Advertisement

Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 870–879 | Cite as

ETL Framework for Real-Time Business Intelligence over Medical Imaging Repositories

  • Tiago Marques Godinho
  • Rui LebreEmail author
  • João Rafael Almeida
  • Carlos Costa
Article

Abstract

In the last decades, the amount of medical imaging studies and associated metadata has been rapidly increasing. Despite being mostly used for supporting medical diagnosis and treatment, many recent initiatives claim the use of medical imaging studies in clinical research scenarios but also to improve the business practices of medical institutions. However, the continuous production of medical imaging studies coupled with the tremendous amount of associated data, makes the real-time analysis of medical imaging repositories difficult using conventional tools and methodologies. Those archives contain not only the image data itself but also a wide range of valuable metadata describing all the stakeholders involved in the examination. The exploration of such technologies will increase the efficiency and quality of medical practice. In major centers, it represents a big data scenario where Business Intelligence (BI) and Data Analytics (DA) are rare and implemented through data warehousing approaches. This article proposes an Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) framework for medical imaging repositories able to feed, in real-time, a developed BI (Business Intelligence) application. The solution was designed to provide the necessary environment for leading research on top of live institutional repositories without requesting the creation of a data warehouse. It features an extensible dashboard with customizable charts and reports, with an intuitive web-based interface that empowers the usage of novel data mining techniques, namely, a variety of data cleansing tools, filters, and clustering functions. Therefore, the user is not required to master the programming skills commonly needed for data analysts and scientists, such as Python and R.

Keywords

PACS Business Intelligence DICOM Data Analytics Cloud Big data 

Notes

Funding Information

Tiago Marques Godinho is funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) under grant agreement SFRH/BD/104647/2014. Rui Lebre received support by the Integrated Programme of SR&TD “SOCA” (Ref.CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000010), co-funded by Centro 2020 program, Portugal 2020, European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund. This work has received support from the ERDF European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalization, COMPETE 2020 Programme, and by National Funds through the FCT, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia within the project PTDC/EEI-ESS/6815/2014.

References

  1. 1.
    Hamilton B: Big data is the future of healthcare. Teaneck: Cognizant, 2012Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Godinho TM, Viana-Ferreira C, Bastiao Silva LA, Costa C: A routing mechanism for cloud outsourcing of medical imaging repositories. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 20(1):367–375, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2014.2361633 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santos M, Bastiao L, Costa C, Silva A, Rocha N: “Clinical Data Mining in Small Hospital PACS: Contributions for Radiology Department Improvement,” in Information Systems and Technologies for Enhancing Health and Social Care. Hershey: IGI Global, 2013, pp. 236–251Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mildenberger P, Eichelberg M, Martin E: Introduction to the DICOM standard. Eur Radiol 12(4):920–927, 1, 2002.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300101100 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 3: Information object definitions, NEMA, Standard, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 7: Message Exchange, NEMA, Standard, 2017.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pianykh OS: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM): a practical introduction and survival guide, Vol. 26. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009, 424 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang S, Pavlicek W, Roberts CC, Langer SG, Zhang M, Hu M, Morin RL, Schueler BA, Wellnitz CV, Wu T: An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring. J Digit Imaging 24(2):223–233, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9329-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hu M, Pavlicek W, Liu PT, Zhang M, Langer SG, Wang S, Place V, Miranda R, Wu TT: Informatics in radiology: efficiency metrics for imaging device productivity. RadioGraphics 31(2):603–616, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.312105714 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ondategui-Parra S, Erturk SM, Ros PR: Survey of the use of quality indicators in academic radiology departments. Am J Roentgenol 187(5):W451–W455, 1, 2006.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V: Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst 2(1):3, 1, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2501-2-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nagy PG, Warnock MJ, Daly M, Toland C, Meenan CD et al.: Informatics in radiology: automated Web-based graphical dashboard for radiology operational business intelligence. RadioGraphics 29(7):1897–1906, 1, 2009.  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.297095701 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andreu-Perez J, Poon CCY, Merrifield RD, Wong STC, Yang G-Z: Big data for health. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 19(4):1193–1208, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2015.2450362 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Viceconti M, Hunter P, Hose R: Big data, big knowledge: big data for personalized healthcare. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 19(4):1209–1215, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2015.2406883 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Langer SG: Challenges for data storage in medical imaging research. J Digit Imaging 24(2):203–207, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9311-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Watson HJ, Wixom BH: The current state of business intelligence. Computer 40(9):96–99, 2007.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen H, Chiang RHL, Storey VC: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q 36(4):1165–1188, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Langer SG: A flexible database architecture for mining DICOM objects: the DICOM data warehouse. J Digit Imaging 25(2):206–212, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9434-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. T. L. Wang, M. J. Zaki, H. T. T. Toivonen, and D. Shasha, Introduction to Data Mining in Bioinformatics. In: Data Mining in Bioinformatics, Springer, London, 2005, pp. 3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-059-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Valente F, Silva LAB, Godinho TM, Costa C: Anatomy of an extensible open source PACS. J Digit Imaging, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9834-0
  21. 21.
    Costa C, Freitas F, Pereira M, Silva A, Oliveira JL: Indexing and retrieving DICOM data in disperse and unstructured archives. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4(1):71–77, 1, 2009.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0269-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bastiao L, Santos M, Costa C, Silva A, Rocha N: Dicoogle statistics: Analyzing efficiency and service quality of digital imaging laboratories. Heildelberg: Springer, 2013Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Santos M, Bastiao L, Costa C, Silva A, Rocha N: Dicom and clinical data mining in a small hospital pacs: A pilot study. In: International Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2011, pp. 254–263Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Aveiro, DETI/IEETA, Campus Universitário de SantiagoAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Information and Communications TechnologiesUniversity of A CoruñaA CoruñaSpain

Personalised recommendations