Advertisement

Odontology

pp 1–9 | Cite as

Dual Rinse® HEDP increases the surface tension of NaOCl but may increase its dentin disinfection efficacy

  • Luciano Giardino
  • Massimo Del FabbroEmail author
  • Marco Morra
  • Thais Pereira
  • Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade
  • Paolo Savadori
  • Luigi Generali
Original Article
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface tension and the antimicrobial activity in infected dentin of a NaOCl solution combined with an etidronate powder (Dual Rinse® HEDP), compared to pure NaOCl and the classic NaOCl + EDTA irrigating sequence, respectively. The surface tension of three irrigants was measured by Wilhelmy technique. To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the solutions, 26 human teeth were contaminated for 5 days with E. faecalis. After bacterial contamination, ten samples were irrigated with NaOCl followed by EDTA, another ten with NaOCl/Dual Rinse® HEDP, and four were used as positive controls. Two specimens not contaminated were used as negative controls. After live/dead BacLight staining, samples were examined by CLSM for analyzing % of residual live and dead cells. Comparison of bacterial viability between and within groups was performed using the Mann–Whitney test for independent samples and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively. The mean surface tension of EDTA was significantly lower than that of the other irrigants tested (p < 0.001). Conversely, the surface tension of NaOCl/Dual Rinse® HEDP solution was significantly higher than that of all the other solutions (p < 0.001). Residual bacterial viability in the NaOCl/Dual Rinse® HEDP (1.71%) was significantly lower (p = 0.019) than in the NaOCl + EDTA group (3.77%). All of the experimental groups showed significantly lower proportion of viable bacterial cells than the positive control group (p < 0.01). Clinical relevance adding etidronate to NaOCl increases its antimicrobial effect in dentinal tubules even though increases its surface tension.

Keywords

Antimicrobial activity Confocal laser scanning microscopy Etidronic acid Root canal irrigants Surface tension 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006;39:921–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siqueira JF, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008;34:1291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics. 2005;10:3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paquè F, Peters OA. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with the self-adjusting file. J Endod. 2011;37:517–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peters OA, Arias A, Paqué F. A micro-computed tomographic assessment of root canal preparation with a novel instrument, TRUShape, in mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2015;41:1545–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nair PNR, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:231–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jr Siqueira J F, Pérez AR, Marceliano-Alves MF, Provenzano JC, Silva SG, Pires FR, Vieira GCS, Rôças IN, Alves FRF. What happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analysis using micro-computed tomography and histology/scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J. 2018;51:501–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil J. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Topics. 2005;10:77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baker NA, Eleazer PD, Averbach RE, Seltzer S. Scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigation solutions. J Endod. 1975;1:127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giardino L, Ambu E, Becce C, Rimondini L, Morra M. Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic. J Endod. 2006;32:1091–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohammadi Z, Giardino L, Mombeinipour A. Antibacterial substantivity of a new antibiotic-based endodontic irrigation solution. Aust Endod J. 2012;38:26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, Espigares-Rodríguez E, Liébana-Ureña J, Espigares-García M. Bactericidal activity of phosphoric acid, citric acid, and EDTA solutions against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:84–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giardino L, Del Fabbro M, Cesario F, Fernandes FS, Andrade FB. Antimicrobial effectiveness of oxidant and chelating agents combination in infected dentine: an ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Int Endod J. 2018;51:448–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clarkson RM, Podlich HM, Moule AJ. Influence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the active chlorine content of sodium hypochlorite solutions when mixed in various proportions. J Endod. 2011;37:538–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zollinger A, Mohn D, Zeltner M, Zehnder M. Short-term storage stability of NaOCl solutions when combined with Dual Rinse HEDP. Int Endod J. 2018;51:691–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zehnder M, Schmidlin P, Sener B, Waltimo T. Chelation in root canal therapy reconsidered. J Endod. 2005;31:817–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lottanti S, Gautschi H, Sener B, Zehnder M. Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Int Endod J. 2009;42:335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arias-Moliz MT, Ordinola-Zapata R, Baca P, Ruiz-Linares M, Ferrer-Luque CM. Antimicrobial activity of a sodium hypochlorite/etidronic acid irrigant solution. J Endod. 2014;40:1999–2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morago A, Ordinola-Zapata R, Ferrer-Luque CM, Baca P, Ruiz-Linares M, Arias-Moliz MT. Influence of smear layer on the antimicrobial activity of a sodium hypochlorite/etidronic acid irrigating solution in infected dentin. J Endod. 2016;42:1647–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giardino L, Andrade FB, Beltrami R. Antimicrobial effect and surface tension of some chelating solutions with added surfactants. Braz Dent J. 2016;27:584–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morago A, Ruiz-Linares M, Ferrer-Luque CM, Baca P, Rodríguez Archilla A, Arias-Moliz MT. Dentine tubule disinfection by different irrigation protocols. Microsc Res Tech. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23200.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andrade FB, Arias MP, Maliza AG, Duarte MA, Graeff MS, Amoroso-Silva PA, Midena RZ, Moraes IG. A new improved protocol for in vitro intratubular dentinal bacterial contamination for antimicrobial endodontic tests: standardization and validation by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015;23:591–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ma J, Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. A new noninvasive model to study the effectiveness of dentin disinfection by using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Endod. 2011;37:1380–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Generali L, Campolongo E, Consolo U, Bertoldi C, Giardino L, Cavani F. Sodium hypochlorite penetration into dentinal tubules after manual dynamic agitation and ultrasonic activation: a histochemical evaluation. Odontology. 2018;106:454–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chávez de Paz LE. Image analysis software based on color segmentation for characterization of viability and physiological activity of biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:1734–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tartari T, Guimarães BM, Amoras LS, Duarte MA, Silva e Souza PA, Bramante CM. Etidronate causes minimal changes in the sodium hypochlorite ability to dissolve organic matter. Int Endod J. 2014;48:399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hsin WL, Sheng YJ, Lin SY, Tsao HK. Surface tension increment due to solute addition. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2004;69:031605.  https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.69.031605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giardino L, Estrela C, Mohammadi Z, Generali L, Asgary S. The in vitro effect of irrigants with low surface tension on Enterococcus faecalis. Iran Endod J. 2015;10:174–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang Z, Shen Y, Ma J, Haapasalo M. The effect of detergents on the antibacterial activity of disinfecting solutions in dentin. J Endod. 2012;38:948–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Farrugia C, Baca P, Camilleri J, Moliz AMT. Antimicrobial activity of ProRoot MTA in contact with blood. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41359.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Santos KR. Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J Endod. 2004;30:315–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tzanetakis GN, Azcarate-Peril MA, Zachaki S, Panopoulos P, Kontakiotis EG, Madianos PN, Divaris K. Comparison of bacterial community composition of primary and persistent endodontic infections using pyrosequencing. J Endod. 2015;41:1226–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Giardino L, Cavani F, Generali L. Sodium hypochlorite solution penetration into human dentine: a histochemical evaluation. Int Endod J. 2017;50:492–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Biel P, Mohn D, Attin T, Zehnder M. Interactions between the tetrasodium salts of EDTA and 1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonic acid with sodium hypochlorite irrigants. J Endod. 2017;43:657–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tawakoli PN, Ragnarsson KT, Rechenberg DK, Mohn D, Zehnder M. Effect of endodontic irrigants on biofilm matrix polysaccharides. Int Endod J. 2017;50:153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    de Almeida J, Hoogenkamp M, Felippe WT, Crielaard W, van der Waal SV. Effectiveness of EDTA and modified salt solution to detach and kill cells from Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J Endod. 2016;42:320–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    van der Waal SV, van der Sluis LW, Özok AR, Exterkate RA, van Marle J, Wesselink PR, de Soet JJ. The effects of hyperosmosis or high pH on a dual-species biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an in vitro study. Int Endod J. 2011;44:1110–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Freelance ResearcherCrotoneItaly
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental SciencesUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.IRCCS Orthopedic Institute GaleazziMilanItaly
  4. 4.NobilBio RicerchePortacomaroItaly
  5. 5.Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of DentistryUniversity of São PauloBauruBrazil
  6. 6.Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance (CHIMOMO)University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations