Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 165–173 | Cite as

A Centralized Platform for Geo-Distributed PACS Management

  • Luís A. Bastião Silva
  • Renato Pinho
  • Luís S. Ribeiro
  • Carlos Costa
  • José Luís Oliveira


Picture Archive and Communication System (PACS) is a globally adopted concept and plays a fundamental role in patient care flow within healthcare institutions. However, the deployment of medical imaging repositories over multiple sites still brings several practical challenges namely related to operation and management (O&M). This paper describes a Web-based centralized console that provides remote monitoring, testing, and management over multiple geo-distributed PACS. The system allows the PACS administrator to define any kind of service or operation, reducing the need for local technicians and providing a 24/7 monitoring solution.


Medical Imaging PACS Management DICOM Monitoring PACS Testing Geo-Distributed PACS 



This work was partially funded by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, under the grant agreement SFRH/BD/79389/2011. This work also has received support from the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (EMIF grant no. 115372).


  1. 1.
    P. Seifert, “IHE Radiology Technical Framework Supplement XDS-I.b Integration Profile,” 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. K. Huang, PACS and imaging informatics: basic principles and applications Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. J. Liu, H. K. Huang, F. Cao, M. Z. Zhou, J. Zhang, and G. Mogel, “Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD): A Complete Continuous-Availability PACS Archive Server1,” Radiographics, vol. 24, pp. 1203–1209, July 1, 2004 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erberich SG, Silverstein JC, Chervenak A, Schuler R, Nelson MD, Kesselman C: Globus MEDICUS - federation of DICOM medical imaging devices into healthcare Grids. Stud Health Technol Inform 126:269–78, 2007PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ribeiro LS, Costa C, Oliveira JL: Clustering of distinct PACS archives using a cooperative peer-to-peer network. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 108:1002–1011, 2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. S. Ribeiro, L. Bastião, C. Costa, and J. L. Oliveira, “Email-P2P Gateway to Distributed Medical Imaging Repositories,” in HealthInf, 2010, pp. 310–315.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Cao, B. J. Liu, H. K. Huang, M. Z. Zhou, J. Zhang, X. C. Zhang, and G. T. Mogel, “Fault-tolerant PACS server,” pp. 316–325, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Dostal, M. Javornik, K. Slavicek, and P. Ventruba, “Integration of Telemedicine Activities in the Czech Republic,” in Innovations in Information Technology, 2007. IIT 07. 4th International Conference on, 2007, pp. 611–615.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Treichel, M. Gessat, T. Prietzel, and O. Burgert, “DICOM for Implantations—Overview and Application,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 25, pp. 352–358, 2012/06/01 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Oosterwijk and P. Gihring, DICOM Basic Version 3: OTech, Incorporated, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. S. Pianykh, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM): A Practical Introduction and Survival Guide: Springer-Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. E. M. Association, “Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 18: Web Access to DICOM Persistent Objects (WADO)” 2004.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    IETF, “RCF 1157: A simple network management protocol (SNMP),” ed: The Internet Engineering Task Force, 1990, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. J. Liu, H. K. Huang, F. Cao, L. Documet, and D. A. Sarti, “Fault-tolerant back-up archive using an ASP model for disaster recovery,” pp. 89–95, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Weisser, S. Ruggiero, A. Runa, C. Düber, W. Neff, and M. Walz, “Online Availability Check of Teleradiology Components,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 20, pp. 393–401, 2007/12/01 2007.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Toland, C. Meenan, M. Warnock, and P. Nagy, “Proactively Monitoring Departmental Clinical IT Systems with an Open Source Availability System,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 20, pp. 119–124, 2007/11/01 2007.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Potter, R. Busbridge, M. Toland, and P. Nagy, “Mastering DICOM with DVTk,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 20, pp. 47–62, 2007/11/01 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benjamin M, Aradi Y, Shreiber R: From shared data to sharing workflow: merging PACS and teleradiology. Eur J Radiol 73:3–9, 2010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Warnock, C. Toland, D. Evans, B. Wallace, and P. Nagy, “Benefits of Using the DCM4CHE DICOM Archive,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 20, pp. 125–129, 2007/11/01 2007.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. A. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1999.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. G. Chowdhury, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval: Facet, 2010.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Costa C, Ferreira C, Bastião L, Ribeiro L, Silva A, Oliveira JL: Dicoogle - an Open Source Peer-to-Peer PACS. J Digit Imaging 1:1–9, 2010Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. A. B. Silva, C. Costa, and J. L. Oliveira, “DICOM relay over the cloud,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pp. 1–11, 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luís A. Bastião Silva
    • 1
  • Renato Pinho
    • 1
  • Luís S. Ribeiro
    • 1
  • Carlos Costa
    • 1
  • José Luís Oliveira
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Aveiro, DETI/IEETAAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations