Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 443–449 | Cite as

Radiologists’ Usage of Social Media: Results of the RANSOM Survey

  • Erik R. RanschaertEmail author
  • Peter M. A. Van Ooijen
  • Geraldine B. McGinty
  • Paul M Parizel


The growing use of social media is transforming the way health care professionals (HCPs) are communicating. In this changing environment, it could be useful to outline the usage of social media by radiologists in all its facets and on an international level. The main objective of the RANSOM survey was to investigate how radiologists are using social media and what is their attitude towards them. The second goal was to discern differences in tendencies among American and European radiologists. An international survey was launched on SurveyMonkey ( asking questions about the platforms they prefer, about the advantages, disadvantages, and risks, and about the main incentives and barriers to use social media. A total of 477 radiologists participated in the survey, of which 277 from Europe and 127 from North America. The results show that 85 % of all survey participants are using social media, mostly for a mixture of private and professional reasons. Facebook is the most popular platform for general purposes, whereas LinkedIn and Twitter are more popular for professional usage. The most important reason for not using social media is an unwillingness to mix private and professional matters. Eighty-two percent of all participants are aware of the educational opportunities offered by social media. The survey results underline the need to increase radiologists’ skills in using social media efficiently and safely. There is also a need to create clear guidelines regarding the online and social media presence of radiologists to maximize the potential benefits of engaging with social media.


Radiology Internet Social media Twitter messaging 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. 1.
    Lipp A, Davis RE, Peter R, Davies JS: The use of social media among health care professionals within an online postgraduate diabetes diploma course. Practical Diabetes 31(1):14–17a, 2014. doi: 10.1002/pdi.1821 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zember WF, Fishman EK, Horton KM, Raman SP: How Social Media Can Impact Medicine and Radiology. JACR 12(6):620–621, 2015PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mesko B: Social Media in Clinical Practice. Springer, London, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pew Research Center. Social Media Update 2014. Available at Accessed 21 September 2015
  5. 5.
    Pew Research Center. Three Technology Revolutions. Available at Accessed 21 September 2015
  6. 6.
    Antheunis ML, Tates K, Nieboer TE: Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns 92(3):426–431, 2013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ventola CL: Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P T 39(7):491–520, 2014PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glover M, Choy G, Boland GW, Saini S, Prabhakar AM: Radiology and Social Media: Are Private Practice Radiology Groups More Social Than Academic Radiology Departments? J Am Coll Radiol 12(5):513–518, 2015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Budd L: Physician tweet thyself: A guide for integrating social media into medical practice. BCMJ 5(1):38–40, 2013Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    DeCamp M, Koenig TW, Chisolm MS: Social media and physicians’ online identity crisis. JAMA 310(6):581–582, 2013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee JL, DeCamp M, Dredze M, Chisolm MS, Berger ZD: What are health-related users tweeting? A qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on twitter J Med Internet Res 16(10), e237, 2014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Power DMS. Available at Accessed 22 September 2015
  13. 13.
    Brown J: How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey. J Med Internet Res 16(12):e267, 2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ranschaert ER, van Ooijen PMA, Lee S, Ratib O, Parizel PM, Parizel P: Social media for radiologists, an introduction. Insights Imaging, September, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0430-0 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Medical Imaging Talk Blog. Available at Accessed 22 September 2015
  16. 16.
    Prabhu V, Rosenkrantz AB: Enriched Audience Engagement Through Twitter: Should More Academic Radiology Departments Seize the Opportunity? J Am Coll Radiol12(7):756–9, 2015Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hawkins CM, Duszak R, Rawson JV: Social media in radiology: early trends in Twitter microblogging at radiology's largest international meeting. J Am Coll Radiol 11(4):387–390, 2014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    The ASNR 2015 TweetUp. Available at Accessed 22 September 2015
  19. 19.
    AJNR Tweetchat 4/7/15 - Social media in Scientific Meetings. Available at Accessed 22 September 2015
  20. 20.
    Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. J Med Internet Res 14(5):e117, 2012Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik R. Ranschaert
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter M. A. Van Ooijen
    • 2
  • Geraldine B. McGinty
    • 3
  • Paul M Parizel
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis‘s-HertogenboschThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyAntwerp University Hospital and University of AntwerpEdegemBelgium

Personalised recommendations