Use of Digital Whole Slide Imaging in Dermatopathology
- 263 Downloads
Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation, with specific challenges for dermatopathology, yet little is known about pathologists’ practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI for interpretation of melanocytic lesions. A national sample of pathologists (N = 207) was recruited from 864 invited pathologists from ten US states (CA, CT, HI, IA, KY, LA, NJ, NM, UT, and WA). Pathologists who had interpreted melanocytic lesions in the past year were surveyed in this cross-sectional study. The survey included questions on pathologists’ experience, WSI practice patterns and perceptions using a 6-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists’ use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were between 40 and 59 years of age (62 %) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (71 %). Use of WSI was seen more often among dermatopathologists and participants affiliated with an academic medical center. Experience with WSI was reported by 41 %, with the most common type of use being for education and testing (CME, board exams, and teaching in general, 71 %), and clinical use at tumor boards and conferences (44 %). Most respondents (77 %) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and 59 % agreed that benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. However, 78 % of pathologists reported that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (49 %) or not (51 %). The majority of pathologists who interpret melanocytic lesions do not use WSI, but among pathologists who do, use is largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.
KeywordsDigital whole slide imaging Melanocytic lesions Dermatopathology
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01 CA151306.
- 6.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/Overview/ClassifyYourDevice/. Accessed 20 Oct 2014
- 12.Brick KE, Sluzevich JC, Cappel MA, et al: Comparison of virtual microscopy and glass slide microscopy during a simulated in-training examination. American Society of Dermatopathology 49th Annua Meeting, October 11–14, 2012, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- 17.Wong SL, Balch CM, Hurley P, Agarwala SS, Akhurst TJ, Cochran A, et al: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 30(23):2912–2918, 2012. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.3519 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Wong SL, Balch CM, Hurley P, Agarwala SS, Akhurst TJ, Cochran A, et al: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guideline. Ann Surg Oncol 19(11):3313–3324, 2012. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2475-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Direct Medical Data, LLC. http://www.dmddata.com/data_lists_physicians.asp. Accessed 1 Jun 2015
- 20.Willis, Gordon B: Cognitive Interviewing: A “How To” Guide. In Meeting of the American Statistical Association. 1999Google Scholar
- 22.Elmore JG. Accuracy in the diagnosis of melanoma and the impact of double reading. Baseline Survey. http://sph.washington.edu/faculty/fac_bio.asp?url_ID=Elmore_Joann. 2015. Accessed 1 Jun 2015
- 25.Cerroni L, Barnhill R, Elder D, Gottlieb G, Heenan P, Kutzner H, LeBoit PE, Mihm M, Jr., Rosai J, Kerl H: Melanocytic tumors of uncertain malignant potential (MELTUMPs): Results of a Tutorial held at the XXIX Symposium of the International Society of Dermatopathology in Graz, October 2008. Am J Surg Pathol 34(3):314–326, 2010Google Scholar
- 29.Reyes C, Ikpatt OF, Nadji M, Cote RJ: Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies. J Pathol Inform 1–5, 2014. 10.4103/2153-3539.127814
- 30.Cann J, Chlipala E, Ellin J, Kawano Y, Knight B, Long RE, Lowe A, Machotka SV, Smith A: Validation of digital pathology systems in the regulated nonclinical environment. Digital Pathology Association white paper. 2011, https://digitalpathologyassociation.org/white-papers_1