Optimization of Dose and Image Quality for Computed Radiography and Digital Radiography
- 922 Downloads
- 20 Citations
The surface doses to patients during chest, abdomen and pelvis radiography were measured over a period of 3 years, during which time computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) systems were introduced to replace film–screen systems. For film–screen and CR the surface doses were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters. For DR the surface doses were calculated from the dose–area product (DAP) meter readings. Measurements were made for each type of examination and detector type on 10 average-size patients. Measurements were made immediately after the new systems were introduced, and subsequently as adjustments were made to optimize dose and image quality. Published diagnostic reference levels were used as target values in this optimization. Initially, CR doses were the same as or higher than for film–screen, and the doses were lower for DR compared to film–screen. Subsequent clinical experience with the systems led to changes in the technique used for chest examinations both for CR and for DR. For CR, it was possible to change the algorithm and decrease the dose to one quarter of the initial value with acceptable image quality. For DR, it was decided to reduce noise by increasing the dose by a factor of two. No changes were made to abdomen or pelvic imaging techniques for either CR or DR. The final patient surface doses using CR were similar to published diagnostic reference doses; for DR, all patient doses were less than published reference levels.
Key Words
Computed radiography digital radiography optimization patient doseNotes
Acknowledgments
This study was undertaken jointly by the Department of Radiology of Vancouver General Hospital and the Radiation Protection Services of the Centre for Disease Control of British Columbia. We would like to thank David Morley for the provision and measurement of the TLDs and the radiology staff of Vancouver Hospital who helped in data collection.
References
- 1.United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Ionizing Radiation2000Sources and Effects of Ionizing RadiationUnited NationsNew YorkGoogle Scholar
- 2.International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP):1996Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Annals of the ICRP 26, No. 2Pergamon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
- 3.International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): International action plan for the radiological protection of patients: Report by the Director General. IAEA, Vienna, 2002, GOV/2002/36-GC(46)/12Google Scholar
- 4.European Commission:1997On health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposure. Council Directive 97/43/EuratomOff J Eur Communities L Legis1802227Google Scholar
- 5.European Commission:1999Guidance on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Medical Exposures. Radiation Protection 109Office for Official Publications of the European CommunitiesLuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- 6.Aldrich, JE, Andrews, JW 1981Measurement of x-ray exposures using mailed thermoluminescent dosimetersCan Assoc Radiol J32202205Google Scholar
- 7.National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB):1992National Protocol for Patient Dose Measurements in Diagnostic RadiologyChiltonDidcot, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hart, D, Jones, DG, Wall, BF 1994Estimation of Effective Dose in Diagnostic Radiology from Entrance Surface Dose and Dose-Area Product Measurements. NRPB Report R262ChiltonDidcot, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 9.International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP):19911990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 21, No. 1–3Pergamon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hart, D, Hillier, MC, Wall, BF June 2002Doses to Patients from Medical X-Ray Examinations in the UK 2000 Review. National Radiological Protection Board Publication NRPB-W14ChiltonDidcot, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 11.ICRP: Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. http://www.icrp.org/educational_area.htm, 2001
- 12.International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA):2004Optimization of the Radiological Protection of Patients Undergoing Radiography, Fluoroscopy and Computed Tomography. IAEA-TECDOC-1423IAEAViennaGoogle Scholar
- 13.Gray, JE, Archer, BR, Butler, PF, et al. 2005Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impactRadiology235354358PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Conway, BJ, Butler, PF, Duff, JE, et al. 1984Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinationsMed Phys11827832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Sulieman, OH, Stern, SH, Spelic, DC 1999Patient dosimetry activities in the US: the nationwide evaluation of x-ray trends and tissue dose handbooksAppl Radiat Isotopes247249259Google Scholar