Advertisement

Computational Management Science

, Volume 16, Issue 1–2, pp 47–69 | Cite as

Optimal strategies with option compensation under mean reverting returns or volatilities

  • Stefano Herzel
  • Marco NicolosiEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

We study the problem of a fund manager whose contractual incentive is given by the sum of a constant and a variable term. The manager has a power utility function and the continuous time stochastic processes driving the dynamics of the market prices exhibit mean reversion either in the volatilities or in the expected returns. We provide an approximation for the optimal wealth and for the optimal strategy based on affine processes and the fast Fourier transform.

Keywords

Investment analysis Portfolio management Convex incentives Optimal control Fourier transform Mean reverting processes 

References

  1. Aumann RJ, Perles M (1965) A variational problem arising in economics. J Math Anal Appl 11:488–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barucci E, La Bua G, Marazzina D (2017) On relative performance, remuneration and risk taking of asset managers. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  3. Basak S, Pavlova A, Shapiro A (2007) Optimal asset allocation and risk shifting in money management. Rev Financ Stud 20(5):1583–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjerksund P, Stensland G (2011) Closed form spread option valuation. Quant Finance 14:1785–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caldana R, Fusai G (2013) A general closed-form spread option pricing formula. J Bank Finance 37:4893–4906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter JN (2000) Does option compensation increase managerial risk appetite? J Finance 55:2311–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cochrane JH (2011) Presidential address: discount rates. J Finance 66:1047–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox JC, Huang CF (1989) Optimal consumptions and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process. J Econ Theory 49:33–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dempster MAH, Hong SSG (2002) Spread option valuation and the fast Fourier transform. In: Geman H, Madan D, Pliska SR, Vorst T (eds) Mathematical finance Bachelier Congress 2000. Springer finance. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Devers CE, Cannella AA Jr, Reilly GP, Yoder ME (2007) Executive compensation: a multidisciplinary review of recent developments. J Manag 33(6):1016–1072Google Scholar
  11. Duffie D, Kan R (1996) A yield-factor model of interest rates. Math Finance 6:379–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goetzmann WN, Ingersoll JE, Ross SA (2003) High water marks and hedge fund management contracts. J Finance 58(4):1685–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karatzas I, Shreve SE (1998) Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. In: Axler S, Gehring FW, Ribet KA (eds) Graduate texts in mathematics, vol 113. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicolosi M (2017) Optimal strategy for a fund manager with option compensation. Decis Econ Finance.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-017-0204-x Google Scholar
  15. Nicolosi M, Angelini F, Herzel S (2017) Portfolio management with benchmark related incentives under mean reverting processes. Ann Oper Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2535-y
  16. Stein EM, Stein JC (1991) Stock price distributions with stochastic volatility: an analytic approach. Rev Financ Stud 4:727–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wachter JA (2002) Portfolio and consumption decisions under mean-reverting returns: an exact solution for complete markets. J Financ Quant Anal 37:63–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Rome, Tor VergataRomeItaly
  2. 2.University of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations