Odontology

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 109–114 | Cite as

Relative efficiency of radiation sources for photopolymerization

  • Rie Nomoto
  • John F. McCabe
  • Keiko Nitta
  • Susumu Hirano
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of new-generation light-emitting diode (LED) units in comparison with the conventional tungsten-halogen, plasma arc, and first-generation LED units reported in our previous study. The irradiance of light from new-generation LED units, the temperature rise of the bovine enamel surface, and the depth of cure of composites exposed to each unit were investigated. The irradiances in the range 400–515 nm emitted from the new-generation LED units were greater than those from the first-generation LED units. The temperature increase was 15–25°C for new-generation LED units compared with a typical value of 5°C for the first-generation LED units at 10 s of irradiation. The relationship between the depth of cure and the logarithm of total exposure energy suggested that LED units can cure light-cured composite resins more efficiently than tungsten-halogen or plasma arc units.

Key words

LED-curing unit Light source Irradiance Depth of cure Temperature rise 

References

  1. 1.
    Nomoto R, Uchida K, Moriyama K, Hirasawa T. Changes in light intensity with time on light curing units. Dent Mater 1998;17:62–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nitta K. Effect of light guide tip diameter of LED-light curing unit on polymerisation of light-cured composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:217–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF. The influence of light exposure on polymerization of dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 1993;18:48–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Myers ML, Caughman WF, Bruynooghe W. Effect of restoration composition shade, and thickness on the cure of a photo activated resin cement. J Prosthodont 1994;3:149–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a lightcured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 1991;70:72–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eliades G. In vitro characterization of visible light-cured glass ionomer liners. Dent Mater 1993;9:198–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weinberger SJ, Wright GZ. A survey of sealant use by Canadian dental practitioners. J Int Assoc Dent Child 1990;20:42–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rock WP, Evans RI. A comparative study between a chemically polymerised fissure sealant resin and a light-cured resin. Threeyear results. Br Dent J 1983;155:344–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miyazaki M, Hinoura H, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of light irradiation of dentine primers on dentine-resin bond. J Dent 1995;23:371–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shintani H, Inoue T, Yamaki M. Analysis of camphorquinone in visible light-cured composite resins. Dent Mater 1985;1:124–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan KC, Boyer DB. Curing light-activated composite cement through porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:476–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Dual-cure luting composites. Part 1: filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:133–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Council on Dental Materials Devices. American Dental Association Guidelines on the use of ultraviolet radiation in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;92:775–6.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Birdsell DC, Bannon PJ, Webb PB. Harmful effects of near ultraviolet radiation used for polymerization of a sealant and a composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;94:311–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;19:515–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nomoto R, McCabe JF, Hirasawa T. Comparison of halogen, plasma and LED curing units. Oper Dent 2004;29:287–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISO-Standards. ISO TS 10650. Dental equipment-powered polymerisation activators Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1999.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCabe JF, Carrick TE. Output from visible-light activation units and depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 1989;68:1534–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ISO-Standards. ISO 4049. Dentistry-resin-based filling materials. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1988.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cook WD. Factors affecting the depth of cure of UV-polymerized composites. J Dent Mater 1980;59:800–8.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cook WD. Curing efficiency and ocular hazards of dental photopolymerization sources. Biomaterials 1986;7:449–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nomoto R, Uchida K, Hirasawa T. Effect of light intensity on polymerization of light-cured composite resins. Dent Mater J 1994;13:198–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nomoto R. Effect of light wavelength on polymerization of lightcured resins. Dent Mater J 1997;16:60–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rie Nomoto
    • 1
  • John F. McCabe
    • 2
  • Keiko Nitta
    • 1
  • Susumu Hirano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Dental EngineeringTsurumi University School of Dental MedicineYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Restorative Dentistry, The Dental SchoolUniversity of Newcastle upon TyneFramlington PlaceUK

Personalised recommendations