Computerized Analysis of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns on a Large Clinical Dataset of Full-Field Digital Mammograms: Robustness Study with Two High-Risk Datasets
- 278 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the robustness of our prior computerized texture analysis method for breast cancer risk assessment, which was developed initially on a limited dataset of screen-film mammograms. This current study investigated the robustness by (1) evaluating on a large clinical dataset, (2) using full-field digital mammograms (FFDM) as opposed to screen-film mammography, and (3) incorporating analyses over two types of high-risk patient sets, as well as patients at low risk for breast cancer. The evaluation included the analyses on the parenchymal patterns of women at high risk of developing of breast cancer, including both BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and unilateral cancer patients, and of women at low risk of developing breast cancer. A total of 456 cases, including 53 women with BRCA1/2 gene mutations, 75 women with unilateral cancer, and 328 low-risk women, were retrospectively collected under an institutional review board approved protocol. Regions-of-interest (ROIs), were manually selected from the central breast region immediately behind the nipple. These ROIs were subsequently used in computerized feature extraction to characterize the mammographic parenchymal patterns in the images. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the performance of the computerized texture features in the task of distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk subjects. In a round robin evaluation on the FFDM dataset with Bayesian artificial neural network analysis, AUC values of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [0.75, 0.88]) and 0.73 (95% confidence interval [0.67, 0.78]) were obtained between BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and low-risk women, and between unilateral cancer and low-risk women, respectively. These results from computerized texture analysis on digital mammograms demonstrated that high-risk and low-risk women have different mammographic parenchymal patterns. On this large clinical dataset, we validated our methods for quantitative analyses of mammographic patterns on FFDM, statistically demonstrating again that women at high risk tend to have dense breasts with coarse and low-contrast texture patterns.
KeywordsComputerized texture analysis Breast cancer risk assessment Mammographic parenchymal patterns Full-field digital mammograms Quantitative imaging analysis
This research was supported in part by the University of Chicago Breast SPORE P50-CA125183, DOE grant DE-FG02-08ER6478, NIH S10 RR021039, and P30 CA14599. M. L. Giger is a stockholder in R2 Technology/Hologic and shareholder in Quantitative Insights, and receives royalties from Hologic, GE Medical Systems, MEDIAN Technologies, Riverain Medical, Mitsubishi, and Toshiba. It is the University of Chicago Conflict of Interest Policy that investigators disclose publicly actual or potential significant financial interest that would reasonably appear to be directly and significantly affected by the research activities.
- 2.American College of Radiology: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 4th edition. American College of Radiology, Reston, Va, 2003Google Scholar
- 3.Wolfe JN: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1139, 1976Google Scholar
- 7.Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Stone J, et al: Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Cancer Prev 3:314–321, 2001Google Scholar
- 26.Huberty CJ: Applied Discriminant Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 1994Google Scholar
- 27.Lachenbruch PL: Discriminant Analysis. Hafer, London, England, 1975Google Scholar
- 29.ROC software, http://www-radiology.uchicago.edu/krl/roc_soft6.htm
- 30.Holm S: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70, 1979Google Scholar
- 31.Johnson RA, Wichern DW: Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992Google Scholar