Advertisement

Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 338–347 | Cite as

Information Entropy Measure for Evaluation of Image Quality

  • Du-Yih Tsai
  • Yongbum Lee
  • Eri Matsuyama
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a simple and straightforward method for synthetically evaluating digital radiographic images by a single parameter in terms of transmitted information (TI). The features of our proposed method are (1) simplicity of computation, (2) simplicity of experimentation, and (3) combined assessment of image noise and resolution (blur). Two acrylic step wedges with 0–1–2–3–4–5 and 0–2–4–6–8–10 mm in thickness were used as phantoms for experiments. In the present study, three experiments were conducted. First, to investigate the relation between the value of TI and image noise, various radiation doses by changing exposure time were employed. Second, we examined the relation between the value of TI and image blurring by shifting the phantoms away from the center of the X-ray beam area toward the cathode end when imaging was performed. Third, we analyzed the combined effect of deteriorated blur and noise on the images by employing three smoothing filters. Experimental results show that the amount of TI is closely related to both image noise and image blurring. The results demonstrate the usefulness of our method for evaluation of physical image quality in medical imaging.

Key words

Medical images image quality image processing information entropy performance evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Mr. Yoshihiko Watanabe of Niigata University for his assistance in the experiments.

References

  1. 1.
    Dobbins III JT: Effect of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. Med Phys 22:171–181, 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kyprianou IS, Rudin S, Bednarek DR, Hoffmann KR: Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include X-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: Application to a new microangiographic system. Med Phys 32:613–626, 2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shannon CE: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423/623–656, 1948Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shannon CE, Weaver W: The mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uchida S, Tsai DY: Evaluation of radiographic images by entropy: Application to development process. Jpn J Appl Phys 17:2029–2034, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uchida S, Tsai DY: Reliability of the modulation transfer function of radiographic screen-film system measured by the slit method. Jpn J Appl Phys 18:1571–1574, 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Uchida S, Fujita H: Assessment of radiographic granularity by a single number. Jpn J Appl Phys 19:1403–1410, 1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim B, Boes JL, Frey KA, et al: Mutual information for automated unwarping of rate brain autoradiographs. Neuroimage 5:31–40, 1997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Studholme C, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ: An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recog 32:71–86, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayton PM, Brady M, Smith SM, et al: A non-rigid registration algorithm for dynamic breast MR images. Artif Intell 114:125–156, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bruckner T, Lucht R, Brix G: Comparison of rigid and elastic matching of dynamic magnetic resonance mammographic images by mutual information. Med Phys 27:2456–2461, 2000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thurfjll L, Lau YH, Andersson JLR, et al: Improved efficiency for MRI-SPET registration based on mutual information. Eur J Nucl Med 27:847–856, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Skouson MB, Guo Q, Liang ZP: A bound on mutual information for image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imag 20:843–846, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shekhar Rand, Zagrodsky V: Mutual information-based rigid and nonrigid registration of ultrasound volumes. IEEE Trans Med Imag 21:9–22, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Qu G, Zhang D, Yan P: Information measure for performance of image fusion. Electron Lett 38:313–315, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pluim JPW, Maintz JBA, Viergever MZ: Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: A survey. IEEE Trans Med Imag 22:986–1004, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Filev P, Hadjiiski L, Shiner B, et al: Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms. Med Phys 32:515–529, 2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Attneave F: Applications of Information Theory to Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1959Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sprawls P: Physical Principles of Medical Imaging. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing, 1995, pp 273–274Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Russ JC: The Image Processing Handbook, 2nd edition. London: CRC, 1995Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiological Technology, School of Health SciencesNiigata UniversityNiigataJapan
  2. 2.Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health SciencesNiigata UniversityNiigataJapan

Personalised recommendations