Impaired circadian rhythm of gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with multiple system atrophy
- 55 Downloads
In order to evaluate gastric motility and its circadian rhythm in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and healthy control subjects, we measured gastric myoelectrical activity (GMA) for 24 hours using a cutaneous electrogastrogram (EGG) recorder in 14 MSA patients and 9 age-matched controls.We analyzed six 10-minute segments of EGG before and after each meal and two 20-minute EGG segments during sleep; three parameters were used for the analysis: dominant frequency (DF), instability coefficient of dominant frequency (ICDF), and dominant power (DP). DF increased during daytime and decreased during sleep in the control, while this circadian variation was blunted in the patients with MSA. The average DF of the eight segments in the MSA patients did not differ from that of the control. Both MSA patients and control subjects did not show the circadian variation of ICDF and DP. The average ICDF of the eight segments in the patients with MSA was significantly decreased when compared with that of the control (p<0.01). No differences were observed in DP between the two groups. This study indicates that the healthy subjects appear to have a circadian rhythm of DF, and the patients with MSA appear to have impaired circadian rhythm of DF and decreased ICDF possibly due to the degeneration of the central autonomic neurons.
Key wordselectrogastrography gastric myoelectrical activity multiple system atrophy circadian rhythm
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Berkowits DM, McCallum RW (1980) Interaction of levodopa and metochlopramide on gastric emptying. Clin Pharmacol Ther 27:414–420Google Scholar
- 4.Chen JD, McCallum RW (1994) Electrogastrographic parameters and their clinical significance. In: Chen JD, McCallum RW (eds) Electrogastrography: Principles and applications. Raven Press,New York, pp 45–73Google Scholar
- 8.Kohagen KR, Kim MS, McDonnel WM, Chey WD, Owyang C, Hasler WL (1996) Nicotine effects on prostaglandin-dependent gastric slow wave rhythmicity and antral motility in nonsmokers and smokers. Gastroenterol 110:3–11Google Scholar
- 9.Lantos PL (1997) Multiple system atrophy. Brain Pathology 7:1293–1297Google Scholar
- 18.Quinn N (1996) Multiple system atrophy. In: Marsden CD, Fahn S (eds) Movement disorders 3. Butterworths, London, pp 262–281Google Scholar
- 20.Smout AJPM, Jebbink HJA, Samsom M (1994) Acquisition and analysis of electrogastrographic data—the Dutch experience. In: Chen JD, McCallum RW (eds) Electrogastrography: Principles and applications. Raven Press, New York, pp 3–3Google Scholar
- 22.Takahashi T, Kurosawa S, Wiley J, Owyang C (1991) Mechanism for the gastrokinetic action of domperidone. Gastroenterol 101:703–710Google Scholar
- 23.Van Nueten JM, Shuurkes AJ (1984) Studies on the role of dopamine and dopamine blockers in gastroduodenal motility. Scand J Gastroenterol (Suppl) 96:89–99Google Scholar
- 24.Verhagen M, van Schelven L, Samsom M, Smout A (1999) Pitfalls in the analysis of electrogastrographic recordings. Gastroenterol 117:453–460Google Scholar
- 25.Weber J, Kohatsu S (1970) Pacemaker localization and electrical conduction patterns in the canine stomach. Gastroenterol 59:717–726Google Scholar
- 26.Wingate DL (1999) Autonomic function and dysfunction in the gastrointestinal tract. In: Mathias CJ, Bannister R (eds) Autonomic failure. A textbook of clinical disorder of the autonomic nervous system.Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 271–282Google Scholar