Advertisement

Odontology

pp 1–4 | Cite as

Respiratory rate is an inadequate parameter of ventilation in non-intubated sedation

  • Keiko Morimoto
  • Shin Ogura
  • Kenichiro Shinohara
  • Katsuhisa Sunada
Original Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

We compared the respiratory rate (RR) and transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (\({\text{Pt}}{{\text{c}}_{{\text{C}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}}}\)) during intravenous sedation (IVS), to determine whether RR is a useful parameter for monitoring ventilation. This was a prospective cohort study. The study sample comprised dental patients who received IVS via propofol or midazolam administration at Nippon Dental University Hospital. We simultaneously measured RR (through capnography), \({\text{Pt}}{{\text{c}}_{{\text{C}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}}}\) (using the \({\text{Pt}}{{\text{c}}_{{\text{C}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}}}\) monitor), and percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2). RR was the predictor and the outcome variable was \({\text{Pt}}{{\text{c}}_{{\text{C}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}}}\). Data were analyzed by Dunnett’s test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study sample consisted of 15 patients. No significant changes were identified in the RR and SpO2 measurements over time. However, \({\text{Pt}}{{\text{c}}_{{\text{C}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}}}\) values obtained from 20 to 40 min after induction of sedation were significantly higher than baseline values (P < 0.05). A correlation was found between RR and \({\text{Pt}}{{\text{c}}_{{\text{C}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}}}\) (P < 0.05), but the correlation coefficient was low (r = 0.22), indicating a weak correlation between these two factors. The results of this study suggest that RR is an inadequate parameter for monitoring ventilation during IVS; however, \({\text{Pt}}{{\text{c}}_{{\text{C}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}}}\) may be useful for monitoring.

Keywords

Intravenous sedation Non-intubated sedation Respiratory rate Transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the research staff at the Department of Dental Anesthesiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry, Tokyo, for their support. We would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Funding

This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Fu ES, Downs JB, Schweiger JW, Miguel RV, Smith RA. Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry. Chest. 2004;126:1552–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McEvedy BAB, McLeod ME, Mulera M, Kirpalani H, Lerman J. End-tidal, transcutaneous, and arterial pCO2 measurements in critically ill neonates: a comparative study. Anesthesiology. 1988;69:112–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abraham E, Smith M, Silver L. Continuous monitoring of critically ill patients with transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide and conjunctival oxygen sensors. Ann Emerg Med. 1984;13:1021–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bell JK, Laasch HU, Wilbraham L, England RE, Morris JA, Martin DF. Bispectral index monitoring for conscious sedation in intervention: better, safer, faster. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:1106–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bower AL, Ripepi A, Dilger J, Boparai N, Brody FJ, Ponsky JL. Bispectral index monitoring of sedation during endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:192–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL. Validity and reliability of the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;10:244–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sandler NA, Hodges J, Sabino M. Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59:603–11 (discussion 611-2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kwon MY, Lee SY, Kim TY, Kim DK, Lee KM, Woo NS, Chang YJ, Lee MA. Spectral entropy for assessing the depth of propofol sedation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;62:234–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bellman MH, Pleuvry BJ. Comparison of the respiratory effects of ICI 35 868 and thiopentone in the rabbit. Br J Anaesth. 1981;53:425–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor MB, Grounds RM, Mulroony PD, Morgan M. Ventilatory effects of propofol during induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1986;41:816–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gautier H, Gaudy JH. Changes in ventilatory pattern induced by intravenous anesthetic agents in human subjects. J Appl Physiol. 1978;45:171–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grounds RM, Maxwell DL, Talor MB, Aber V, Royston D. Acute ventilatory changes during i.v. induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol in man. Br J Anaesth. 1987;59:1098–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milic-Emili J, Zin WA. Breathing responses to imposed mechanical loads (Handbook of physiology, the respiratory system II). Washington, DC: American Physiology Society; 1986. pp. 751–69.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ponte J, Sadler CL. Effect of thiopentone, etomidate and propofol on carotid body chemoreceptor activity in the rabbit and the cat. Br J Anaesth. 1989;62:41–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goodman NW, Black AMS, Carter JA. Some ventilatory effects of propofol as sole anaesthetic agent. Br J Anaesth. 1978;59:1497–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zippi M, Traversa G, De Felici I, Febbraro I, Mattei E, Pietranico B, Sergio C, Sgarro MG, Occhigrossi G. Sedation with propofol in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: personal experience. Clin Ther. 2008;159:19–22.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keidan I, Gravenstein D, Berkenstadt H, Ziv A, Shavit I, Sidi A. Supplemental oxygen compromises the use of pulse oximetry for detection of apnea and hypoventilation during sedation in simulated pediatric patients. Pediatrics. 2008;122:293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ninomiya A, Matsuura N, Ichinohe T. Inhalation of 50% oxygen does not impair respiratory depression during midazolam sedation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:1932–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Dental AnesthesiologyThe Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Division of Oral ImplantNippon Dental University Hospital at TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations