Comparison of two color-difference formulas using the Bland–Altman approach based on gingiva color space
- 72 Downloads
The objectives of this study were to determine the relationship between the results provided by the classical CIELab (ΔEab*) and the CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) formulas and the gingival color space using the Bland and Altman limits of agreement, to use this relationship to establish the equivalences between the gingival color thresholds of perceptibility of both formulas, and to evaluate whether the relationship between ΔEab* and ΔE00 is modified depending on the axis in which the changes occur. The means of the L*, a*, and b* coordinates of the 21 gingiva porcelain samples (Heraceram, Heraeus Kulzer Mitsui Chemical Groups) were used and the differences in color were calculated in 210 pairs of samples using the CIELab (ΔE*ab) and CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) color-difference formulas. The results obtained with these formulas were compared and the limits of agreement after a logarithmic transformation of the data were obtained. The relationship between both formulas was ln ΔE00 = − 0.22 + ln ΔEab*. The results obtained with the CIELab formula were between 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.98–1.03) and 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.52–1.59) times higher than those obtained with the CIEDE200 formula. In the gingiva color space, the scale factor between the CIEDE2000 and CIELab values changes from 0.63 to 1.02, such that providing an accurate scale factor between both values proves difficult. The pairs with the highest ratio were those where the difference in color was mainly due to changes in lightness, whereas the pairs with the smallest ratio were those where the difference in color was mainly due to changes in the blue–yellow or green–red axes.
KeywordsGingiva color measurement CIEDE2000 formula CIELAB formula Bland and Altman limits of agreement
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Magne P, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: a biomimetic approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2002.Google Scholar
- 2.Fradeani M. Esthetic rehabilitation in fixed prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2007.Google Scholar
- 15.Schultze W, Gall L. Application of color difference formulae to highly saturated colors differing only in lightness and saturation. J Color Appear. 1971;1:17–24.Google Scholar
- 16.Schultze W. The usefulness of colour-difference formulae for fixing colour tolerances. Soesterberg: AIC; 1972. p. 245–65.Google Scholar
- 20.García PA, Huertas R, Melgosa M, Cui G. Measurement of the relationship between perceived and computed color differences. J Opt Soc Am. 2007;18:23–9.Google Scholar
- 26.Schnitzer S, Turp JC, Heydecke G. Color distribution and visual color assessment of human gingiva and mucosa: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:327–32.Google Scholar
- 29.Takeda T, Ishigami K, Shimada A, Ohki K. A study of discoloration of the gingiva by artificial crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:197–202.Google Scholar
- 33.Jung RE, Sailer I, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Res Dent. 2007;27:251–7.Google Scholar
- 34.Jung RE, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, Hämmerle CH. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008;28:357–65.Google Scholar
- 38.Happe A, Schulte-Mattler V, Fickl S, Naumann M, Zöller JE, Rothamel D. Spectrophotometric assessment of peri-implant mucosa after restoration with zirconia abutments veneered with fluorescent ceramic: a controlled, retrospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2013;24(100):28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Ishikawa-Nagai S, Sato R, Shiraishi A, Ishibashi K. Using a computer color-matching system in color reproduction of porcelain restorations. Part 3:a newly developed spectrophotometer designed for clinical application. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7:50–5.Google Scholar
- 46.Sharma G. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula. Excel spreadsheet implementation of the CIEDE2000 color-difference formula (including test data). Available at: http://www.ece.rochester.edu/~gsharma/ciede2000/.