Review of World Economics

, Volume 143, Issue 4, pp 673–693 | Cite as

Child Mortality: Is Aid Fungibility in Pro-Poor Expenditure Sectors Decisive?

  • Jan Pettersson


If development assistance targeted at specific sectors is not used as intended, aid is said to be fungible. Using country-specific estimates of the degree of aid fungibility in “pro-poor” government expenditure sectors, I assess the effect on child mortality. Results indicate that fungibility within these sectors does not help to explain differences in mortality. However, when separating the sample into democracies and non-democracies, results suggest that pro-poor expenditures influence mortality in non-democracies only and that aid treated as fungible tends to be used efficiently in democracies.


Foreign aid fungibility poverty public expenditure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Boone, P. (1996). Politics and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid. European Economic Review 40 (2): 289–329.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chauvet, L., and P. Collier (2007). What Are the Preconditions for Turnarounds in Failing States? Mimeo. Centre for the Study of African Economies, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, S., and M. Ravaillon (2004). How Have the World’s Poorest Fared Since the Early 1980’s? World Bank Research Observer 19 (2): 141–169. Data available at <>.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clemens, M. A., S. Radelet, and R. Bhavnani (2004). Counting Chickens When They Hatch: The Short-Term Effect of Aid on Growth. Center for Global Development Working Paper 44. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Devarajan, S., and V. Swaroop (1998). The Implications of Foreign Aid Fungibility for Development Assistance. Mimeo. Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devarajan, S., A. S. Rajkumar, and V. Swaroop (1999). What Does Aid to Africa Finance? Policy Research Working Papers 2092. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dreher, A., P. Nunnenkamp, and R. Thiele (2006). Does Aid for Education Educate Children? Evidence from Panel Data. Kiel Working Papers 1290. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekman, B., and K. Metell (1993). Foreign Aid and Fungibility: The Kenyan Case. Undergraduate Thesis in Economics, Department of Economics, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feyzioglu, T., V. Swaroop, and M. Zhu (1998). A Panel Data Analysis of the Fungibility of Foreign Aid. World Bank Economic Review 12 (1): 29–58.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Filmer, D., and L. Pritchett (1999). The Impact of Public Spending on Health: Does Money Matter? Social Science & Medicine 49: 1309–1323.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gomanee, K., S. Girma, and O. Morrissey (2005a). Aid, Public Spending and Human Welfare: Evidence from Quantile Regressions. Journal of International Development 17 (3): 299–309.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gomanee, K., O. Morrissey, P. Mosley, and A. Verschoor (2003). Aid, Pro-Poor Government Spending, and Welfare. CREDIT Research Paper 03/03. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gomanee, K., O. Morrissey, P. Mosley, and A. Verschoor (2005b). Aid, Government Expenditure, and Aggregate Welfare. World Development 33 (3): 355–370.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holmqvist, G. (2000). Fungibility Parameters: A Comment on Their Reliability and Policy Implications from an Aid Practitioner. Paper presented at the SIDA conference on Aid and Development. January 20–21, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2003). Government Finance Statistics Database. CD-ROM, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knack, S., and P. Keefer (1995). Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Economic and Politics 7 (3): 207–227.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kosack, S. (2003). Effective Aid: How Democracy Allows Development Aid to Improve the Quality of Life. World Development 31 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marshall, M. G., and K. Jaggers (2002). Polity IV Project. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Integrated Network for Social Conflict Research (INSCR) Program. Center for International Development and Conflict Management. University of Maryland. Available at <>.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McGillivray, M., and O. Morrissey (2000). Aid Fungibility in Assessing Aid: Red Herring or True Concern? Journal of International Development 12 (3): 413–428.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGillivray, M., and O. Morrissey (2001a). Aid Illusion and Public Sector Fiscal Behaviour. Journal of Development Studies 37 (6): 118–136.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McGillivray, M., and O. Morrissey (2001b). A Review of Evidence on the Fiscal Effects of Aid. CREDIT Research Paper 01/13. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mosley, P., J. Hudson, and A. Verschoor (2004). Aid, Poverty Reduction and the “New Conditionality”. Economic Journal 114 (June): 217–243.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Osmani, S. R. (1992). On Some Controversies in the Measurement of Undernutrition. In S. R. Osmani (ed.), Nutrition and Poverty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pack, H., and J. R. Pack (1990). Is Foreign Aid Fungible? The Case of Indonesia. Economic Journal 100 (March): 188–194.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pack, H., and J. R. Pack (1993). Foreign Aid and the Question of Fungibility. Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (2): 258–265.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pack, H., and J. R. Pack (1998). Foreign Aid and Fiscal Stress. In G. Saxonhouse and T. N. Srinivasan (eds.), Development, Duality, and the International Regime: Essays in Honor of Gustav Ranis. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pettersson, J. (2007). Foreign Sectoral Aid Fungibility, Growth and Poverty Reduction. Journal of International Development 19 (8): 1074–1098.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reinikka, R., and J. Svensson (2004). Local Capture: Evidence from a Central Government Transfer Program in Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (2): 679–705.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Strand, H., L. Wilhelmsen, and N. P. Gleditsch (2002). Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook. Version 1.1. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Svensson, J. (2000). When Is Foreign Aid Policy Credible? Aid Dependence and Conditionality. Journal of Development Economics 61 (1): 61–84.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Svensson, J. (2003). Why Conditional Aid Does Not Work and What Can Be Done About It? Journal of Development Economics 70 (2): 381–402.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Swaroop, V., S. Jha, and A. S. Rajkumar (2000). Fiscal Effects of Foreign Aid in a Federal System of Governance. The Case of India. Journal of Public Economics 77 (3): 307–330.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tavares, J. (2003). Does Foreign Aid Corrupt? Economics Letters 79 (1): 99–106.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2005). Human Development Report. Available at: <>.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    White, H. (1998). Aid and Macroeconomic Performance. In H. White (ed.), Aid and Macroeconomic Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    World Bank (1998). Assessing Aid. What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why. A World Bank Policy Research Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    World Bank (various issues). World Development Indicators. CD-ROM, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations