Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 209–218 | Cite as

Solution for Nonuniformities and Spatial Noise in Medical LCD Displays by Using Pixel-Based Correction

  • Tom Kimpe
  • Albert Xthona
  • Paul Matthijs
  • Lode De Paepe
Article

Liquid crystal displays (LCD) are rapidly replacing cathode ray tube displays (CRT) for medical imaging. LCD technology has improved significantly in the last few years and has important advantages over CRT. However, there are still some aspects of LCD that raise questions as to the usefulness of liquid crystal displays for very subtle clinical diagnosis such as mammography. One drawback of modern LCD displays is the existence of spatial noise expressed as measurable stationary differences in the behavior of individual pixels. This type of noise can be described as a random stationary image superposed on top of the medical image being displayed. It is obvious that this noise image can make subtle structures invisible or add nonexistent patterns to the medical image. In the first case, subtle abnormalities in the medical image could remain undetected, whereas in the second case, it could result into a false positive. This paper describes a method to characterize the spatial noise present in high-resolution medical displays and a technique to solve the problem. A medical display with built-in compensation for the spatial noise at pixel level was developed and improved image quality is demonstrated.

Key words

LCD medical uniformity noise pixel compensation mammography 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the “Flemish Institute for the Improvement of Scientific-Technological Research in the Industry (IWT)” for their financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Roehrig H, Krupinski EA, Chawla AS, Fan JH, Gandhi K: Spatial noise and threshold contrasts in LCD displays. SPIE Medical Imaging (San Diego, CA), February 2003, pp. 15–20Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fan J, Dallas WJ, Roehrig H, Gandhi K, Krupinski E: Spatial noise of high-resolution liquid-crystal displays for medical imaging: quantitative analysis, estimation and compensation. In: SPIE Medical Imaging Conference Workshop, San Diego, CA, pp. 14–19, February 2004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Badano, A, Hipper, SJ, Jennings, RJ 2002Luminance effect on display resolution and noiseProc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng4681305313Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krupinski, E, Roehrig, H 2002Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displaysAcad Radiol9638645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Engen R, Young K, Bosmans H, Thijssen M, Visser R, Oostveen L, Geertse T, Bijkerk R, Heid P: Addendum on digital mammography to chapter three of the European Protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening, November 2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roehrig H, Krupinski EA, Fan J, Chawla A, Gandhi K: Physical and psychophysical evaluation of LCD noise. 18th International Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Conference, Chicago, IL, pp. 23–26, June 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SCAR (Society for Computer Applications in Radiology) 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Kimpe
    • 1
  • Albert Xthona
    • 1
  • Paul Matthijs
    • 1
  • Lode De Paepe
    • 1
  1. 1.BARCO-Medical Imaging SystemsCourtraiBelgium

Personalised recommendations