Advertisement

Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 203–208 | Cite as

Department of Defense Picture Archiving and Communication System Acceptance Testing: Results and Identification of Problem Components

  • Scott A. AllisonEmail author
  • Clifford F. Sweet
  • Douglas P. Beall
  • Thomas E. Lewis
  • Thomas Monroe
Article

The PACS implementation process is complicated requiring a tremendous amount of time, resources, and planning. The Department of Defense (DOD) has significant experience in developing and refining PACS acceptance testing (AT) protocols that assure contract compliance, clinical safety, and functionality. The DOD’s AT experience under the initial Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support System contract led to the current Digital Imaging Network–Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (DIN-PACS) contract AT protocol. To identify the most common system and component deficiencies under the current DIN-PACS AT protocol, 14 tri-service sites were evaluated during 1998–2000. Sixteen system deficiency citations with 154 separate types of limitations were noted with problems involving the workstation, interfaces, and the Radiology Information System comprising more than 50% of the citations. Larger PACS deployments were associated with a higher number of deficiencies. The most commonly cited systems deficiencies were among the most expensive components of the PACS.

Key words

PACS acceptance testing workstation clinical use determination monitors HIS RIS DIN-PACS MDIS 

References

  1. 1.
    Samei, E, Seibert, JA, Andriole, K,  et al. 2004AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: general guidelines for purchasing and acceptance testing of PACS equipmentRadiographics24313334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Romlein J, Norton GJ, Lyche DK, et al.: PACS: acceptance test, quality control, warranty, and maintenance continuum. In: Blain GJ, Horii SC (eds). Proc. SPIE: Medical Imaging 1999: PACS Design and Evaluation: Engineering and Clinical Issues. 3662, 1999, pp 111–119Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis, TE, Horton, MC, Kinsey, TV,  et al. 1999Acceptance testing of integrated picture archiving and communications systemsJ Digit Imaging12163165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richardson, NE, Thomas, JA, Lyche, DK,  et al. 1999The philosophy of benchmark testing a standards-based picture archiving and communications systemJ Digit Imaging128793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shelton, PD, Lyche, DK, Norton, GS,  et al. 1999Benchmark testing the digital imaging network picture archiving and communication system proposal of the Department of DefenseJ Digit Imaging129498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chacko AK, Wider R, Romlen J, et al.: PACS: implementation in the US Department of Defense. In: Blain GJ, Siegel EL (eds). Proc. SPIE: Medical Imaging 2000: PACS Design and Evaluation: Engineering and Clinical Issues. 3980, 2000, pp 139–146Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wechter AR, Johnson, BS, Richardson N: DIN-PACS An Introduction. Defense Supply Center Philadelphia (DSCP), regarding contracts SP0200-98-D-8701 and SP0200-98-D-8702. https://dmmonline.dscp.dla.mil/equip/documents/dinpacs.doc
  8. 8.

Copyright information

© SCAR (Society for Computer Applications in Radiology) 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott A. Allison
    • 1
    Email author
  • Clifford F. Sweet
    • 1
  • Douglas P. Beall
    • 1
  • Thomas E. Lewis
    • 1
  • Thomas Monroe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiological SciencesUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterOklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations