Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 206–210 | Cite as

Integrating an Ontology of Radiology Differential Diagnosis with ICD-10-CM, RadLex, and SNOMED CT

  • Ross W. Filice
  • Charles E. KahnJrEmail author


An ontology offers a human-readable and machine-computable representation of the concepts in a domain and the relationships among them. Mappings between ontologies enable the reuse and interoperability of biomedical knowledge. We sought to map concepts of the Radiology Gamuts Ontology (RGO), an ontology that links diseases and imaging findings to support differential diagnosis in radiology, to terms in three key vocabularies for clinical radiology: the International Classification of Diseases, version 10, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), the Radiological Society of North America’s radiology lexicon (RadLex), and the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT). RGO (version 0.7; Jan 2018) incorporated 16,918 terms (classes) for diseases, interventions, and imaging observations linked by 1782 subsumption (class-subclass) relations and 55,569 causal (“may cause”) relations. RGO classes were mapped to RadLex (46,656 classes, version 3.15), SNOMED CT (347,358 classes, version 2018AA), and ICD-10-CM (94,645 classes, version 2018AA) using the National Center for Biomedical Ontology (NCBO) Annotator web service. We identified 1275 exact mappings from RGO to RadLex, 5302 to SNOMED CT, and 941 to ICD-10-CM. RGO terms mapped to one ontology (n = 3401), two ontologies (n = 1515), or all three ontologies (n = 198). The mapped ontologies provide additional terms to support data mining from textual information in the electronic health record. The current work builds on efforts to map RGO to ontologies of diseases and phenotypes. Mappings between ontologies can support automated knowledge discovery, diagnostic reasoning, and data mining.


Ontology Differential diagnosis Radiology Gamuts ICD RadLex SNOMED 



  1. 1.
    Bodenreider O: Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support. Yearb Med Inform 67–79, 2008Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Budovec JJ, Lam CA, Kahn CE Jr: Radiology Gamuts Ontology: differential diagnosis for the Semantic Web. RadioGraphics 34:254–264, 2014Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kahn CE Jr: Transitive closure of subsumption and causal relations in a large ontology for radiology diagnosis. J Biomed Inform 61:27–33, 2016Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barta A, McNeill G, Meli P, Wall K, Zeisset A: ICD-10-CM primer. J AHIMA 79:64–66, 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jonassen K, Saboe R: The use of text encoding in the development of a terminology and knowledge system associated with the Norwegian version of the ICD-10. Medinfo 8 Pt 1:51–55, 1995Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang KC: Standard lexicons, coding systems and ontologies for interoperability and semantic computation in imaging. J Digit Imaging 31:353–360, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langlotz CP: RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. RadioGraphics 26:1595–1597, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rubin DL: Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging 21:355–362, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langlotz CP, Caldwell SA: The completeness of existing lexicons for representing radiology report information. J Digit Imaging 15(Suppl 1):201–205, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shore MW, Rubin DL, Kahn CE Jr: Integration of imaging signs into RadLex. J Digit Imaging 25:50–55, 2012Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee D, de Keizer N, Lau F, Cornet R: Literature review of SNOMED CT use. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21:e11–e19, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonquet C, Shah NH, Musen MA: The open biomedical annotator. Summit Transl Bioinform 2009:56–60, 2009Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shah NH, Bhatia N, Jonquet C, Rubin D, Chiang AP, Musen MA: Comparison of concept recognizers for building the Open Biomedical Annotator. BMC Bioinformatics 10(Suppl 9):S14, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noy NF, Shah NH, Whetzel PL, Dai B, Dorf M, Griffith N, Jonquet C, Rubin DL, Storey MA, Chute CG, Musen MA: BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 37:W170–W173, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whetzel PL, Noy NF, Shah NH, Alexander PR, Nyulas C, Tudorache T, Musen MA: BioPortal: enhanced functionality via new Web services from the National Center for Biomedical Ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W541–W545, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dhombres F, Bodenreider O: Interoperability between phenotypes in research and healthcare terminologies--investigating partial mappings between HPO and SNOMED CT. J Biomed Semantics 7:3, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kahn CE Jr: Integrating ontologies of rare diseases and radiological diagnosis. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 22:1164–1168, 2015Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kahn CE Jr: An ontology-based approach to estimate the frequency of rare diseases in narrative-text radiology reports. Stud Health Technol Inform 245:896–900, 2017Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rector A, Iannone L: Lexically suggest, logically define: quality assurance of the use of qualifiers and expected results of post-coordination in SNOMED CT. J Biomed Inform 45:199–209, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Denny JC, Ritchie MD, Basford MA, Pulley JM, Bastarache L, Brown-Gentry K, Wang D, Masys DR, Roden DM, Crawford DC: PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics 26:1205–1210, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schulz S, Rodrigues JM, Rector A, Chute CG: Interface terminologies, reference terminologies and aggregation terminologies: a strategy for better integration. Stud Health Technol Inform 245:940–944, 2017Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    National Research Council: Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haendel MA, Chute CG, Robinson PN: Classification, ontology, and precision medicine. N Engl J Med 379:1452–1462, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyMedStar Georgetown University HospitalWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations