Review of World Economics

, Volume 142, Issue 1, pp 92–121 | Cite as

The Gravity Equation in International Trade in Services

  • Fukunari Kimura
  • Hyun-Hoon Lee


The main purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of various factors on bilateral services trade, relative to that on bilateral goods trade. To accomplish this purpose, using the standard gravity model, we ran regressions on bilateral services trade and goods trade between 10 OECD member countries and other economies (including OECD member and nonmember countries) for the years 1999 and 2000. One main and interesting result is that services trade is better predicted by gravity equations than goods trade. Another interesting result is that there is a complementary relationship between goods exports and services imports.


Trade in services trade in goods gravity model economic freedom 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Armington, P. S. (1969). A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. IMF Staff Papers 16 (1): 159–176.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J. E. (1979). A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review 69 (1): 106–116.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, J. E., and E. van Wincoop (2003). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review 93 (1): 170–192.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergstrand, J. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 474–481.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bergstrand, J. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (1): 143–153.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deardorff, V. A. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? In Jeffrey A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of Economy. Chicago: Univerty of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Mauro, F. (2000). The Impact of Economic Integration on FDI and Exports: A Gravity Approach. Working Document 156. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (2002). Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica 70 (5): 1741–1779.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graham, E. M. (1996). On the Relationship among FDI and International Trade in the Manufacturing Sector: Empirical Results for the United States and Japan. WTO Staff Working Paper RD-96-008. Geneva.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grünfeld, L. A., and A. Moxnes (2003). The Intangible Globalization: Explaining the Patterns of International Trade in Services. Discussion Paper 657. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Oslo.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harrigan, J. (2002). Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws. In K. Choi and J. Harrigan (eds.), The Handbook of International Trade. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Helpman, E., and P. Krugman (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the International Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karsenty, G. (2000). Assessing Trade in Services by Mode of Supply. In P. Sauvé and R. M. Stern (eds.), GATS 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalisation. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kimura, F. (2003). Economic Analysis on Japan-Korea FTA: Services Trade. Mimeo. Keio University.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, H.-H., and P. J. Lloyd (2002). Intra-Industry Trade in Services. In P. J. Lloyd and H.-H. Lee (eds.), Frontiers of Research in Intra-Industry Trade. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mirza, D., and G. Nicoletti (2004). What Is So Special about Trade in Services? Research Paper 2004/02. Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy, Nottingham.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    OECD (2002). OECD Statistics on International Trade in Services, Detailed Tables by Partner Country 1999–2001. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    OECD (2003). Total Imports and Exports for the 30 OECD Member Countries by Partner Country. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pöyhönen, P. (1963). A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 90 (1): 93–100.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy—Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    UN, European Commission, IMF, OECD, UNCTAD, and WTO (2002). The Manual on Statistics of International Trade in Services. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Kiel Institute 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keio UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Division of Economics and International TradeKangwon National UniversityChuncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations