Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 581–591 | Cite as

Novel Computer-Aided Diagnosis Algorithms on Ultrasound Image: Effects on Solid Breast Masses Discrimination

  • Ying Wang
  • Hong Wang
  • Yanhui Guo
  • Chunping Ning
  • Bo Liu
  • H. D. Cheng
  • Jiawei TianEmail author


The objective of this study is to retrospectively investigate whether using the newly developed algorithms would improve radiologists’ accuracy for discriminating malignant masses from benign ones on ultrasonographic (US) images. Five radiologists blinded to the histological results and clinical history independently interpreted 226 cases according to the sonographic lexicon of the fourth edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System and assigned a final assessment category to indicate the probability of malignancy. For each case, each radiologist provided three diagnoses: first with the original images, subsequently with the assistant of the resulting images processed by the proposed CAD algorithms which are called as processed images, and another using the processed images only. Observers’ malignancy rating data were analyzed with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. For reading only with the processed images, areas under the ROC curve (A z) of each reader (0.863, 0.867, 0.859, 0.868, 0.878) were better than that with the original images (0.772, 0.807, 0.796, 0.828, 0.846), difference of the average A z between the twice reading was significant (p < 0.001). Compared with the results single used processed images, A z of utilizing the combined images were increased (0.866, 0.885, 0.872, 0.894, 0.903), but the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.081). The proposed CAD method has potential to be a good aid to radiologists in distinguishing malignant breast solid masses from benign ones.

Key words

Computer-aided diagnosis ultrasound breast cancer BI-RADS 



Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) is greatly appreciated; grant numbers: 30670546 and 60873142.


  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2008. Cancer J Clin 58:71–96, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smigal C, Jemal A, Ward E, Cokkinides V, Smith R, Howe HL, Thun M: Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56:168–183, 2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rajkumar SV, Hartmann LC: Screening mammography in women aged 40–49 years. Medicine 78:410–416, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    American College of Radiology: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), Ultrasound, 4th edition. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2003 Available at: Accessed September 8, 2004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA: BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. Am J Roentgenol 184:1260–1265, 2005Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costantini M, Belli P, Ierardi C, Franceschini G, La Torre G, Bonomo L: Solid breast mass characterisation: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification. Radiol Med 112:877–894, 2007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sehgal CM, Cary TW, Kangas SA, Weinstein SP, Schultz SM, Arger PH, Conant EF: Computer-based margin analysis of breast sonography for differentiating malignant and benign masses. J Ultrasound Med 23:1201–1209, 2004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shen W, Chang R, Moon W, Chou Y, Huang C: Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features. Acad Radiol 14:928–939, 2007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen CM, Chou YH, Han KC, Hung GS, Tiu CM, Chiou HJ, Chiou SY: Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks. Radiology 226:504–514, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang YL, Chen DR, Jiang YR, Kuo SJ, Wu HK, Moon WK: Computer-aided diagnosis using morphological features for classifying breast lesions on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:565–572, 2008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sahiner B, Chan HP, Roubidoux MA, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA, Paramagul C, Bailey J, Nees AV, Blane C: Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 242:716–724, 2007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen DR, Chang RF, Chen WM, Moon WK: Computer-aided diagnosis for 3-dimensional breast ultrasonography. Arch Surg 138:296–302, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jackson VP: The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 177:305–311, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pal SK, Majumder DKD: Fuzzy Mathematical Approach to Pattern Recognition, New York: Wiley, 1986Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu CM, Chen YC, Hsieh KS: Texture features for classification of ultrasonic liver images. IEEE Trans Med Imag 11:141–152, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laws KI: Texture Energy Measures. DARPA Image Understanding Workshop. Los Angeles, CA. 1979, pp 47–51Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo Y, Cheng H-D, Huang J, Tian JW, Zhao W, Sun L, Su Y: Breast Ultrasound images enhancement using fuzzy logic. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:237–247, 2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wagner RF, Smith SW, Sandrik JM, Lopez H: Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrason 30:156–163, 1983Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo YH, Cheng HD, Tian JW, Zhang YT: A Novel approach to speckle reduction and its application to ultrasound medical images. Ultrasound Med Biol 35:628–640, 2009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cheng HD, Li JG: Fuzzy homogeneity and scale space approach to color image segmentation. Pattern Recogn 35:373–393, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chan TF, Vese LA: Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10:266–277, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schoonjans F, Zalata A, Depuydt CE, Comhaire FH: MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 48:257–262, 1995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krupinski EA: Computer-aided detection in clinical environment: benefits and challenges for radiologists. Radiology 231:7–9, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA, Gillan MGC, Boggis CRM, Griffiths PM: Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology 241(1):47–53, 2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berg WA, D’Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, Bassett LW, Beam CA, Lewis RS, Crewson PE: Does training in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology 224:871–880, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ying Wang
    • 1
  • Hong Wang
    • 1
  • Yanhui Guo
    • 2
  • Chunping Ning
    • 1
  • Bo Liu
    • 2
  • H. D. Cheng
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jiawei Tian
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Ultrasound DepartmentThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityHarbin,People’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and TechnologyHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUtah State UniversityLogan,USA

Personalised recommendations