Advertisement

Odontology

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 192–198 | Cite as

Properties of indirect composites reinforced with monomer-impregnated glass fiber

  • Naomi Tanoue
  • Takashi Sawase
  • Hideo Matsumura
  • John F. McCabe
Original Article

Abstract

Sufficient flexural strength is required for long-term clinical use of fixed partial dentures made with fiber-reinforced composite. The flexural strengths of indirect composite materials reinforced with a monomer-preimpregnated glass fiber material were determined to evaluate the compatibility of the composites to glass fiber material. Four types (microhybrid, nanohybrid, microfilled, and minifilled) of indirect composites and a unidirectional long glass fiber material were selected for investigation. The composites were placed on a fiber plate and polymerized in accordance with the respective manufacturer’s instructions. Rectangular bar fiber–composite specimens were machined and the flexural strength was calculated. The flexural strength of each indirect composite was also measured. The microfilled composite with the lowest filler content (70 wt%) exhibited the highest increase ratio using the fiber, although its strength without fiber reinforcement was the lowest (62.1 MPa). The fiber–microhybrid specimen demonstrated the highest mean strength (355.9 MPa), although the filler content of the microhybrid composite was comparatively low (73 wt%). The type of composite material should be considered for the selection of an optimal fiber–composite combination.

Keywords

Fiber-reinforced composite Filler content Flexural strength Glass fiber Indirect composite 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research B (18390525), for Scientific C (20592302), and for Scientific C (23592858) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

References

  1. 1.
    Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Development and clinical applications of a light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:311–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vallittu PK, Sevelius C. Resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:413–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vallittu PK. Case report: a glass fiber reinforced composite resin bonded fixed partial denture. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2001;9:35–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Göhring TN, Schmidlin PR, Lutz F. Two-year clinical and SEM evaluation of glass-fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures. Am J Dent. 2002;15:35–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vallittu PK. Survival rates of resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures with a mean follow-up of 42 months: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:241–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cenci MS, Rodolpho PA, Pereira-Cenci T, Del Bel Cury AA, Demarco FF. Fixed partial dentures in an up to 8-year follow-up. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18:364–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soares CJ, Barbosa LM, Santana FR, Soares PB, Mota AS, Silva GR. Fracture strength of composite fixed partial denture using bovine teeth as a substitute for human teeth with or without fiber-reinforcement. Braz Dent J. 2010;21:235–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aida N, Shinya A, Yokoyama D, Lassila LV, Gomi H, Vallittu PK, Shinya A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of posterior fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial denture Part 2: influence of fiber reinforcement on mesial and distal connectors. Dent Mater J. 2011;30:29–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Altieri JV, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ, Patel AP. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced fixed partial dentures: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:16–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jokstad A, Gökçe M, Hjortsjö C. A systematic review of the scientific documentation of fixed partial dentures made from fiber-reinforced polymer to replace missing teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18:489–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Behr M, Rosentritt M, Taubenhansl P, Kolbeck C, Handel G. Fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced composite restorations with different framework design. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005;63:153–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ootaki M, Shin-ya A, Gomi H, Shin-ya A, Nakasone Y. Optimum design for fixed partial dentures made of hybrid resin with glass fiber reinforcement by finite element analysis: effect of vertical reinforced thickness on fiber frame. Dent Mater J. 2007;26:80–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waki T, Nakamura T, Nakamura T, Kinuta S, Wakabayashi K, Yatani H. Fracture resistance of inlay-retained fixed partial dentures reinforced with fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater J. 2006;25:1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xie Q, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Comparison of load-bearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite FPDs with four framework designs. J Dent. 2007;35:578–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ozcan M, Breuklander MH, Vallittu PK. The effect of box preparation on the strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:337–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Use of short-reinforced composite with semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix in fixed partial dentures. J Dent. 2007;35:403–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. Repair bond strength of restorative resin composite applied to fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004;62:51–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Waki T, Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K, Mutobe Y, Yatani H. Adhesive strength between fiber-reinforced composites and veneering composites and fracture load of combinations of these materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:364–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pfeiffer P, Grube L. Effect of pontic height on the fracture strength of reinforced interim fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater. 2006;22:1093–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bae JM, Kim KN, Hattori M, Hasegawa K, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, Oda Y. The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:33–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:485–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakamura T, Ohyama T, Waki T, Kinuta S, Wakabayashi K, Takano N, Yatani H. Finite element analysis of fiber-reinforced fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater J. 2005;24:275–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Segerström S, Meriç G, Knarvang T, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of two matrix materials intended for fiber-reinforced polymers. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:422–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karbhari VM, Strassler H. Effect of fiber architecture on flexural characteristics and fracture of fiber-reinforced dental composites. Dent Mater. 2007;23:960–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994;125:687–701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Izumida A, Tomoda K, Kimura K, Komatsu M, Okuno O. Rheological study of hard resin for crown and bridge. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc. 2006;50:396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mitobe C, Shin-ya A, Gomi H, Shin-ya A. Evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite resins using JIS and ISO bending test methods. J Dent Mater. 2006;25:281–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry—polymer-based crown and bridge materials. ISO 10477 1992; 1992(E).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ide T, Yanagida H, Hisamatsu N, Tanoue N, Murata H, Matsumura H. Shear bond strength of four indirect composites to a monomer-impregnated glass fiber material. Adhes Dent. 2008;26:112–7.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rodrigues SA Jr, Scherrer SS, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Flexural strength and Weibull analysis of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3- and 4-point bending tests. Dent Mater. 2008;24:426–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tanimoto Y, Kitagawa T, Aida M, Nishiyama N. Experimental and computational approach for evaluating the mechanical characteristics of dental composite resins with various filler sizes. Acta Biomater. 2006;2:633–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:358–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tanoue N, Shimoe S, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Application of a preliminary light-curing unit for enhanced bonding between a gold alloy and veneering materials. Am J Dent. 2005;18:82–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naomi Tanoue
    • 1
  • Takashi Sawase
    • 2
  • Hideo Matsumura
    • 3
  • John F. McCabe
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of General DentistryNagasaki University HospitalNagasakiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Applied ProsthodonticsNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasakiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Fixed ProsthodonticsNihon University School of DentistryTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Dental Materials Science Unit, School of Dental SciencesUniversity of Newcastle upon TyneNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations