Advertisement

Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 702–713 | Cite as

Integrated Image Data and Medical Record Management for Rare Disease Registries. A General Framework and its Instantiation to the German Calciphylaxis Registry

  • Thomas M. DesernoEmail author
  • Daniel Haak
  • Vincent Brandenburg
  • Verena Deserno
  • Christoph Classen
  • Paula Specht
Article

Abstract

Especially for investigator-initiated research at universities and academic institutions, Internet-based rare disease registries (RDR) are required that integrate electronic data capture (EDC) with automatic image analysis or manual image annotation. We propose a modular framework merging alpha-numerical and binary data capture. In concordance with the Office of Rare Diseases Research recommendations, a requirement analysis was performed based on several RDR databases currently hosted at Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany. With respect to the study management tool that is already successfully operating at the Clinical Trial Center Aachen, the Google Web Toolkit was chosen with Hibernate and Gilead connecting a MySQL database management system. Image and signal data integration and processing is supported by Apache Commons FileUpload-Library and ImageJ-based Java code, respectively. As a proof of concept, the framework is instantiated to the German Calciphylaxis Registry. The framework is composed of five mandatory core modules: (1) Data Core, (2) EDC, (3) Access Control, (4) Audit Trail, and (5) Terminology as well as six optional modules: (6) Binary Large Object (BLOB), (7) BLOB Analysis, (8) Standard Operation Procedure, (9) Communication, (10) Pseudonymization, and (11) Biorepository. Modules 1–7 are implemented in the German Calciphylaxis Registry. The proposed RDR framework is easily instantiated and directly integrates image management and analysis. As open source software, it may assist improved data collection and analysis of rare diseases in near future.

Keywords

Clinical trial Rare disease registry Electronic data capture Data management Image management Image processing Image annotation 

References

  1. 1.
    Rubinstein YR, Groft SC, Bartek R, Brown K, Christensen RA, Collier E, Farber A, Farmer J, Ferguson JH, Forrest CB, Lockhart NC, McCurdy KR, Moore H, Pollen GB, Rangel Miller RV, Hullm S, Vaught J: Creating a global rare disease patient registry linked to a rare diseases biorepository database: Rare Disease-HUB (RD-HUB). Contemp Clin Trials 31:394–404, 2010PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bellgard M, Beroud C, Parkinson K, Harris T, Ayme S, Baynam G, Weeramanthri T, Dawkins H, Hunter A: Dispelling myths about rare disease registry system development. Source Code Biol Med 8(1):21, 2013PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellgard MI, Macgregor A, Janon F, Harvey A, O’Leary P, Hunter A, Dawkins H: A modular approach to disease registry design: successful adoption of an internet-based rare disease registry. Hum Mutat 33(10):E2356–E2366, 2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Messiaen C, Le Mignot L, Rath A, Richard JB, Dufour E, Ben Said M, Jais JP, Verloes A, Le Merrer M, Bodemer C, Baujat G, Gerard-Blanluet M, Bourdon-Lanoy E, Salomon R, Ayme S, Landais P: CEMARA: a Web dynamic application within a N-tier architecture for rare diseases. Stud Health Technol Inform 136:51–56, 2008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seo H, Kim D, Chae JH, Kang HG, Lim BC, Cheong HI, Kim JH: Development of Korean rare disease knowledge base. Healthc Inform Res 18(4):272–278, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stausberg J, Altmann A, Antony G, Drepper J, Sax U, Schütt A: Register for networked medical research in Germany. Appl Clin Inform 1(4):408–418, 2010PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drepper J, Semler SC (ed). IT infrastructure in patient-centered research. State of the art and required actions (German). Technical report. IT-Reviewing Board of TMF. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft AKA GmbH, Berlin, 2013 (ISBN 978-3-89838-690-6)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ayme S (ed). Disease Registries in Europe. Orphanet Report Series, Rare Diseases Collection. Orphanet Technical Report. Jan 2013. Availabe at: http://www.orpha.net/orphacom/cahiers/docs/GB/Registries.pdf
  9. 9.
    Souza MP, Miller VR: Significance of patient registries for dermatological disorders. J Investig Dermatol 132:1749–1752, 2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG: Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381, 2009PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Natter MD, Quan J, Ortiz DM, Bousvaros A, Ilowite NT, Inman CJ, Marsolo K, McMurry AJ, Sandborg CI, Schanberg LE, Wallace CA, Warren RW, Weber GM, Mandl KD: An i2b2-based, generalizable, open source, self-scaling chronic disease registry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20:172–179, 2013PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kohane IS, Churchill SE, Murphy SN: A translational engine at the national scale: informatics for integrating biology and the bedside. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19:181e5, 2012Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang X, Martinez C, Wang J, Liu Y, Liu BJ. Development of a user customizable imaging informatics-based intelligent workflow engine system to enhance rehabilitation clinical trials. Proceedings SPIE 2014; 9039, in pressGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Langer S, Bartholmai B: Imaging informatics: challenges in multi-site imaging trials. J Digit Imaging 24(1):151–159, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9282-9 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erickson BJ, Pan T, Marcus DS: CTSA Imaging Informatics Project Group. Whitepapers on imaging infrastructure for research: Part 1: General workflow considerations. J Digit Imaging 25(4):449–453, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marcus DS, Erickson BJ, Pan T: Imaging infrastructure for research. Part 2. Data management practices. J Digit Imaging 25(5):566–569, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prins AH, Abu-Hanna A: Requirements analysis of information services for patients on a general practitioner's website–patient and general practitioner's perspectives. Methods Inf Med 46(6):629–635, 2007PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prokosch HU, Beck A, Ganslandt T, Hummel M, Kiehntopf M, Sax U, Ückert F, Semler S: IT Infrastructure Components for Biobanking. Appl Clin Inform 1(4):419–429, 2010PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deserno TM, Deserno V, Legewie V, Schafhausen J, Eisert A, Schmidt-Kotsas A, Kirstein S, Willems J, Spitzer K, Schulz JB. IT support for translational management of clinical trials based on the Google Web Toolkits. German Medical Science (GMS) Meeting Abstract 2011: 11gmds023. (German)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brandenburg VM, Kramann R, Specht P, Ketteler M: Calciphylaxis in CKD and beyond. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(4):1314–1318, 2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brandenburg V, Specht P, Floege J, Ketteler M. Seven Years of Experience with the German CUA Registry. Abstract Presentation. American Society of Nephrology Renal Week, 2013Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deserno TM, Sarandi I, Jose A, Haak D, Jonas S, Specht P, Brandenburg V. Towards quantitative Calciphylaxis. Proceedings SPIE 2014; 9035: in pressGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jäkel J, Schmidt R, Leusmann P, Spreckelsen C, Knüchel R, Dahl E, Veeck J: Biospecimen quality management at the RWTH centralized biomaterial bank (RWTH cBMB). Pathologe 34(1):136, 2013Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hirschberg I, Knüppel H, Strech D: Practice variation across consent templates for biobank research. a survey of German biobanks. Front Genet 4:240, 2013PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nebel E, Masinter L. Form-based file upload in HTML. Request for Comments no. 1867. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Network Working Group. 1995. Available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1867.txt
  26. 26.
    Deserno TM, Haak D, Samsel C, Gehlen J, Kabino K. Integration image management and analysis into OpenClinica using web services. Proc SPIE 8674: 0F1-10, 2013Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wagner M, Glock J, Sariyar M, Borg A. PID Generator. Technical Manual. Version 1.2. Dept. of Medical Informatics and Biometry. Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany, 2008Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lehmann TM, Schubert H, Keysers D, Kohnen M, Wein BB: The IRMA code for unique classification of medical images. Proc SPIE 5033:440–451, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Part 19: Application Hosting. PS3.19-2011. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA, USA, 2011Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prior FW, Erickson BJ, Tarbox L: Open source software projects of the caBIG In Vivo Imaging Workspace Software special interest group. J Digit Imaging 20(Suppl 1):94–100, 2007PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Channin DS, Mongkolwat P, Kleper V, Sepukar K, Rubin DL: The caBIG annotation and image markup project. J Digit Imaging 23(2):217–225, 2010PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ohmann C, Kuchinke W: Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration. Methods Inf Med 48(1):45–54, 2009PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fridsma DB, Evans J, Hastak S, Mead CN: The BRIDG project: a technical report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15(2):130–137, 2008PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hullsiek KH, George M, Brown SK: Designing and managing a flexible and dynamic biorepository system: a 15-year perspective from the CPCRA, ESPRIT, and INSIGHT clinical trial networks. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 5(6):538–544, 2010PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lin MC, Vreeman DJ, McDonald CJ, Huff SM: A characterization of local LOINC mapping for laboratory tests in three large institutions. Methods Inf Med 50(2):105–114, 2011PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dugas M, Thun S, Frankewitsch T, Heitmann KU: LOINC codes for hospital information systems documents: a case study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16(3):400–403, 2009PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas M. Deserno
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Haak
    • 1
  • Vincent Brandenburg
    • 2
  • Verena Deserno
    • 3
  • Christoph Classen
    • 1
  • Paula Specht
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medical InformaticsUniklinik RWTH AachenAachenGermany
  2. 2.Medical Clinic I, Cardiology DepartmentUniklinik RWTH AachenAachenGermany
  3. 3.Clinical Trial Center AachenUniklinik RWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations