Advertisement

Odontology

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 90–95 | Cite as

Effect of bite openings and mandibular protrusion on genioglossus muscle activity in healthy adults with oral appliance

  • Jianlan Long
  • Toru OgawaEmail author
  • Toshimi Ito
  • Michikazu Matsuda
  • Wei Li
  • Haiyang Yu
  • Keiichi Sasaki
Original Article

Abstract

Oral appliance (OA) can effectively treat obstructive sleep apnea; however, numerous types of oral appliances and designs are variable and the precise mechanisms behind differences in treatment outcomes are uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different degrees of mandibular position [4° of bite openings (BO): 2, 4, 8 and 12 mm; and protrusion (P): 0, 50%, MAX], for both the upright and supine positions: BO2 mm_P0%, BO4 mm_P0%, BO4 mm_P50%, BO4 mm_PMAX, BO8 mm_P0%, BO12 mm_P0%; with an OA on the: (1) activity of the genioglossus (GG) muscle by electromyogram, (2) inspiration by airflow sensor, and (3) recording mandibular movements (incisor and mandibular condyle point) in each position. Nine healthy male adults (age 27.5 ± 1.30 years) were recruited. The results show that GG muscle activity increased significantly from BO 4 mm_P0% to BO12 mm_P0% during the supine position, and the strongest signal was found in BO4 mm_PMAX, compared to all of the other positions, and GG muscle activity in BO4 mm_P0% tended to be lower. From supine to upright position the inspiration increased significantly but GG muscle activity did not. These results might be a stimulus to augment a compensatory mechanism of GG muscle induced by OA, however, mainly in protrusion position. The increase of BO (2–12 mm) and even maximum protrusion might not negatively affect the temporomandibular joint.

Keywords

Oral appliance Obstructive sleep apnea Genioglossus muscle Electromyogram Mandibular position 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Professor Peter A. Cistulli and Dr. Kate Sutherland from Centre for Sleep Health and Research, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia, and Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, for important scientific advice.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    George PT. Selecting sleep-disordered-breathing appliances. Biomechanical considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:339–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Otsuka R, Ono T, Honda E, Sasaki T, Kuroda T. Effect of titrated mandibular advancement and jaw opening on the upper airway in nonapneic men: a magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;125:191–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsuiki S, Ono T, Kuroda T. Mandibular advancement modulates respiratory-related genioglossus electromyographic activity. Sleep Breath. 2000;4:53–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ogawa T, Long J, Sutherland K, Chan AS, Sasaki K, Cistulli PA. Effect of mandibular advancement splint treatment on tongue shape in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2015;19:857–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rose E, Staats R, Virchow C, Jonas IE. A comparative study of two mandibular advancement appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:191–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vroegop AV, Vanderveken OM, Van de Heyning PH, Braem MJ. Effects of vertical opening on pharyngeal dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Sleep Med. 2012;13:314–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nikolopoulou M, Naeije M, Aarab G, Hamburger HL, Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F. The effect of raising the bite without mandibular protrusion on obstructive sleep apnoea. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:643–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pitsis AJ, Darendeliler MA, Gotsopoulos H, Petocz P, Cistulli PA. Effect of vertical dimension on efficacy of oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:860–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alonso JF, Mañanas MA, Rojas M, Bruce EN. Coordination of respiratory muscles assessed by means of nonlinear forecasting of demodulated myographic signals. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21:1064–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Okawara Y, Tsuiki S, Hiyama S, Hashimoto K, Ono T, Ohyama K. Oral appliance titration and nasal resistance in nonapneic subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126:620–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doble EA, Leiter JC, Knuth SL, Daubenspeck JA, Bartlett D Jr. A noninvasive intraoral electromyographic electrode for genioglossus muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1985;58:1378–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mezzanotte WS, Tangel DJ, White DP. Waking genioglossal electromyogram in sleep apnea patients versus normal controls (a neuromuscular compensatory mechanism). J Clin Invest. 1992;89:1571–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meurice JC, Marc I, Carrier G, Sériès F. Effects of mouth opening on upper airway collapsibility in normal sleeping subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:255–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee CH, Kim DK, Kim SY, Rhee CS, Won TB. Changes in site of obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea patients according to sleep position: a DISE study. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:248–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianlan Long
    • 1
    • 2
  • Toru Ogawa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Toshimi Ito
    • 1
  • Michikazu Matsuda
    • 1
  • Wei Li
    • 2
  • Haiyang Yu
    • 2
  • Keiichi Sasaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Advanced Prosthetic DentistryTohoku University Graduate School of DentistrySendaiJapan
  2. 2.West China School of StomatologySichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations