Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 309–318 | Cite as

Spine Localization in X-ray Images Using Interest Point Detection



This study was conducted to evaluate a new method used to calculate vertebra orientation in medical x-ray images. The goal of this work is to develop an x-ray image segmentation approach used to identify the location and the orientation of the cervical vertebrae in medical images. We propose a method for localization of vertebrae by extracting the anterior—left—faces of vertebra contours. This approach is based on automatic corner points of interest detection. For this task, we use the Harris corner detector. The final goal is to determine vertebral motion induced by their movement between two or several positions. The proposed system proceeds in several phases as follows: (a) image acquisition, (b) corner detection, (c) extracting of the corners belonging to vertebra left sides, (d) global estimation of the spine curvature, and (e) anterior face vertebra detection.

Key words

Vertebral mobility analysis corner detection face contour detection Harris detector 


  1. 1.
    Xu X, Lee D, Antani S: Localizing contour points for indexing an x-ray image retrieval system (2003) Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Symposium on Computer-based Medical Systems. New York, NY, 2627 June 2003, pp 169–174Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rico G, Benjelloun M, Libert G: Detection, localization and representation of cervical vertebrae. Proceedings of the Computer Vision Winter Workshop 2001; Bled, Slovenia, February 2001, pp 114–124Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benjelloun M, Tellez H, Mahmoudi S: Vertebra edge detection using polar signature. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2006). Vol. 1, pp 476–479Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pham D, Xu C, Prince J: Current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2:315–337, 2000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D: Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1:321–331, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cootes T, Hill A, Taylor C, Haslam J: The use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images. Image Vis Comput 12:355–366, 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sethian J: Level Set Methods. Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lam B, Yan H: A curve tracing algorithm using level set based affine transform. Pattern Recogn Lett 28(2):181–196, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sclaroff S, Isidoro J: Active blobs: region-based, deformable appearance models. Comput Vis Image Underst 89(2–3):197–225, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cootes T, Taylor C: Statistical models of appearance for computer vision. Internal report, 1999Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Bruijne M, van Ginneken B, Viergever M, Niessen W: Adapting active shape models for 3d segmentation of tubular structures in medical images. In: IPMI, volume 2732 of LNCS, Springer, 2003, pp 136–147Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brejl M, Sonka M: Object localization and border detection criteria design in edgebased image segmentation: automated learning from examples. IEEE Trans Med Imag 19(10):973–985, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howe B, Gururajan A, Sari-Sarraf H, Long R: Hierarchical segmentation of cervical and lumbar vertebrae using a customized generalized hough transform. Proceedings of the IEEE 6th SSIAI, Lake Tahoe, NV. March, 2004, pp 182–186Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tezmol A, Sari-Sarraf H, Mitra S, Long R, Gururajan A: A customized hough transform for robust segmentation of cervical vertebrae from x-ray images. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, 2002Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar VPD, Thomas T: Automatic estimation of orientation and position of spine in digitized x-rays using mathematical morphology. J Digit Imaging 18(3):234–241, 2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Masood A, Sarfraz M: “A novel corner detector approach using sliding rectangles”. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, 2006. Volume 00, March 8, 2006, pp 621–626Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harris C, Stephens M: A Combined Corner and Edge Detector. In: Proceedings of the 4th ALVEY Vision Conference, 1988, pp 147–151Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmid C, Mohr R, Bauckhage C: Evaluation of interest point detectors. Int J Comput Vis 37(2):151–172, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mahmoudi S, Benjelloun M: “Corner points detection for vertebral mobility analysis”. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication(ICSPC 2007). Dubai, UAE, 24–27 November 2007. Volume 01, pp 24–27Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beghdadi A, Negrate AL: Contrast enhancement technique based on local detection of edges. Comput. Vis Graph Image Process 46:162–174, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science Department, Faculty of EngineeringMonsBelgium

Personalised recommendations