Linking energy system and macroeconomic growth models
- 265 Downloads
We compare two alternative approaches for coupling macroeconomic growth models (MGM) and energy system models (ESM). The hard-link approach integrates the techno-economics of the ESM completely into the MGM and solves one highly complex optimisation problem. The soft-link leaves the two models separate and energy supply functions are integrated into the MGM that are derived from the optimal solution of the ESM. The energy supply functions relate the price of energy computed with the ESM to the quantity of energy computed with the MGM. An iterative process exchanges price-quantity information between the models. Hence, the soft-link leads to an energy market equilibrium. But energy supply functions do not consider variable interest rates that influence the energy supply functions. This is due to the fact that ESMs are partial models that assume an exogenous interest rate; however the interest rate is computed endogenously in MGMs. This missing interaction leads to a capital market dis-equilibrium in the soft-link compared to the hard-link approach inducing a mis-allocation of investments. Extending the soft-link approach by also considering the time variable interest rate of the MGM does not improve the results. Though the computational complexity is greater the hard-link approach assures simultaneous energy and capital market equilibrium.
KeywordsModel coupling Computational economics Supply theory Capital theory Energy system model Growth model Transition dynamics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bauer N (2005) Carbon Capture and Sequestration—an Option to Buy Time? Phd Thesis, University Potsdam. Available online: http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2006/654/pdf/bauerGoogle Scholar
- Bauer N, Edenhofer O (2006) Macroeconomic effects of carbon capture and sequestration within a long-term transition towards a low-carbon society. In: 8th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Technologies, Trondheim, Norway, accepted for publicationGoogle Scholar
- Bosetti V, Carraro C, Galeotti M, Massetti E, Tavoni M (2006) WITCH: a world induced technical change hybrid model. Energy J (in press)Google Scholar
- Dorfman R, Samuelson PA, Solow R (1958) Linear programming and economic analysis, Dover Books on Mathematics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Drouet L, Haurie A, Labriete M, Thalmann P, Vielle M, Viguier L (2006) A coupled bottom-up/top-down model for GHG abatement scenarios in the Swiss housing sector. In: Loulou R, Waaub J-P, Zaccour G (eds) Energy and environment. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Gerlagh R, van der Zwaan BCC (2006) Options and instruments for a deep cut in CO2 emissions: Carbon capture or renewables, taxes or subsidies. Energy J 27(3):25–48Google Scholar
- Pitchford JD (1979) Two state variable problems. In: Pitchford JD, Stephen JT (eds) Application of control theory to economic analysis, Vol 101 of contributions to economic analysis, 2nd edn. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 127–154Google Scholar
- Rafaj P (2005) Analysis of policies contributing to sustainability of the global energy system using the Global Multi-Regional MARKAL Model (GMM). Thesis Number 16122, ETH Zuerich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar