Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the effects of different beverages with daily consumption habits on the wear of restorative materials

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the cumulative effects of fruit juices and/or alcoholic beverages on wear track area of the restorative materials by simulating the oral environment in vitro. A microhybrid, a sub-microhybrid, a nanofill resin composite, and a giomer material were used. A daily exposure habits model was created to simulate consumption frequency of acidic and/or alcoholic beverages. Two-body wear tests were carried out using a reciprocating wear tester. ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD tests were used for statistical analyses (p < 0.05). When considering experimental groups related to daily exposure habits, statistical difference was found between restorative materials in terms of wear track area (p < 0.01). Joint effect of rmaterial and exposure on wear track area was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Giomer was found to be more affected by acidic and alcoholic beverages. Microhybrid resin composites showed less wear than the other restorative materials. Cumulative effects of alcoholic beverages and fruit juice on wear track area of materials could be related to material’s composition and frequency of consumption of acid or ethanol-containing beverages. Daily cumulative effect of acidic and alcoholic beverages was found to be stronger than only acidic fruit juice consumption in terms of wear track area. The plasticizing effect and the concentration of ethanol in the alcoholic beverages provided the basis for the increased wear track area on the restorative materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarrett DC, Coletti DP, Peluso AR. The effects of alcholic beverages on composite wear. Dent Mater. 2000;16:62–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mc Kinney JE, Wu W. Chemical softening and wear of dental composites. J Dent. 2006;34:214–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yusuf F, Sriekha A, Hegde J, Karale R, Bashetty K, Adiga S. Effect of alcholic and non-alcholic beverages on the wear and fracture toughness of teeth and resin composite materials: In vitro study. J Res Dent. 2013;1:11–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ayatollahi MR, Yahya MY, Karimzadeh A, Nikkhooyifar M, Ayob A. Effects of temperature change and beverage on mechanical and tribiological properties of dental restorative composites. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;54:69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bowen RL. Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963;66:57–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bayne SC. Dental biomaterials: where are we and where are we going? J Dent Educ. 2005;69:571–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:1382–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beun S, Glorieux J, Devaux J, Vreven G, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater. 2007;23:51–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27:29–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin J, Sun M, Zheng Z, Shinya A, Han J, Lin H, Zheng G, Shinya A. Effects of rotating fatigue on the mechanical properties of microhybrid and nanofiller-containing composites. Dent Mater J. 2013;32:476–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fan HY, Gan XQ, Liu Y, Zhu ZL, Yu HY. The nanomechanical and tribological properties of restorative dental composites after exposure in different types of media. J Nanomat. 2014;1–9.

  12. Akova T, Ozkomur A, Uysal H. Effect of food-simulating liquids on the mechanical properties of provisional restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2006;22:1130–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Badra VV, Faraoni JJ, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of composite resins. Oper Dent. 2005;30:213–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao L, Zhao X, Gong X, Zhao S. An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of composite resins. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6:423–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sevimay M, Yucel MT, Tak O. Influence of food simulating solutions on the hardness of composite resins. J Compos Mater. 2008;42:69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozel S. Surface hardness of different restorative materials after long-term immersion in sports and energy drinks. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(5):729–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozel S. Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: Influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short-term period. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(2):124–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gil MI, Tomas-Barberan FA, Hess-Pierce B, Holcroft DM, Kader AA. Antioxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its relationship with phenolic composition and processing. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48:4581–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Y, Guo C, Yang J, Wei J, Xu J, Cheng S. Evaluation of antioxidant properties of pomegranate peel extract in comparison with pomegranate pulp extract. Food Chem. 2006;96:254–60.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zarfeshany A, Asgary S, Javanmard SH. Potent health effects of pomegranate. Adv Biomed Res. 2014;3:100.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Siriporananon C, Ornprasert N, Mettasitthikorn W, Likhitpreeda S, Waewsanga S. The effect of different beverages on surface hardness of nanohybrid resin composite and giomer. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:261–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. de Moraes Porto IC, das Neves LE de Souza CK, Parolia A, Barbosa dos Santos N. A comparative effecet of mouthwashes with different alcohol concentrations on surface hardness, sorption and solubility of composite resins. OHDM. 2014;13:502–6.

  23. Al-Samadani KH. Effect of energy drinks on the surface texture of nanofilled composite resin. JCDP. 2013;14:830–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. https://www.tribotechnic.com/en/products/tribometers/18-english-categories/products

  25. Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, Lloyd CH. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement Report of a workshop. J Dent. 1996;24(1–2):141–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu X, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:756–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yilmaz EC, Sadeler R. Investigation of two- and three-body wear resistance on flowable bulk-fill and resin-based composites. Mech Compos Mater. 2018;54(3):395–402.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Iwasaki N, Takahashi H, Koottathape N, Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Sasaki K. Texture of composite resins exposed to two- and three-body wear in vitro. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15(2):232–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. de Souza JA, Dolavale LC, de Souza Camargo SA. Wear mechanisms of dental composite restorative materials by two different in-vitro methods. Mat Res. 2013;16(2):333–40.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dziedzic K, Zubrzycka-Wróbel J, Józwik J, Barszcz M, Siwak P, Chałas R. Research on tribological properties of dental composite materials. ASTRJ. 2016;10(32):144–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Takarabe M. An experimental study on sliding-induced abrasion of natural teeth and materials used for crowns. Shikwa Gakuho. 1982;82:949–1004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hara M, Takuma Y, Sato T, Koyama T, Yoshinari M. Wear performance of bovine tooth enamel against translucent tetragonal zirconia polycrystals after different surface treatments. Dent Mater J. 2014;33:811–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. https://www.cnfusers.cornell.edu/sites/default/files/EquipmentResources/Veeco%20Dektak%206M%20protocol%20102011.pdf

  34. Han JM, Lin H, Zheng G, Shinya A, Gomi H, Shinya A, Lin J. Effect of nanofiller on wear resistance and surface roughness of resin composites. Chin J Dent Res. 2012;15:41–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maganur PC, Prabhakar AR, Satish V, Namineni S, Kurtukoki A. Erosive effect of soft drink and fresh fruit juice on restorative materials. World J Dent. 2013;4:32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B. Degradability of nanocomposites after cyclic immersion in red and White wines. J Orofac Sci. 2016;8:40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mayworm CD, Camargo SS Jr, Bastian FL. Influence of artificial saliva on abrasive wear and microhardness of dental composites filled with nanoparticles. J Dent. 2008;36(9):703–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hirano S, May KB, Wagner WC, Hacker CH. In vitro wear of resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(2):152–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bianchi EC, da Silva EJ, Monici RD, Xavier AP, de Freitas CA, Bianchi ARR. Development of a new standard procedure for the evaluation of composite abrasive wear. Mater Res. 2001;4(4):273–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005;33:389–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schulze KA, Marshall SJ, Gansky SA, Marshall GW. Color stability and hardness in dental composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater. 2003;19:612–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee SY, Huang HM, Lin CY, Shih YH. Leached components from dental composites in oral simulating fluids and the resultant composite strengths. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:575–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of selected components on cross-link density in polymer structures. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;108:282–5.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sunico MC, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations. Oper Dent. 2005;30(3):282–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1702–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Palmer G, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. The effect of curing regime on the release of hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) from resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent. 1999;27:303–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Harhash AY, El Sayad II, Zaghloul AGS. A comparative in vitro study on fluoride release and water sorption of different flowable esthetic restorative materials. Eur J Dent. 2017;29:174–9.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC, Wistrom DW, Swift EJ Jr. Short-term fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater. 1995;11:96–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Asmussen E. Softening of BISGMA-based polymers by ethanol and by organic and by organic acids of plaque. Eur J Oral Sci. 1984;92:257–61.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Venz S, Dickens B. NIR-spectroscopic investigation of water sorption characteristics of dental resin and composites. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:1231–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mitra S. Nanotechnology-more than tiny particles. Espertise Magazine. 2005;7 3M ESPE

  52. Ruddle DE, Maloney MM, Thompson IY. Effect of novel filler particles on the mechanical and wear properties of dental composites. Dent Mater. 2002;18(1):72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pieniak D, Walczak A, Niewczas AM. comparative study of wear resistance of the composite with microhybrid structure and nanocomposite. Acta Mechanica et Automatica. 2016;10(4):306–9.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ogliari FA, Ely C, Zanchi CH, Fortes CB, Samuel SM, Demarco FF, Petzhold CL, Piva E. Influence of chain extender length of aromatic dimethacrylates on polymer network development. Dent Mater. 2008;24:165–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lemon MT, Jones MS, Stansbury JW. Hydrogen bonding interactions in methacrylate monomers and polymers. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;83A:734–46.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sagsoz O, Ozakar Ilday N, Polat Sagsoz N, Bayindir YZ, Alsaran A. Investigation of hardness and wear behavior of dental composite resins. Int J Compos Mater. 2014;4(4):179–84.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Santos C, Clarke RL, Braden M, Guitian F, Davy KW. Water absorption characteristics of dental composites incorporating hydroxyapatite filler. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1897–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. da Silva EM, Almeida GS, Poskus LT, Guimaraes JG. Relationship between the degree of conversion, solubility and salivary sorption of a hybrid and a nanofilled resin composite. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16:161–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Roulet J-F. Degradation of dental polymers. Basel: Karger; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  60. ISO (2001) Dental materials—guidance on testing of wear. Part 2: wear by two-and/or three body contact. Technical specification 14569–72.

  61. Abu-Bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Changes in the mechanical properties and surface texture of compomer immersed in various media. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:444–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Behrendt A, Oerste V, Wetzel WE. Fluoride concentration and pH of iced teas products. Caries Res. 2002;36:405–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 2006;22:211–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rahim TN, Dasmawati Mohamad D, Md Akil H, Ab RI. Water sorption characteristics of restorative dentalcomposites immersed in acidic drinks. Dent Mater. 2012;28:63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wu W, Pestaner J, Bowen RL. Composite resin chemistry: the effects of solvents on surface hardness. In: Taylor DF, editors. Posterior composites. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Posterior composite resins. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: 1982. pp. 7–20.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to owe a debt of gratitude to Prof. Dr. Murat Baydogan from Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, for his scientific contribution to the paper. The authors would like to thank Ebru Osmanoglu for the statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Dental Medicine, Restorative Dentistry Department, Bahcesehir University, Sahrayicedid Mahallesi, Batman sokak. No:66-68, Yenisahra, Kadikoy, Istanbul, Turkey

    Magrur Kazak

  2. Faculty of Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Murat Tiryaki & Yasemin Benderli Gokce

  3. Faculty of Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry Department, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Elif Turkes Basaran

Authors
  1. Magrur Kazak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Murat Tiryaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elif Turkes Basaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yasemin Benderli Gokce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magrur Kazak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazak, M., Tiryaki, M., Turkes Basaran, E. et al. Evaluating the effects of different beverages with daily consumption habits on the wear of restorative materials. Odontology 108, 636–645 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00498-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00498-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation