Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 151–159 | Cite as

Imaging Informatics: Challenges in Multi-site Imaging Trials



Multi-site imaging research has several specialized needs that are substantially different from what is commonly available in clinical imaging systems. An attempt to address these concerns is being led by several institutes including the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute. With the exception of results reporting (which has an infrastructure for standard reports, albeit with several competing lexicons), medical imaging has been largely standardized by the efforts of DICOM, HL7, and IHE. What are not well developed in this area are the tools required for multi-site imaging collaboration and data mining. The goal of this paper is to identify existing clinical interoperability methods that can be used to harmonize the research and clinical worlds, and identify gaps where they exist. To do so, we will detail the approaches of a specific multi-site trial, point out the current deficiencies and workarounds developed in that trial, and finally point to work that seeks to address multi-site imaging challenges.

Key words

Clinical information systems clinical trial controlled vocabulary 


  1. 1.
    Langer S: Radiology speech recognition: workflow, integration, and productivity issues. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 31(3):95–104, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Langer SG, Stewart BK: Computer security: a primer. J Digit Imaging 12(3):114–131, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown MS, Sumit SK, Pais RC, Lee YZ, McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG, Cardenas AF, Aberle DR: Database Design and Implementation for Quantitative Image Analysis Research. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 9(1):99–108, 2005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blois MS, Shortliffe EH: The computer meets medicine: Emergence of a discipline. In: Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE Eds. Medical informatics: computer applications in health care. Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990, p 20Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubin DL: Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging 21(4):355–362, 2008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langlotz CP, Caldwell SA: The completeness of existing lexicons for representing radiology report information. J Digit Imaging 15(Suppl 1):201–205, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hammond WE: HL7—more than a communications standard. Stud Health Technol Inform 96:266–271, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bidgood Jr, WD, Horii SC: Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM Standard. Radiographics 12(2):345–355, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Channin DS: M:I-2 and IHE: integrating the health care enterprise, year 2. Radiographics 20(5):1261–1262, 2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Channin DS, Parisot C, Wanchoo V, Leontiev A, Siegel EL: Integrating the health care enterprise, a primer: part 3, what does IHE do for me?”. Radiographics 21(5):1351–1358, 2001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carr CD: IHE: a model for driving adoption of standards. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27(2–3):137–146, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kakazu KK: The Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG): pioneering an expansive network of information and tools for collaborative cancer research. Hawaii Med J 63(9):273–275, 2004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu BJ, Zhou MZ: Utilizing data grid architecture for the backup and recovering of clinical image data. Comput Med Imaging Graph 29(2–3):95–102, 2005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin K, Daemer G et al (2006) caBIG security technology evaluation white paper. an NCI caBIG Architecture Workspace ProjectGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    TI 2005-04-22 TCE Rev. 1.1. The IHE Teaching File and Clinical Trial Export Draft, copyright ACC/HIMMS/RSNA.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clunie DA: DICOM structured reporting and cancer clinical trials results. Cancer Inform 4:33–56, 2007PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siegel E, Channin D, Perry J, Carr C, Reiner B: Medical image resource center: an update on the RSNA's medical image resource center. J Digit Imaging 15(1):2–4, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siegel E, Reiner B: The radiological society of North America's medical image resource center: an update. Digit Imaging 14(2 Suppl 1):77–79, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    MIRC Site. Last viewed September 2009.

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mayo Clinic RadiologyRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations