Surface roughness and wear behavior of occlusal splint materials made of contemporary and high-performance polymers
- 138 Downloads
With the development of a digital technology of computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and new age materials, the use of new types of occlusal splint is to consider. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra) and wear behavior of different CAD/CAM materials against enamel antagonist through a simulated chewing test. A total of 75 specimens made from ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polycarbonate (PC), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and polyethyleneterephthalate (PETG) as a control were polished to evaluate the Ra before loading by optical profilometry and further analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Specimens of each group were subjected to thermomechanical fatigue loading in a chewing simulator (60000 cycles at 49 N with 5–55 °C thermocycling). The wear volume loss and change in Ra of each specimen after the simulated chewing were analyzed. One-way ANOVA, paired samples t test, and Pearson correlation analysis were performed for statistical analyzes. The result showed that the volume loss and Ra varied among the materials tested. EVA exhibited the greatest amount of Ra and volume loss (p < 0.001), while PEEK had the lowest values for both (p < 0.001). In terms of volume loss, there was no significant difference between PC and PMMA (p > 0.05). SEM investigations revealed different wear behaviors, especially in EVA. As PEEK showed significantly more favorable results, PEEK splints should be considered as a new therapeutic option for occlusal splint.
KeywordsOcclusal splint PEEK Wear Surface roughness EVA
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. Prevalence of TMJD and its signs and symptoms. 2018. https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/research/data-statistics/facial-pain/prevalence. Accessed 13 Mar 2019
- 5.Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc.; 2008.Google Scholar
- 10.Algabri RS, Alqutaibi AY, Abo-Alrejal H, Al Adashi O, Abdulrahman F, Amr Elkhadem A, et al. Effect of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture versus conventional occlusal splints on the management of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Dent Med J Adv Res. 2017;3:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Jakstat HA, Ahlers MO. Schienentherapie. In: Ahlers MO, Jakstat HA, editors. Klinische Funktionsanalyse 4. Erweiterte und aktualisierte. Hamburg: DentaConcept; 2011. p. 631–44.Google Scholar
- 22.Dunn DB, Lewis MB. CAD/CAM occlusal splints: a new paradigm. Aust Dent Pract. 2011;22:130–4.Google Scholar
- 26.Edelhoff D, Schweiger J. CAD/CAM tooth-colored splint for the esthetic and functional evaluation of a new vertical dimension of occlusion. Quintessence Dent Tech Yearb. 2014;37:1610–23.Google Scholar
- 27.Hogan J. DentaBite: a precision engineering solution to a traditional problem. Aust Dent Pract. 2011;8:164–8.Google Scholar
- 34.https://medical.vestakeep.com/sites/lists/re/documentshp/vestakeep%20dental.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019
- 36.ISO, 2009. Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: profile method—terms, definitions and surface texture parameters (ISO 4287:1997). International Organization for Standardization. (https://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/ ISOstore/store.htm). Accessed 26 Mar 2019.
- 52.Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hämmerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J. 2012;31:377–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 61.Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implants. 1996;11:169–78.Google Scholar