Review of World Economics

, Volume 142, Issue 2, pp 233–266 | Cite as

Has International Trade Affected Workers’ Bargaining Power?

Article

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate whether globalization has affected workers’ bargaining power in the Belgian manufacturing industry over the period 1987–1995 using a sample of more than 20,000 firms. We find little evidence of international trade and inward foreign direct investment having an impact on the workers’ bargaining power. We find some evidence that technological change has a positive impact on the workers’ bargaining power.

Keywords

Rent sharing international trade instrumental variables panel data 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abowd, J., and T. Lemieux (1993). The Effects of Product Market Competition on Collective Bargaining Agreements: The Case of Foreign Competition in Canada. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (4): 983–1014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abraham, F., and N. Verret (1996). De Internationale Positie van de Belgische Economie in Toekomstperspectief. Verbond van Belgische Ondernemingen. Brussels.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, and G. Violante (2001). Deunionization, Technical Change and Inequality. CEPR Discussion Paper 3764. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, P. M. (1993). Linear Adjustment Costs and Seasonal Labor Demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (4): 1015–1042.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berman, E., J. Bound, and Z. Griliches (1994). Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within US Manufacturing. Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufacturers. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (2): 367–397.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernard, A. B., and J. B. Jensen (2002). The Death of Manufacturing Plants. NBER Working Paper 9026. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Betcherman, G. (1991). Does Technological Change Affect Union Bargaining Power? British Journal of Industrial Relations 29 (3): 447–462.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Binmore, K., A. Rubinstein, and A. Wolinsky (1986). The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling. RAND Journal of Economics 17 (2): 176–188.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biscourp, P., and F. Kramarz (2002). The Impact of Imports on the Firm’s Production Process: A Firm-Level Analysis for France. Paris: CREST, Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blanchard, O., and F. Giavazzi (2003). Macroeconomic Effects of Regulation and Deregulation in Goods and Labor Markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (3): 879–908.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blanchflower, D. G., A. J. Oswald, and P. Sanfey (1996). Wages, Profits and Rent-Sharing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (1): 227–251.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boeri, T., A. Brugiavini, and L. Calmfors (2001). The Role of Unions in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bound, J., D. Jaeger, and R. Baker (1995). Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable Is Weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (430): 443–450.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bronars, S., and M. Famulari (2001). Shareholder Wealth and Wages: Evidence for White-Collar Workers. Journal of Political Economy 109 (2): 328–354.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, J., and O. Ashenfelter (1986). Testing the Efficiency of Employment Contracts. Journal of Political Economy XCIV (3): S40-S87.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bruno, G., A. M. Falzoni, and R. Helg (2004). Measuring the Effect of Globalization on Labour Demand Elasticity: An Empirical Application to OECD Countries. CESPRI Working Paper 153. Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation, Bocconi University.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Budd, J. W., and M. Slaughter (2004). Are Profits Shared Across Borders? Evidence on International Rent Sharing. Journal of Labor Economics 22 (3): 525–552.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Budd, J. W., J. Konings, and M. J. Slaughter (2005). Wages and International Rent Sharing in Multinational Firms. Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 73–84.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bughin, J. (1993). Union-Firm Efficient Bargaining and Test of Oligopolistic Conduct. Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (3): 563–567.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bughin, J. (1996). Trade Unions and Firms’ Product Market Power. Journal of Industrial Economics XLIV (3): 289–307.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Christofides, L. N., and A. J. Oswald (1992). Real Wage Determination and Rent-Sharing in Collective Bargaining Agreements. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (3): 985–1002.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clark, S. J. (1991). Inventory Accumulation, Wages and Employment. Economic Journal 101 (405): 230–238.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clark, S. J. (1993). The Strategic Use of Inventories in an Infinite Horizon Model of Wage and Employment Bargaining. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 40 (2): 165–183.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Backer, K. (2002). Multinational Firms and Industry Dynamics in Host Countries: The Case of Belgium. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculteit der Economische en Toegepaste Economische Wetenschappen.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Backer, K., and L. Sleuwaegen (2003). Does Foreign Direct Investment Crowd Out Domestic Entrepreneurship? Review of Industrial Organisation 22 (1): 67–84.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dobbelaere, S. (2004a). Estimation of Price-Cost Margins and Union Bargaining Power for Belgian Manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization 22 (10): 1381–1398.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dobbelaere, S. (2004b). Ownership, Firm Size and Rent Sharing in Bulgaria. Labour Economics 11 (2): 165–189.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Doiron, D. J. (1992). Bargaining Power and Wage-Employment Contracts in a Unionized Industry. International Economic Review 33 (3): 583–606.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Estevao, M., and S. Tevlin (2003). Do Firms Share their Success with their Workers? The Response of Wages to Product Market Conditions. Economica 70 (280): 597–617.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2003). Belgium—Collective Bargaining, http://www.eurofound.eu.int/emire/BELGIUM/COLLECTIVEBARGAINING-BE.html.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fabbri, F., J. Haskel, and M. Slaughter (2003). Does Nationality of Ownership Matter for Labor Demands? Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (2–3): 698–707.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fajnzylber, P., and W. F. Maloney (2000). Labor Demand and Trade Reform in Latin America. World Bank Policy Working Paper 2491. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Federal Planning Bureau (2000). Delokalisatie, een Element van Industriële Dynamiek. De Studie over Delokalisatie, Innovatie en Werkgelegenheid. Syntheserapport. Brussels: DWTC, Dienst voor Wetenschappelijke, Technische en Culturele Aangelegenheden.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Feenstra, R. C., and G. H. Hanson (1999). The Impact of Outsourcing and High-Technology Capital on Wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979–1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3): 907–940.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gibbons, R. (1992). A Primer in Game Theory. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Görg H., and E. Strobl (2003). ‘Footloose’ Multinationals. Manchester School 71 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Greenaway, D., R. C. Hine, and P. Wright (1999). An Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Trade on Employment in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Economy 15 (3): 485–500.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 92–116.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Haskel, J., and M. Slaughter (2003). Have Falling Tariffs and Transportation Costs Raised US Wage Inequality? Review of International Economics 11 (4): 630–650.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hasan, R., D. Mitra, and K. V. Ramaswamy (2003). Trade Reforms, Labor Regulations and Labor-Demand Elasticities: Empirical Evidence from India. NBER Working Paper 9879. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Horn, H., and A. Wolinsky (1988). Worker Substitutability and Patterns of Unionisation. Economic Journal 98 (391): 484–497.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jean, S. (2000). The Effect of International Trade on Labor-Demand Elasticities: Intersectoral Matters. Review of International Economics 8 (3): 504–516.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kramarz, F. (2003). Wages and International Trade. CEPR Discussion Paper 3936. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Krishna, P., D. Mitra, and S. Chinoy (2001). Trade Liberalization and Labor Demand Elasticities: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of International Economics 55 (2): 391–409.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Krugman, P., and R. Lawrence (1996). Trade, Jobs and Wages. In P. Krugman (ed.), Pop Internationalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kuhlmann, R. (1998). Information, Consultation and Preparing Decisions in the Age of Globalization: Conclusions from the Renault Case. In E. Gabaglio and R. Hoffmann (eds.), European Trade Union Yearbook. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Layard, R. M. G. , S. J. Nickell, and R. L. Jackman (1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lindén, J. (1995). Job Search and Wage Bargaining Power. Uppsala University Working Paper 95:14. Department of Economics, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Martin, S. (1993). Advanced Industrial Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Martins, P. (2004). Rent-Sharing before and after the Wage Bill. IZA Discussion Paper 1376. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Maskus, K. (1991). Comparing International Trade Data and Product and National Characteristics Data for the Analysis of Trade Models. In P. Hooper and J. D. Richardson (eds.), International Economic Transactions. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    McDonald, I. M., and R. M. Solow (1981). Wage Bargaining and Employment. American Economic Review 71 (5): 896–908.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    McDonald, I. M., and A. Suen (1992). On the Measurement and Determination of Trade Union Power. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54 (2): 209–225.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Messerlin, P. (2001). Measuring the Costs of Protection in Europe: European Commercial Policy in the 2000s. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    National Bank of Belgium (various issues). Balanscentrale. National Bank of Belgium, Brussels.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    NIS (Nationaal Instituut voor de Statistiek) (1997). Activiteitennomenclatuur NACE-Bel met Toelichtingen. Brussels: NIS.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development) (1999). The OECD Stan Database for Industrial Analysis. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development) (2002). Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Oswald, A. (1996). Rent-Sharing in the Labor Market. University of Warwick Department of Economics Research Paper 474. University of Warwick, Warwick.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Paes de Barros, R., C. H. Corseuil, and G. Gonzana (1999). Labor Market Regulations and the Demand for Labor in Brazil. IPEA Working Paper 656. Institute of Applied Economic Research, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rodrik, D. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Schreve, K., and M. Slaughter (2002). Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production. Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 662–674.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Schumacher, D. (1992). A Note on Human Capital Intensity of EC Trade. Cahiers Économiques de Bruxelles (133): 3–19.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Slaughter, M. (2001). International Trade and Labor-Demand Elasticities. Journal of International Economics 54 (1): 27–56.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Smith, J. C. (1996). Effet de Pouvoir de Négociation et du Marché Local du Travail sur la Determination des Salaires. Economie et Prévision 126 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Staiger, D., and J. H. Stock (1997). Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments. Econometrica 65 (3): 557–586.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Svejnar, J. (1986). Bargaining Power, Fear of Disagreement and Wage Settlements: Theory and Evidence from US Industry. Econometrica 54 (5): 1055–1078.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Teulings, C., and J. Hartog (1998). Corporatism or Competition? Labour Contracts, Institutions and Wage Structures in International Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Van Reenen, J. (1996). The Creation and Capture of Rents: Wages and Innovation in a Panel of UK Companies. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (1): 195–226.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vandenbussche, H., R. Veugelers, and J. Konings (2001). Unionization and European Antidumping Protection. Oxford Economic Papers 53: 297–317.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Verspagen, B., T. van Moergastel, and M. Slabbers (1994). MERIT Concordance Table: IPC-ISIC (rev.2). Merit Research Memorandum 2/94–004. MERIT, Maastricht.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Veugelers, R. (1989). Wage Premia, Price Cost Margins and Bargaining Power in Belgian Manufacturing. European Economic Review 33 (1): 169–180.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Kiel Institute 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.122, EPIP, Phase 2John F. Welch Technology CentreBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.SHERPPAGhent UniversityGhentThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations