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Hettige, H. P., Martin, P., Singh, M., & Wheeler, D. (1995). The Industrial Pollution Projection System: IPPS. (Policy Research Working Paper No. 1431). World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Levinson, A. (2007). Technology, international trade, and pollution from US manufacturing. (NBER Working Paper No. 13616). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Network for Transport and Environment (2003). http://www.ntm.a.se/english/eng-index.asp.
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1997). The environmental effect of freight. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/14/3/2386636.pdf.
- Olivier, J. G. J., & Berdowski, J. J. M. (2001). Global emissions sources and sinks. In J. Berdowski, R. Guicherit, & B. J. Heij (Eds.), The Climate System (pp. 33–78). Lisse: A.A. Balkema Publishers/Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.Google Scholar
- Olivier, J. G. J., Berdowski, J. J. M., Peters, J. A. H. W., Bakker, J., Visschedijik, A. J. J. H., & Bloos, J. P. J. (2002). Applications of EDGAR. RIVM report 773301001/NRP report 410200051.Google Scholar
- Schichtel, B. A. (1996). The retrieval of pollution emission fields from ambient concentration and precipitation chemistry data. PhD Thesis at Sever Institute at Washington University.Google Scholar