Advertisement

Mycoscience

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 241–247 | Cite as

Taxonomy, phylogeny, and distribution of Puccinia graminis, the black stem rust: new insights based on rDNA sequence data

  • Mehrdad Abbasi
  • Stephen B. Goodwin
  • Markus SchollerEmail author
FULL PAPER

Abstract

Puccinia graminis (Uredinales) is an economically important and common host-alternating rust species on Berberidaceae/Poaceae (subfamilies Pooideae and Panicoideae) that has been spread globally by human activities from an unknown center of origin. To evaluate the taxonomic implications, phylogenetic relationships, and distribution/spread of this complex species, we sequenced and cladistically analyzed the ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 regions from herbarium specimens on various host plants from Iran (17), Europe (1), and North America (4). The ITS region plus the 5.8S gene ranged from 686 to 701 bp, including the flanking partial sequences of the 18S and 28S rDNA. Our phylogenetic analysis included 54 bp of the 18S sequence, the entire ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2, and 58 bp of the 28S sequence. A second analysis used only the last 42 bp of ITS1, and all the 5.8S and ITS2, to incorporate data from additional sequences downloaded from GenBank. In addition to variation in sequence length, there was variation in sequence content. The analysis does not support classical morphology-based taxonomic concepts of the P. graminis complex. Also, host range, host taxonomy, and geographic origin provide minor information on taxonomic relationships. Puccinia graminis is most probably monophyletic. Coevolutionary aspects can hardly be discussed because of lack of sequence data from alternate host specimens. The occurrence of unrelated fungal taxa on the same host species suggests that, besides coevolution with the host, host jumps and hybridization may have played an important role in the evolution of P. graminis. From rDNA data we conclude that the pathogen was introduced to North America at least twice independently. For a new taxonomic concept, we think the complex has to be split into at least two species. New morphological features and further features other than sequence data, however, must be checked for taxonomic value first and, if necessary, be considered.

Key words

Coevolution Collective species Species concept Taxonomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbasi, M, Hedjaroude, GA, Ershad, D, Termeh, F 2002On the taxonomy of Puccinia graminis Pers. and some remarks on the ecology of the rust in IranIran J Plant Pathol38942Google Scholar
  2. Anikster, Y, Wahl, I 1979Coevolution of the rust fungi on Gramineae and Liliaceae and their hostsAnnu Rev Phytopathol17367403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burdon, JJ, Marshall, DR 1981Isozyme variation between species and formae speciales of the genus PucciniaCan J Bot5926282634Google Scholar
  4. Cummins, GB 1971The rust fungi of cereals, grasses and bamboosSpringerBerlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Gäumann, E 1959Die Rostpilze Mitteleuropas mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der SchweizBeitr Kryptogamenflora Schweiz1211407Google Scholar
  6. Goodwin, SB, Zismann, VL 2001Phylogenetic analyses of the ITS region of ribosomal DNA reveal that Septoria passerinii from barley is closely related to the wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicolaMycologia93934946Google Scholar
  7. Goodwin, SB, Dunkle, LD, Zismann, VL 2001Phylogenetic analysis of Cercospora and Mycosphaerella based on the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNAPhytopathology91648658Google Scholar
  8. Green, GJ 1971Hybridization between Puccinia graminis tritici and Puccinia graminis secalis and its evolutionary implicationsCan J Bot4920892095Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, T 1949Intervarietal crosses in Puccinia graminisCan J Res C274565Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, T, Newton, M, Brown, AM 1932Hybridization of Puccinia graminis tritici with Puccinia graminis secalis and Puccinia graminis agrostidisSci Agric13141153Google Scholar
  11. Kimura, M 1980A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequencesJ Mol Evol16111120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Leppik, EE 1961Some viewpoints on the phylogeny of rust fungi. IV. Stem rust genealogyMycologia53378405Google Scholar
  13. Leppik, EE 1970Gene centers of plants as sources of disease resistanceAnnu Rev Phytopathol8323344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McAlpine D (1906) The rusts of Australia. Their structure, nature and classification. Robert S. Brain, p 349Google Scholar
  15. Perrière, G, Gouy, M 1996WWW-Query: an online retrieval system for biological sequence banksBiochimie (Paris)78364369Google Scholar
  16. Saitou, N, Nei, M 1987The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic treesMol Biol Evol4406425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Savile, DBO, Urban, Z 1982Evolution and ecology of Puccinia graminisPreslia5497104Google Scholar
  18. Scholler, M 1998Obligate phytoparasitic fungi as plant taxonomists: an overview under special consideration of the rust fungus P. lagenophoraeJ Plant Dis Protect105239245Google Scholar
  19. Swertz, CA 1994Morphology of germlings of urediniospores and its value for the identification and classification of grass rust fungiStud Mycol361152Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, J, Swann, E 1994Dried samples: soft tissues, DNA from herbarium specimensHerrmann, BHummel, S eds. Ancient DNASpringerNew York166181Google Scholar
  21. Thompson, JD, Gibson, TJ, Plewniak, F, Jeanmougin, F, Higgins, DG 1997The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis toolsNucl Acids Res2548764882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Urban, Z 1967The taxonomy of some European graminicolous rustsČeská Mykol211216Google Scholar
  23. Urban, Z, Markova, J 1983On the taxonomy and ecology of Puccinia graminisCereal Rusts Bull111216Google Scholar
  24. Urban, Z, Markova, J 1984Ecology and evolution of Puccinia graminis PersCeska Mykol386595Google Scholar
  25. Vavilov, NI 1992Origin and geography of cultivated plantsUniversity PressCambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  26. White, TJ, Bruns, T, Lee, S, Taylor, J 1990Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal DNA for phylogeneticsInnis, MAGelfand, DHSninsky, JJWhite, TJ eds. PCR protocols: a guide to the methods and applicationsAcademicSan DiegoGoogle Scholar
  27. Zambino, PJ, Szabo, LJ 1993Phylogenetic relationships of selected cereal and grass rusts based on rDNA sequence analysisMycologia85401414Google Scholar
  28. Zwetko, P, Pfeifhofer, HW 1991Carotinuntersuchungen an Rostpilzsporen. Bedeutung für die Physiologie und TaxonomieNova Hedwegia52251266Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Mycological Society of Japan and Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehrdad Abbasi
    • 1
  • Stephen B. Goodwin
    • 2
  • Markus Scholler
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Plant Pests and Diseases Research InstituteTehranIran
  2. 2.Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service; Department of Botany and Plant PathologyPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.Staatliches Museum für NaturkundeAbteilung BotanikKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations