Influence of age and gender on the occurrence and presentation of reflex syncope
- 274 Downloads
The clinical history is the cornerstone of diagnosing patients with transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). Reflex syncope is the most common cause of TLOC in patients across all ages. Knowledge of the variation in incidence and clinical features of reflex syncope by age and gender provides important background information to acquire an accurate diagnosis.
In a cohort of 503 patients presenting with TLOC we established a final diagnosis after systematic evaluation and two years of follow-up. The occurrence of prodromal signs, symptoms, and triggers in patients with reflex syncope was analyzed by both age (< 40 yrs, 40–59 yrs and ≥ 60 years) and gender.
Reflex syncope was the most frequently obtained diagnosis (60.2%) in patients of all ages presenting with TLOC. Its occurrence was higher in patients under 40 years (73.4%), than above 60 years of age (45.3%). Pallor (79.9%), dizziness (73.4%), and diaphoresis (63.0%) were the most frequently reported prodromal signs and symptoms. Most triggers and prodromal signs and symptoms were more common in patients under 40 years of age and in women.
Reflex syncope is nearly twice as common in patients under 40 years of age than in patients aged 60 years or above. Typical signs and symptoms of reflex syncope are more common in younger patients and in women. Therefore, age and gender provide important diagnostic information and can help to decide whether additional testing is necessary.
Keywordssyncope diagnosis age distribution sex signs and symptoms
Conflict of interest
The study was financially supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (numbers NHS 99/181 and 2003B156). The authors report no conflicts of interest.
- 5.Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt DG, Bergfeldt L, Blanc JJ, Bloch Thomsen PE, Van Dijk JG, Fitzpatrick A, Hohnloser S, Janousek J, Kapoor W, Kenny RA, Kulakowski P, Masotti G, Moya A, Raviele A, Sutton R, Theodorakis G, Ungar A, Wieling W (2004) Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope—update 2004. Europace 6:467–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Del Rosso A, Alboni P, Brignole M, Menozzi C, Raviele A (2005) Relation of clinical presentation of syncope to the age of patients. Am J Cardiol 10:1431–1435Google Scholar
- 11.Frey MA, Tomaselli CM, Hoffler WG (1994) Cardiovascular responses to postural changes: differences with age for women and men. J Clin Pharmacol 5:394–402Google Scholar
- 12.Fu Q, Arbab-Zadeh A, Perhonen MA, Zhang R, Zuckerman JH, Levine BD (2004) Hemodynamics of orthostatic intolerance: implications for gender differences. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1:H449–H457Google Scholar
- 16.Imholz BP, Dambrink JH, Karemaker JM, Wieling W (1990) Orthostatic circulatory control in the elderly evaluated by non-invasive continuous blood pressure measurement. Clin Sci (Lond) 1:73–79Google Scholar
- 18.Lempert T (1996) Recognizing syncope: pitfalls and surprises. J R Soc Med 7:372–375Google Scholar
- 19.Lipsitz LA, Mukai S, Hamner J, Gagnon M, Babikian V (2000) Dynamic regulation of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity in aging and hypertension. Stroke 8:1897–1903Google Scholar
- 21.Morillo CA (2006) Evidence-based common sense: the role of clinical history for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. Eur Heart J 3:253–254Google Scholar
- 25.Sarasin FP, Pruvot E, Louis-Simonet M, Hugli OW, Sztajzel JM, Schlapfer J, Herrera M, Graz J, Berchier C, Mischler C, Yersin B (2007) Stepwise evaluation of syncope: a prospective population-based controlled study. Int J Cardiol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 31.Van Dijk N, Boer KR, Colman N, Bakker A, Stam J, Van Grieken JJ, Wilde AA, Linzer M, Reitsma JB, Wieling W (2008) High diagnostic yield and accuracy of history, physical examination, and ECG in patients with transient loss of consciousness in FAST: the Fainting Assessment study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1:48–55Google Scholar
- 34.Wieling W, Veerman DP, Dambrink JH, Imholz BP (1992) Disparities in circulatory adjustment to standing between young and elderly subjects explained by pulse contour analysis. Clin Sci (Lond) 2:149–155Google Scholar