Computational Management Science

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 259–286 | Cite as

Adaptive management of energy transitions in long-term climate change

  • Jürgen ScheffranEmail author
Original Paper


The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) demands stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations at levels that prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. This requires an unprecedented degree of international action for emission reductions and technological change in the energy sector. Extending the established optimal control approach, the paper combines the concepts of adaptive control, inverse modeling and local optimization to climate change decision-making and management. An alternative decision model is described where controls are adjusted towards a moving target under changing conditions. A framework for integrated assessment is introduced, where a basic climate model is coupled to an economic production function with energy as a production factor, which is controlled by the allocation of investments to alternative energy technologies. Investment strategies are shaped by value functions, including utility, costs and climate damages for a given future time horizon, which are translated into admissible emission limits to keep atmospheric carbon concentrations and global mean temperature asymptotically below a given threshold. Conditions for switching between management and technology paths with different costs and carbon intensities are identified. To take account of the substantial uncertainties, an exemplary case discusses the sensitivity of the results to variation of crucial parameters, in particular time discounting, climate damage, taxes and time horizon for decision-making.


Adaptive Control Adaptive Management Emission Trading Adaptation Rule Climate Damage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen MR, Stott PA, Mitchell JFB, Schnur R, Delworth TL (2000). Quantifying the uncertainty in forecasts of anthropogenic climate change. Nature 407:617–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alley RB, Marotzke J, Nordhaus WD, Overpeck JT, Peteet DM, Pielke RA, Pierrehumbert RT, Rhines PB, Stocker TF, Talley LD, Wallace JM (2003). Abrupt climate change. Science 299 (5615):2005–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andronova NG, Schlesinger ME (2001). Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity. J Geophys Res 106(D19) 22:605–612Google Scholar
  4. Aubin JP, Saint-Pierre P (2005). A viability approach to global climate change. In: Haurie A, Vigier L (eds) Coupling Climate and Economic Dynamics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 113–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruckner T, Petschel-Held G, Toth FL, Helm C, Leimbach M, Schellnhuber HJ (1999). Climate change decision-support and the tolerable windows approach. Environ Model Assess (4):217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dumont G, Huzmezan M (2002) Concepts, methods and techniques in adaptive control. Available at: Scholar
  7. Edenhofer O, Lessmann K, Kemfert C, Grubb M, Köhler J (2006) Induced technological change: exploring its implications for the economics of atmospheric stabilization. Energy J March:57–108Google Scholar
  8. Forest CE, Stone PH, Sokolov AP, Allen MR, Webster MD (2002). Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science 295: 113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Füssel HM (2006) Social welfare functions in global climate-economy models: A critical review, Paper presented at: Third World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Kyoto, Japan, 3–7 July 2006Google Scholar
  10. Hasselmann K (1998). Conventional and Bayesian approach to climate-change detection and attribution. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124(552):2541–2565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haurie A, Viguier L (eds) (2005). Coupling climate and economic dynamics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Third Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press, 2001Google Scholar
  13. Kaya Y (1990) Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, Paris (mimeo)Google Scholar
  14. Keller K, Bolker BM, Bradford DF (2004). Uncertain climate thresholds and optimal economic growth. J Environ Econ Manage 48(1):723–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleinen T (2005) Stochastic Information in the Assessment of Climate Change. PhD Thesis, University PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Köhler J, Grubb M, Popp D, Edenhofer O (2006) The transition to endogenous technical change in climate-economy models: a technical overview to the innovation modeling comparison project. Energy J March:17–56Google Scholar
  17. Kriegler E (2005) Imprecise probability analysis for integrated assessment of climate change. PhD Thesis, Potsdam University, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  18. Kriegler E, Held H, Bruckner T (2007). Climate protection strategies under ambiguity about catastrophic consequences. In: Kropp, J, Scheffran J (eds) Decision making and risk management in sustainability science. Nova Scientific Publications, NY (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  19. Lempert RJ (2002). A new decision sciences for complex systems. Proc Nat Acad Sci 99: 7309–7313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcellino M, Salmon M (2002). Robust decision theory and the lucas critique. Macroecon Dyn 6:167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004). Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nordhaus WD (1993). Rolling the DICE: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Res Energy Econ 15:27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nordhaus WD, Boyer J (2000). Warming the world: economics models of global warming. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Neill BC, Oppenheimer M (2002). Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto Protocol. Science 296:1971–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ott K, Klepper G, Lingner S, Schäfer A, Scheffran J, Sprinz D (2004). Reasoning Goals of Climate Protection - Specification of Art.2 UNFCCC. Federal Environmental Agency, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. Petschel-Held G, Schellnhuber HJ, Bruckner T, Toth FL, Hasselmann K (1999) The tolerable windows approach. Clim Change (41):303–331Google Scholar
  27. Rethinaraj TSG (2005) Modeling global and regional energy futures. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ACDIS research report. Available at: Research/ResReports/RethinarajRR.pdfGoogle Scholar
  28. Sastry S, Bodson M (1994). Adaptive control: stability, convergence, and robustness. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider SH (2004). Abrupt non-linear climate change, irreversibility and surprise. Global Environ Change Part A 14(3):245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scheffran J (2001). Stability and control of value-cost dynamic games. Central Eur J Oper Res 9(7):197–225Google Scholar
  31. Scheffran J (2002). Economic growth, emission reduction and the choice of energy technology in a dynamic-game framework. In: Chamoni P et al. (eds) Operations research proceedings 2001. Springer, Berlin, pp 329–336Google Scholar
  32. Scheffran J, Leimbach M (2006). Policy-business interaction in emission trading between multiple regions. In: Antes R, Letmathe P (eds) Business and emissions trading. Springer, Berlin, pp 353–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheffran J (2007) Preventing dangerous climate change: adaptive decision-making and cooperative management in long-term climate policy. In: Grover VI (eds) Climate change: kyoto - ten years and still counting. Science Publisher, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  34. Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) (2006). Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Singer CE, Rethinaraj TSG, Addy S, Durham D, Musik M, Khanna M, Kuehl B, Luo J, Quimio W, Rajendran K, Ramirez D, Qiang J, Scheffran J, Tiouririne TN, Zhang J (2007) Probability distributions for carbon emissions and atmospheric response. Climatic Change (Submitted)Google Scholar
  36. Stainforth DA, Aina T, Christensen C, Collins M, Faull N, Frame DJ, Kettleborough JA, Knight S, Martin A, Murphy JM, Piani C, Sexton D, Smith LA, Spicer RA, Thorpe AJ, Allen MR (2005). Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433:403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wigley TML, Raper SCB (2001). Interpretation of high projections for global mean warming. Science 293:451–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yohe G, Andronova N, Schlesinger M (2004). To hedge or not to hedge against an uncertain future climate. Science 306:416–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ACDISChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations