Advertisement

Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 50–58 | Cite as

The Radiology Digital Dashboard: Effects on Report Turnaround Time

  • Matthew B. MorganEmail author
  • Barton F. BranstetterIV
  • David M. Lionetti
  • Jeremy S. Richardson
  • Paul J. Chang
Article

Abstract

As radiology departments transition to near-complete digital information management, work flows and their supporting informatics infrastructure are becoming increasingly complex. Digital dashboards can integrate separate computerized information systems and summarize key work flow metrics in real time to facilitate informed decision making. A PACS-integrated digital dashboard function designed to alert radiologists to their unsigned report queue status, coupled with an actionable link to the report signing application, resulted in a 24% reduction in the time between transcription and report finalization. The dashboard was well received by radiologists who reported high usage for signing reports. Further research is needed to identify and evaluate other potentially useful work flow metrics for inclusion in a radiology clinical dashboard.

Key words

Workflow user interface radiology management efficiency software design decision support 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by a 2005 research grant from the Society of Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM).

References

  1. 1.
    Morgan MB, Branstetter BFt, Mates J, Chang PJ: Flying blind: using a digital dashboard to navigate a complex PACS environment. J Digit Imaging 19:69–75, 2006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Langer SG: Impact of tightly coupled PACS/speech recognition on report turnaround time in the radiology department. J Digit Imaging 15 Suppl 1:234–236, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oguz KK, Yousem DM, Deluca T, Herskovits EH, Beauchamp NJ Jr.: Impact of pager notification on report verification times. Acad Radiol 9:954–959, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cavagna E, Berletti R, Schiavon F, Scarsi B, Barbato G: Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department. Radiol Med (Torino) 105:205–214, 2003Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mehta A, Dreyer K, Boland G, Frank M: Do picture archiving and communication systems improve report turnaround times? J Digit Imaging 13:105–107, 2000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Overhage JM, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ: Computer reminders to implement preventive care guidelines for hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 156:1551–1556, 1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    James BC: Making it easy to do it right. N Engl J Med 345:991–993, 2001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew B. Morgan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barton F. BranstetterIV
    • 1
  • David M. Lionetti
    • 1
  • Jeremy S. Richardson
    • 1
  • Paul J. Chang
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Radiology Informatics, Department of RadiologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Enterprise ImagingUniversity of Chicago HospitalsChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations