4OR

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 139–157 | Cite as

A large neighbourhood search heuristic for the aircraft and passenger recovery problem

  • Serge Bisaillon
  • Jean-François Cordeau
  • Gilbert Laporte
  • Federico Pasin
Research Paper

Abstract

This paper introduces a large neighbourhood search heuristic for an airline recovery problem combining fleet assignment, aircraft routing and passenger assignment. Given an initial schedule, a list of disruptions, and a recovery period, the problem consists in constructing aircraft routes and passenger itineraries for the recovery period that allow the resumption of regular operations and minimize operating costs and impacts on passengers. The heuristic alternates between construction, repair and improvement phases, which iteratively destroy and repair parts of the solution. The aim of the first two phases is to produce an initial solution that satisfies a set of operational and functional constraints. The third phase then attempts to identify an improved solution by considering large schedule changes while retaining feasibility. The whole process is iterated by including some randomness in the construction phase so as to diversify the search. This work was initiated in the context of the 2009 ROADEF Challenge, a competition organized jointly by the French Operational Research and Decision Analysis Society and the Spanish firm Amadeus S.A.S., in which our team won the first prize.

Keywords

Airline recovery Fleet assignment Aircraft routing Passenger itineraries Large neighbourhood search 

MSC classification (2000)

90C27 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdelghany AF, Ekollu G, Narasimhan R, Abdelghany KF (2004) A proactive crew recovery decision support tool for commercial airlines during irregular operations. Ann Oper Res 127: 309–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdelghany KF, Abdelghany AF, Ekollu G (2008) An integrated decision support tool for airlines schedule recovery during irregular operations. Eur J Oper Res 185: 825–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argüello MF, Bard JF, Yu G (1997) A GRASP for aircraft routing in response to groundings and delays. J Comb Optim 5: 211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball M, Barnhart C, Nemhauser GL, Odoni A (2007) Air transportation: irregular operations and control. In: Barnhart C, Laporte G (eds) Handbooks in operations research and management science, vol 14. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–61Google Scholar
  5. Bratu S, Barnhart C (2006) Flight operations recovery: new approaches considering passenger recovery. J Sched 9: 279–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao JM, Kanafani A (1997) Real-time decision support for integration of airline flight cancellations and delays part I: mathematical formulation. Transp Plan Technol 20: 183–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao JM, Kanafani A (1997) Real-time decision support for integration of airline flight cancellations and delays part I: algorithm and computational experiments. Transp Plan Technol 20: 201–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clausen J, Larsen A, Larsen J, Rezanova NJ (2010) Disruption management in the airline industry: concepts, models and methods. Comput Oper Res 37: 809–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarrah A, Yu G, Krishnamurthy N, Rakshit A (1993) A decision support framework for airline flight cancellations and delays. Transp Sci 27: 266–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jozefowiez N, Mancel C, Mora-Camino F (2010) A heuristic approach based on shortest path problems for integrated flight, aircraft, and passenger rescheduling under disruptions. LAAS technical report, Université de ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  11. Lettovsky L, Johnson EL, Nemhauser GL (2000) Airline crew recovery. Transp Sci 34: 337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luo S, Yu G (1997) On the airline schedule perturbation problem caused by the ground delay program. Transp Sci 31: 298–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mansi R (2009) Approches hybrides pour des variantes du sac à dos et applications. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Valenciennes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  14. Mansi R, Wilbaut C, Hanafi S, Clautiaux F (2009) Combining oscillation heuristic and mathematical programming for disruption management in the airline industry. To appear in Proceedings of the VIII metaheuristic international conference (MIC), HamburgGoogle Scholar
  15. Medard C, Sawhney N (2007) Airline crew scheduling: from planning to operations. Eur J Oper Res 183: 1013–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nissen R, Haase K (2006) Duty-period-based network model for crew rescheduling in European airlines. J Sched 9: 255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palpant M, Boudia M, Robelin C-A, Gabteni S, Laburthe F (2009) ROADEF 2009 challenge: disruption management for commercial aviation. Working paper, Amadeus S.A.S., Operations Research Division, Sophia Antipolis, FranceGoogle Scholar
  18. Rakshit A, Krishnamurthy N, Yu G (1996) System operations advisor: a real-time decision support system for managing airline operations at United Airlines. Interfaces 26(2): 50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenberger JM, Johnson EL, Nemhauser GL (2003) Rerouting aircraft for airline recovery. Transp Sci 37: 408–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schrimpf G, Schneider J, Stamm-Wilbrandt H, Dueck G (2000) Record breaking optimization results using the ruin and recreate principle. J Comput Phys 159: 139–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaw P (1998) Using constraint programming and local search methods to solve vehicle routing problems In: CP-98 (4th international conference on principles and practice of constraint programming), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1520. Springer, Berlin, pp 417–431Google Scholar
  22. Stojković M, Soumis F (2001) An optimization model for the simultaneous operational flight and pilot scheduling problem. Manag Sci 47: 1290–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stojković M, Soumis F, Desrosiers J (1998) The operational airline crew scheduling problem. Transp Sci 32: 232–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stojković G, Soumis F, Desrosiers J, Solomon MM (2002) An optimization model for a real-time flight scheduling problem. Transp Res A 36: 779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Teodorović D, Guberinić S (1984) Optimal dispatching strategy on an airline network after a schedule perturbation. Eur J Oper Res 15: 178–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thengvall BG, Bard JF, Yu G (2003) A bundle algorithm approach for the aircraft schedule recovery problem during hub closures. Transp Sci 37: 392–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu G, Argüello M, Song G, McCowan SM, White A (2003) A new era for crew recovery at Continental Airlines. Interfaces 33(1): 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang Y, Hansen M (2008) Real-time inter-modal substitution (RTIMS) as an airport congestion management strategy. Transp Res Rec 2052: 90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serge Bisaillon
    • 1
  • Jean-François Cordeau
    • 2
  • Gilbert Laporte
    • 2
  • Federico Pasin
    • 3
  1. 1.Université de Montréal and CIRRELTMontrealCanada
  2. 2.HEC Montréal and CIRRELTMontrealCanada
  3. 3.HEC MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations