, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 222–227 | Cite as

Alternative Data Governance Models: Moving Beyond One-Size-Fits-All Solutions

  • Bruno Carballa SmichowskiEmail author


Data governance is currently dominated by the hegemonicmodel in which the data collector retains exclusive controlover the data it collects. The overreach of this model has created problems in various fields that call for alternativedata governance models


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Hofheinz, D. Osimo: Making Europe a data economy: a new framework for free movement of data in the digital age, in: Lisbon Council Policy Brief, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.E. Cohen: Law for the platform economy, U.C. Davis L. Rev. 133–2014, 2017Google Scholar
  3. 2a.
    N. Duch-Brown, B. Martens, F. Mueller-Langer: The economics of ownership, access and trade in digital data, JRC Digital Economy Paper 2017-01, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    M. Mazzucato: Let's make private data into a public good, MIT Technology Review website, 27 June 2018, available at Google Scholar
  5. 3a.
    I. Arrieta-Ibarra, L. Goff, D. Jiménez-Hernández, J. Lanier, E.G. Weyl: Should We Treat Data as Labor? Moving beyond “Free”, aea Papers and Proceedings, No. 108m, 2018, pp. 38–42Google Scholar
  6. 3b.
    G. Koenig: Ne donnons plus nos données, Le Nouveau Magazine Littéraire, Vol. 4, 2018, p. 49.Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    B. Coriat: Le retour des communs: & la crise de l'idéologie propriétaire, Éditions Les Liens qui libèrent, 2015Google Scholar
  8. 4a.
    P. Abecassis, J.-F. Alesandrini, B. Coriat, N. Coutinet, S. Leyronas: DNDi, a Distinctive Illustration of Commons in the Area of Public Health, 2019Google Scholar
  9. 4b.
    F. Orsi, J. Rochfeld, M. Cornu-Volatron: Dictionnaire des biens communs, 2017, Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  10. 5.
    A. Blasimme, E. Vayena, E. Hafen: Democratizing Health Research Through Data Cooperatives, in: Philosophy & Technology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2018, pp. 473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 5a.
    E. Hafen, D. Kossmann, A. Brand: Health data cooperatives - citizen empowerment, in: Methods of Information in Medicine, Vol. 53, No. 02, 2014, pp. 82–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 6.
    J. Crémer, Y.-A. Montjoye, H. Schweitzer: Competition policy for the digital era, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission, 2019.Google Scholar
  13. 7.
    L. Maurel, L. Aufrère: Pour une protection sociale des données personnelles, SI Lex, 5 February 2018, available at Scholar
  14. 8.
    D. Cardon, A. Casilli: Qu'est-ce que le digital labor?, Bry-sur-Marne, INA, coll. “Etudes et controverses”, 2015Google Scholar
  15. 8a.
    C. Fuchs: Digital Labor, The Routledge Companion to Labor and Media, p. 51, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 9.
    For example, it is the network of relations between individuals' digital footprints, and not each individual's data, which is valuable to a platform like Facebook.Google Scholar
  17. 10.
    Let us make clear that the term ‘social welfare’ is used in a wide manner. It is understood as a macro-system of social, legal and political relations between the domestic economic and political spheres that protect individuals and their families to live in dignity against life hazards and society against disintegration forces threatening it, see N. Alix, L. Aufrère, J.-C. Barbier, J.-C. Boual, F. Hermet, S. De Heusch, H. Vandenbilcke: La protection sociale en France: une macro institution en réforme permanente, Perspectives du point de vue de l'ESS et des commun. Groupe de recherche collaborative protection sociale, ESS et Communs au sein de la Coop des Communs, 2018.Google Scholar
  18. 11.
    I. Arrieta-Ibarra et al., op. cit.Google Scholar
  19. 12.
    K. Mehrotra, A. White: Facebook Must Face Lawsuit Over 29 Million-User Data Breach, Bloomberg, available at
  20. 13.
    L. Belot: De la Smart City au territoire d'intelligence (s)-L'avenir de la Smart City, rapport au Premier ministre sur l'avenir des smart cities, 2017.Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    J. Crémer et al., op. cit.Google Scholar
  22. 15.
    B. Carballa Smichowski: Determinants of coopetition through data sharing in MaaS, in: Management & Data Science, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2018.Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    J. Crémer et al., op. cit.Google Scholar
  24. 17.
    The following have already envisioned the possibility of applying the essential facility doctrine to data: Z. Abrahamson: Essential data, in: Yale Law Journal, Vol. 124, No. 3, 2014, p. 867; andGoogle Scholar
  25. 17a.
    I. Graef: Data as essential facility: competition and innovation on online platforms, 2016.Google Scholar
  26. 18.
    B. Carballa Smichowski: The value of data: an analysis of closed-urban-data-based and open-data-based business models, Working paper No. 01/2018 of the Cities and Digital Technologies Chair, Urban School, Sciences Po, 2018Google Scholar
  27. 18a.
    S. Chignard, L.-D. Benyayer: Datanomics. Les nouveaux business models des données, FYP editions, 2015.Google Scholar
  28. 19.
    For a case-study-based analysis of data governance in integrated digital care records see Future Care Capital: Intelligent sharing: unleashing the potential of health and care data in the UK to transform outcomes, 2017.Google Scholar
  29. 20.
    P.-A. Mangolte: La guerre des brevets d'Edison aux frères Wright: Une comparaison franco-américaine, Paris 2014, Éditions l'Harmattan.Google Scholar
  30. 21.
    B. Carballa Smichowski: Determinants of coopetition through data sharing in MaaS, op. cit.Google Scholar
  31. 22.
    C. Arnaut, M. Pont, E. Scaria, A. Berghmans, S. Leconte: Study on data sharing between companies in Europe, DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, 2018, European Commission.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ZBW and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ChronosParisFrance

Personalised recommendations