Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 302–308 | Cite as

Segmentation and Visualization of a Large, High-Resolution Micro-CT Data of Mice

  • Ravishankar Chityala
  • Sridevi Pudipeddi
  • Luke Arensten
  • Susanta Hui
Article

Abstract

High-resolution large datasets were acquired to improve the understanding of murine bone physiology. The purpose of this work is to present the challenges and solutions in segmenting and visualizing bone in such large datasets acquired using micro-CT scan of mice. The analyzed dataset is more than 50 GB in size with more than 6,000 2,048 × 2,048 slices. The study was performed to automatically measure the bone mineral density (BMD) of the entire skeleton. A global Renyi entropy (GREP) method was initially used for bone segmentation. This method consistently oversegmented skeletal region. A new method called adaptive local Renyi entropy (ALREP) is proposed to improve the segmentation results. To study the efficacy of the ALREP, manual segmentation was performed. Finally, a specialized high-end remote visualization system along with the software, VirtualGL, was used to perform remote rendering of this large dataset. It was determined that GREP overestimated the bone cross-section by around 30 % compared with ALREP. The manual segmentation process took 6,300 min for 6,300 slices while ALREP took only 150 min for segmentation. Automatic image processing with ALREP method may facilitate BMD measurement of the entire skeleton in a significantly reduced time, compared with manual process.

Keyword

Segmentation Visualization High resolution Bone mineral density 

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MOV 1.11 MB)

References

  1. 1.
    Feldkamp LA, et al: The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4:3–11, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patel V, et al: Self-calibration of a cone-beam micro-CT system. Med Phys 36:48, 2009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ionita CN, et al: Cone-beam micro-CT system based on LabVIEW software. J Digit Imaging 21(3):296–305, 2008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feldkamp LA, et al: Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am 1:612–619, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Clerck NM, et al: Non-invasive high-resolution mCT of the inner structure of living animals. Microsc Anal 81:13–15, 2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Postnov AA, et al: 3D in vivo X-ray microtomography of living snails. J Microsc 205:201, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Postnov AA, et al: Quantitative analysis of bone mineral content by X-ray microtomography. Physiol Meas 24:165–167, 2003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holdsworth DW, et al: Micro-CT in small animal and specimen imaging. Trends Biotechnol 20(8):S34–S39, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Appleton CT et al: Forced mobilization accelerates pathogenesis: characterization of a preclinical surgical model of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 9:R13, 2007Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McErlain DD, et al: Study of subchondral bone adaptations in a rodent surgical model of OA using in vivo micro-computed tomography. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:458–469, 2008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Granton PV, et al: Rapid in vivo whole-body composition of rats using cone-beam micro-CT. J Appl Physiol 109(4):1162–1169, 2010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kapur JN, et al: A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram. Graph Models Image Process 29(3):273–285, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Avizo®. http://www.vsg3d.com/avizo/overview Accessed on 19 Aug 2011
  14. 14.
    Yen JC, Chang FJ, Chang S: A new criterion for automatic multilevel thresholding. IEEE Trans Image Process 4(3):370–378, 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The VirtualGL Project. http://www.virtualgl.org. Accessed on 19 Aug 2011
  16. 16.
    Hui SK, Fairchild GR, Kidder LS, Sharma M, Bhattacharya M, Jackson S, Le C, Yee D: Skeletal remodeling following clinically relevant radiation-induced bone damage treated with zoledronic acid. Calcif Tissue Int 90:40–49, 2012Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hui SK, Khalil A, Zhang Y, Coghill K, Le C, Dusenbery K, Froelich J, Yee D, Downs L: Longitudinal assessment of bone loss from diagnostic computed tomography scans in gynecologic cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(4):353.e1–7, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ravishankar Chityala
    • 1
  • Sridevi Pudipeddi
    • 2
  • Luke Arensten
    • 3
  • Susanta Hui
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.South Central CollegeMankatoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Therapeutic RadiologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  4. 4.Masonic Cancer Center, University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations