Advertisement

Review of World Economics

, Volume 145, Issue 2, pp 189–206 | Cite as

On the bilateral trade effects of free trade agreements between the EU-15 and the CEEC-4 countries

  • Guglielmo Maria Caporale
  • Christophe Rault
  • Robert Sova
  • Anamaria Sova
Original Paper

Abstract

The expansion of regionalism has spawned an extensive theoretical literature analysing the effects of free trade agreements (FTAs) on trade flows. In this paper we focus on FTAs (also called European agreements) between the European Union (EU-15) and the Central and Eastern European countries (CEEC-4, i.e. Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland and Romania) and model their effects on trade flows by treating the agreement variable as endogenous. Our theoretical framework is the gravity model, and the econometric method used to isolate and eliminate the potential endogeneity bias of the agreement variable is the fixed effect vector decomposition (FEVD) technique. Our estimation results indicate a positive and significant impact of FTAs on trade flows. This finding is robust to the inclusion in the sample of a group of control countries (specifically Belarus, the Russian Federation and the Ukraine) that did not sign an FTA. Besides, we show that trade growth after the FTA agreement with the EU was signed exceeded trade growth of the control group of countries, which did not become members.

Keywords

Regionalisation European integration Panel data methods 

JEL Classification

F13 F15 C23 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to a referee and a member of the Advisory Board for helpful remarks and suggestions on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

  1. Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: A temporal cross-section analysis. American Economic Review, 63(5), 881–892.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.Google Scholar
  3. Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2004). Economic determinants of free-trade agreements. Journal of International Economics, 64(1), 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R. E. (1994). Towards an integrated Europe. London: CEPR.Google Scholar
  6. Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhagwati, J., & Panagariya, A. (1996). The theory of preferential trade agreements: Historical evolution and current trends. American Economic Review, 86(2), 82–87.Google Scholar
  9. Carrère, C. (2006). Revisiting the effects of regional trading agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review, 50(2), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, C. A., & Massell, B. F. (1965). A new look at customs union theory. Economic Journal, 75(300), 742–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Melo, J., Panagariya, A., & Rodick, D. (1993). The new regionalism: A country perspective. Policy research working paper series 1094. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Egger, P. (2000). A note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation. Economics Letters, 66(1), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egger, P. (2002). An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials. The World Economy, 25(2), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2003). The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics, 28(3), 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2004). Distance, trade and FDI: A SUR Hausman–Taylor approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(2), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eichengreen, B., & Irwin, D. A. (1995). Trade blocs, currency blocs and the reorientation of world trade in the 1930s. Journal of International Economics, 38(1–2), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández, R., & Portes, J. (1998). Returns to regionalism: An analysis of non traditional gains from regional trade agreements. World Bank Economic Review, 12(2), 197–220.Google Scholar
  18. Frankel, J. A. (1997). Regional trading blocs in the world economic system. Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  19. Frankel, J. A., & Wei, S.-J. (1998). Open regionalism in a world of continental trade blocs. IMF Staff Papers, 45(3), 440–453.Google Scholar
  20. Frankel, J. A., Stein, E., & Wei, S.-J. (1996). Regional trading arrangements: Natural or supernatural. American Economic Review, 86(2), 52–56.Google Scholar
  21. Ghosh, S., & Yamarik, S. (2004). Are regional trading arrangements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. Journal of International Economics, 63(2), 369–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glick, R., & Rose, A. K. (2002). Does a currency union affect trade? The time series evidence. European Economic Review, 46(6), 1125–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1995). The politics of free-trade agreements. American Economic Review, 85(4), 667–690.Google Scholar
  24. Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Hausman, J. A., & Taylor, W. E. (1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1377–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, H. (1965). An economic theory of protectionism, tariff bargaining and the formation of customs union. Journal of Political Economy, 73(3), 256–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Linnemann, H. (1966). An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  31. Magee, C. (2003). Endogenous preferential trade agreements: An empirical analysis. Contributions to economic analysis and policy, 2(1), article 15. Berkeley Electronic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Matyas, L. (1997). Proper econometric specification of the gravity model. The World Economy, 20(3), 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Plümper, T., & Troeger, V. E. (2004). The estimation of time-invariant variables in panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Social Science Research Network, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  34. Pöyhönen, P. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90(1), 93–100.Google Scholar
  35. Rault, C., Sova, A., Sova, R. (2007a). The endogeneity of association agreements and their impact on trade for Eastern countries: Empirical evidence for Romania. Working Paper No. 868. William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  36. Rault, C., Sova, R., Sova, A. (2007b). The role of association agreements within European Union enlargement to Central and Eastern European countries. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2769. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn.Google Scholar
  37. Rose, A. K. (2004). Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? American Economic Review, 94(1), 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schiff, M., & Winters, L. A. (1998). Regional integration as diplomacy. World Bank Economic Review, 12(2), 271–295.Google Scholar
  39. Soloaga, I., & Winters, L. A. (2001). Regionalism in the nineties: What effect on trade? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  41. Viner, J. (1950). The customs union issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  42. Wonnacott, P., & Lutz, M. (1989). Is there a case for free trade areas? In J. Schott (Ed.), Free trade areas and US trade policy. Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  43. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guglielmo Maria Caporale
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christophe Rault
    • 4
    • 5
  • Robert Sova
    • 6
  • Anamaria Sova
    • 7
  1. 1.Centre for Empirical FinanceBrunel UniversityWest LondonUK
  2. 2.CESifoMunichGermany
  3. 3.DIWBerlinGermany
  4. 4.LEOUniversity of Orléans, UMR 6221, BEM (Bordeaux Management School)OrléansFrance
  5. 5.EDHEC (Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales)Lille CedexFrance
  6. 6.CESSorbonne University, A.S.E and E.B.R.CParisFrance
  7. 7.CESSorbonne University, E.B.R.CParisFrance

Personalised recommendations