Advertisement

Identifying systemically important financial institutions: a network approach

  • Pablo Rovira Kaltwasser
  • Alessandro Spelta
Original Paper
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has proposed a methodology to identify Systemically Important Financial Institutions based on a series of indicators that should account for the externalities that these institutions place into the system. In this article we argue that the methodology chosen by Basel III maintains the micro-prudential focus of Basel I and II. We show how the PageRank algorithm that operates behind the Google search engine can be modified and applied to identify Systemically Important Financial Institutions. Being a feedback measure of systemic importance, the PageRank algorithm evaluates more than individual exposures. The algorithm is able to capture the risks that individual institutions place into the system, while at the same time, taking into account how the exposures at the system-wide level affect the ranking of individual institutions. In accordance to the Basel III framework, we are able to distinguish between systemic importance due to exposures born on the asset and on the liability side of the balance sheet of banks.

Keywords

Systemic risk Interbank market Complex networks 

JEL Classification

E44 G21 

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2010) Cascades in networks and aggregate volatility. NBER Working Papers 16516, National Bureau of Economic Research, IncGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2015) Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Am Econ Rev 105(2):564–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acharya VV, Pedersen LH, Philippon T, Richardson M (2010) Measuring systemic risk. Working Paper 1002, Federal Reserve Bank of ClevelandGoogle Scholar
  4. Acharya VV, Gromb D, Yorulmazer T (2012) Imperfect competition in the inter-bank market for liquidity as a rationale for central banking. Am Econ J: Macroecon 4(2):184–217Google Scholar
  5. Adrian T, Brunnermeier MK (2008) Covar. Staff Reports 348, Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Albert R, Barabási A-L (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(47):97Google Scholar
  7. Allen F, Gale D (2000) Financial contagion. J Polit Econ 108(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Allen F, Babus A, Carletti E (2012) Asset commonality, debt maturity and systemic risk. J Financ Econ 104(3):519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Babus A (2007) The formation of financial networks. Working Papers 2007.69, Fondazione Eni Enrico MatteiGoogle Scholar
  10. Bank of England (2009). The role of macroprudential policy. Discussion paper, Bank of EnglandGoogle Scholar
  11. Basel I (2004) International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: a revised framework basle committee on banking supervision. http: //www. bis.org/publ/bcbs107.htmGoogle Scholar
  12. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2013) Global systemically important banks: Updated assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement. Technical report, Bank for International SettlementsGoogle Scholar
  13. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2015) Implementation of Basel standards. A report to G20 Leaders on implementation of the Basel III regulatory reforms. Technical report, Bank for International SettlementsGoogle Scholar
  14. Battiston S, Delli Gatti D, Gallegati M, Greenwald B, Stiglitz JE (2012) Liaisons dangereuses: increasing connectivity, risk sharing and systemic risk. J Econ Dyn Control 36(8):1121–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bech ML, Atalay E (2010) The topology of the federal funds market. Phys A 389(22):5223–5246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borgatti SP, Everett MG (2006) A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc Netwo 28(4):466–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Borio CEV (2003) Towards a macroprudential framework for financial supervision and regulation? BIS Working Papers 128, Bank for International SettlementsGoogle Scholar
  18. Borio CEV, Furfine C, Lowe P (2001) Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stability: Issues and policy options. BIS Working Papers 1, Bank for International SettlementsGoogle Scholar
  19. Boss M, Elsinger H, Summer M, Thurner S (2004) Network topology of the interbank market. Quantitative Finance 4(6):677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput Netw ISDN Syst 30(1–7):107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brownlees CT, Engle RF (2012) Volatility, correlation and tails for systemic risk measurement. Working paper, mimeoGoogle Scholar
  22. Brunnermeier MK, Crockett A, Goodhart C, Persaud A, Shin H (2009) The Fundamental Principles of Financial Regulation. International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies Centre for Economic Policy Research, Geneva LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Castiglionesi F, Navarro N (2007) Optimal fragile financial networks. Discussion Paper 2007-100, Tilburg University, Center for Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  24. Castro C, Ferrari S (2014) Measuring and testing for the systemically important financial institutions. J Empir Finance 25:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman ME (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 51(4):661–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cocco JF, Gomes FJ, Martins NC (2009) Lending relationships in the interbank market. J Financ Intermed 18(1):24–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cont R, Moussa A, Santos EB (2013) Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems. In: Fouque J-P, Langsam JA (eds) Handbook on systemic risk. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Craig B, von Peter G (2010) Interbank tiering and money center banks. Working Paper 322, Bank for International SettlementsGoogle Scholar
  29. Crockett A (2000) Marrying the macro- and micro-prudential dimensions of financial stability. BIS Working Papers 1, Bank for International SettlementsGoogle Scholar
  30. De Masi G, Iori G, Caldarelli G (2006) Fitness model for the italian interbank money markets. Phys Rev E 74:066112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Degryse H, Nguyen G (2007) Interbank exposures: an empirical examination of contagion risk in the belgian banking system. Int J Central Bank 3(123):171Google Scholar
  32. Diamond DW, Dybvig PH (1983) Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. J Polit Econ 91(3):401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Diebold FX, Yilmaz K (2011) On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Working Paper 1124, Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  34. Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1(1):269–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Drehmann M, Tarashev N (2013) Measuring the systemic importance of interconnected banks. J Financ Intermed 22(4):586–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dungey M, Luciani M, Veredas D (2013) Googling sifis. ULB Institutional Repository 2013/154950, ULB—Universite Libre de BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  37. Elsinger H, Lehar A, Summer M (2006) Risk assessment for banking systems. Manag Sci 52(9):1301–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fehr E (2009) On the economics and biology of trust. J Eur Econ Assoc 7(2–3):235–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1:215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Freixas X, Holthausen C (2005) Interbank market integration under asymmetric infor-mation. Rev Financ Stud 18(2):459–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Freixas X, Parigi BM, Rochet J-C (2000) Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity provision by the central bank. J Money Credit Bank 32(3):611–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fricke D (2012) Trading strategies in the overnight money market: Correlations and clustering on the e-mid trading platform. Working Paper 1766, Kiel Institute for the World EconomyGoogle Scholar
  43. Fricke D, Lux T (2012) Core–periphery structure in the overnight money market: Evidence from the e-mid trading platform. Working Paper 1759, Kiel Institute for the World EconomyGoogle Scholar
  44. Fricke D, Lux T (2013). On the distribution of links in the interbank network: Evidence from the e-mid overnight money markets. Technical report, Kiel Institute for the World EconomyGoogle Scholar
  45. Fricke D, Lux T (2015) Core-periphery structure in the overnight money market: evidence from the e-mid trading platform. Comput Econ 45(3):359–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Furfine CH (2001) Banks as monitors of other banks: evidence from the overnight federal funds market. J Bus 74(1):33–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Furfine CH (2003) Interbank exposures: quantifying the risk of contagion. J Money Credit Bank 35:111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gai P, Kapadia S (2010) Contagion in financial networks. Proc R Soc A 466:2401–2423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Haldane AG (2009) Rethinking the financial networks. Speech delivered at the financial student association, Amsterdam, Bank of EnglandGoogle Scholar
  50. Haldane AG, May R (2011) Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Haldane AG et al (2009) Rethinking the financial network. Speech delivered at the Financial Student Association, Amsterdam, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  52. Hatzopoulos, V. and Iori, G. (2012). Information theoretic description of the e-mid interbank market: Implications for systemic risk. Discussion Paper 12/04, Department of Economics, School of Social Science, City University LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Hellwig M (2010) Capital regulation after the crisis: business as usual? CESifo DICE Rep 8(2):40–46Google Scholar
  54. Inaoka H, Ninomiya T, Taniguchi K, Shimizu T, Takayasu H (2004) Fractal network derived from banking transaction: An analysis of network structures formed by financial institutions. Technical Report 04-E-04, Bank of JapanGoogle Scholar
  55. Iori G, Renò R, De Masi G, Caldarelli G (2007) Trading strategies in the italian interbank market. Phys A 376(467):479Google Scholar
  56. Iori G, De Masi G, Precup O, Gabbi G, Caldarelli G (2008) A network analysis of the Italian overnight money market. J Econ Dyn Control 32(259):278Google Scholar
  57. Kashyap AK, Rajan RG, Stein JC (2008) Rethinking capital regulation. In: Proceedings of the 2008 economic symposium. Maintaining stability in a changing financial system. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp 431–471Google Scholar
  58. Krause A, Giansante S (2012) Interbank lending and the spread of bank failures: a network model of systemic risk. J Econ Behav Organ 83(3):583–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Langville AN, Meyer CD (2004) Deeper inside pagerank. Internet Math 1:2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Meyers LA (2007) Contact network epidemiology: bond percolation applied to infectious disease prediction and control. Bull Am Math Soc 44(63):86Google Scholar
  61. Mistrulli PE (2011) Assessing financial contagion in the interbank market: maximum entropy versus observed interbank lending patterns. J Bank Finance 35(5):1114–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moore K, Zhou C (2012) Identifying systemically important financial institutions: Size and other determinants. Technical report, mimeoGoogle Scholar
  63. Newman M (2002) Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys Rev E 66(1):016128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Newman M (2004) Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E 70:056131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Newman ME (2010) Networks, an introduction. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nier E, Yang J, Yorulmazer T, Alentorn A (2007) Network models and financial stability. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. In: Tenth workshop on economic heterogeneous interacting agents, vol 31(6) pp 2033–2060Google Scholar
  67. Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001a) Epidemic dynamics and endemic states in complex networks. Phys Rev E 63:066117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001b) Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys Rev Lett 86:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rochet J-C, Tirole J (1996) Interbank lending and systemic risk. J Money Credit Bank 28(4):733–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rosengren ES (2013) Bank capital: Lessons from the U.S. financial crisis. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements Forum on Key Regulatory and Supervisory Issues in a Basel III WorldGoogle Scholar
  71. Sheldon G, Maurer M (1998) Interbank lending and systemic risk: an empirical analysis for switzerland. Swiss J Econ Stat (SJES) 134(IV):685–704Google Scholar
  72. Soramäki K, Bech ML, Arnold J, Glass RJ, Beyeler WE (2007) The topology of interbank payment flows. Phys A 379(1):317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tarashev NA, Borio CEV, Tsatsaronis K (2009) The systemic importance of financial institutions. BIS Q Rev. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1473007
  74. Thimann C (2014) How insurers differ from banks: A primer on systemic regulation. Special Paper 3, Systemic Risk Centre. LSEGoogle Scholar
  75. Trichet J-C (2011) Intellectual challenges to financial stability analysis in the era of macro-prudential oversight. Financ Stabil Rev 15(139):149Google Scholar
  76. Upper C (2011) Simulation methods to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets. J Financ Stabil 7(3):111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Upper C, Worms A (2004) Estimating bilateral exposures in the german interbank market: is there a danger of contagion? Eur Econ Rev 48(4):827–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Virkar Y, Clauset A et al (2014) Power-law distributions in binned empirical data. Ann Appl Stat 8(1):89–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wagner W (2010) Diversification at financial institutions and systemic crises. J Financ Intermed 19(3):373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zawadowski A (2013) Entangled financial systems. Rev Financ Stud 26(5):1291–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of LeuvenLouvainBelgium
  2. 2.National Bank of BelgiumBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
  4. 4.Complexity Lab in EconomicsMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations