Advertisement

Odontology

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 103–108 | Cite as

Evaluation of two dual-functional primers and a tribochemical surface modification system applied to the bonding of an indirect composite resin to metals

  • Hiroaki Yanagida
  • Naomi TanoueEmail author
  • Takako Ide
  • Hideo Matsumura
Original Article

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of two dual-functional primers and a tribochemical surface modification system on the bond strength between an indirect composite resin and gold alloy or titanium. Disk specimens (diameter, 10 mm; thickness, 2.5 mm) were cast from type 4 gold alloy and commercially pure titanium. The specimens were wetground to a final surface finish using 600-grit silicone carbide paper. The specimens were then air-dried and treated using the following four bonding systems: (1) air-abrasion with 50–70 μm alumina, (2) system 1 + alloy primer, (3) system 1 + metal link primer, and (4) tribochemical silica/silane coating (Rocatec). A light-polymerizing indirect composite resin (Ceramage) was applied to each metal specimen and polymerized according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Shear bond strengths (MPa) were determined both before and after thermocycling (4°C and 60°C for 1 min each for 20 000 cycles). The values were compared using analysis of variance, post hoc Scheffe tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests (alpha = 0.05). The strengths decreased after thermocycling for all combinations. For both gold alloy and titanium, the bond strength with air-abrasion only was statistically lower than that with the other three modification methods after thermocycling. Titanium exhibited a significantly higher value (13.4 MPa) than gold alloy (10.5 MPa) with the air. abrasion and alloy primer system. Treatment with the tribochemical system or air abrasion followed by treatment with dual-functional priming agents was found to be effective for enhancement of the bonding between the indirect composite and gold alloy or titanium.

Key words

Bond strength Gold alloy Titanium Primer Silica coating 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tanaka T, Nagata K, Takeyama M, Atsuta M, Nakabayashi N, Masuhara E. 4-META opaque resin — a new resin strongly adhesive to nickel-chromium alloy. J Dent Res 1981;60:1697–706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Silicoating: evaluation of new method of bonding composite resin to metal. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:171–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kolodney H, Puckett AD, Brown K. Shear strength of laboratoryprocessed composite resins bonded to a silane-coated nickel chromium-beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:419–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hansson O, Moberg LE. Evaluation of three silicoating methods for resin-bonded prostheses. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:243–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kourtis SG. Bond strengths of resin-to-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:136–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moulin P, Degrange M, Picard B. Influence of surface treatment on adherence energy of alloys used in bonded prosthetics. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:413–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsumura H, Shimoe S, Nagano K, Atsuta M. Effect of noble metal conditioners on bonding between prosthetic composite material and silver-palladium-copper-gold alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:710–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petridis H, Hirayama H, Kugel G, Habib C, Garefis P. Shear bond strength of techniques for bonding esthetic veneers to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:608–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsumura H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strength of composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:315–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yanagida H, Matsumura H, Taira Y, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:121–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Behr M, Rosentritt M, Groger G, Handel G. Adhesive bond of veneering composites on various metal surface using silicoating, titanium-coating or functional monomers. J Dent 2003;31:33–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shimoe S, Tanoue N, Yanagida H, Atsuta M, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Comparative strength of metal-ceramic and metalcomposite bonds after extended thermocycling. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:689–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amano S, Yoshida T, Inage H, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Ando S, Kuroda T, Miyazaki M. Effect of metal conditioner application on bond strength of luting cements to a noble metal. Dent Mater J 2005;24:654–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Damerau G. Spark erosion as a metal-resin bonding system. Dent Mater 2007;23:193–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takayama Y, Takishin N, Tsuchida F, Hosoi T. Survey on use of titanium dentures in Tsurumi University Dental Hospital for 11 years. J Prosthodontic Res 2009;53:53–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones RM, Goodacre CJ, Moore BK, Dykema RW. A comparison of the physical properties of four prosthetic veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:38–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee CF, Pierpont HP, Strickler ER. The effect of bead attachment systems on casting patterns and resultant tensile bond strength of composite resin veneer cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:623–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Properties of a new photoactivated composite polymerized with three different laboratory photo-curing units. J Oral Rehabil 2003;80:832–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Paula AB, Duque C, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani RM. Effect of restorative technique and thermal/mechanical treatment on marginal adaptation and compressive strength of esthetic restorations. Oper Dent 2008;33:434–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. Laboratory evaluation of a metalpriming agent for adhesive bonding. Quintessence Int 2000;31:749–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry-polymer based crown and bridge materials Amendment 1. ISO 10477: 1992/Amd.1:1998(E).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Watanabe I, Kurtz KS, Kabcenell JL, Okabe T. Effect of sandblasting and silicacoating on bond strength of polymer-glass composite to cast titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:462–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mukai M, Fukui H, Hasegawa J. Relationship between sandblasting and composite resin-alloy bond strength by a silica coating. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:151–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Özcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:155–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    May KB, Fox J, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Silane to enhance the bond between polymethyl methacrylate and titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:428–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of five silane coupling agents on the bond strength of a luting cement to silicacoated titanium. Dent Mater 2007;23:1173–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Adhesive bonding of titanium with a titanate coupler and 4-META/MMA-TBB opaque resin. J Dent Res 1990;69:1614–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Atta MO, Smith BG, Brown D. Bond strength of three chemical adhesive cements adhered to a nickel-chromium alloy for direct bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:137–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Fracture resistance of composite and amalgam cores retained by pins coated with new adhesive resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:752–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Atsuta M, Matsumura H, Tanaka T. Bonding prosthodontic composite resin and precious metal alloys with the use of a vinyl-thiol primer and an adhesive opaque resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:296–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matsumura H, Kamada K, Tanoue N, Atsuta M. Effect of thione primers on bonding of noble metal alloys with an adhesive resin. J Dent 2000;28:287–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koizumi H, Furuchi M, Tanoue N, Yanagida H, Yoneyama T, Matsumura H. Bond strength to primed Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy of two acrylic resin adhesives. Dent Mater J 2006;25:286–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mori K, Nakamura Y. Study on triazine thiols. V. Polymerization of 6-(4-vinylbenzyl propyl) amino-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-dithiol on copper plates and their corrosion resistance. J Polym Sci Polym Lett Ed 1983;21:889–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kojima K. Studies on adhesion of functional monomers with SH group to tooth substrates and dental alloys. J Jpn Dent Mater 1986;5:92–105.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Suzuki M, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Hisamitsu H, Kojima K, Kadoma Y. A study on the adsorption structure of an adhesive monomer for precious metals by surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy. Biomaterials 1999;20:839–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Suzuki M, Yamamoto M, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Hisamitsu H, Kojima K, Kadoma Y. Raman and IR studies on adsorption behavior of adhesive monomers in a metal primer for Au, Ag, Cu, and Cr surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:37–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ohno H, Araki Y, Sagara M. The adhesion mechanism of dental adhesive resin to the alloy - relationship between Co-Cr alloy surface structure analyzed by ESCA and bonding strength of adhesive resin. Dent Mater J 1986;5:46–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Effect of acidic primer on bonding between stainless steel and auto-polymerizing methacrylic resins. J Dent 1997;25:285–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ishikawa Y, Kawamoto Y, Nemoto M, Koizumi H, Nemoto K, Matsumura H. Effect of acidic primers on bonding three magnetic steel alloys with tri-n-butylborane initiated methacrylic resin. Dent Mater J 2005;24:530–5.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tsuchimoto Y, Yoshida Y, Mine A, Nakamura M, Nishiyama N, Van Meerbeek B, Suzuki K, Kuboki T. Effect of 4-MET- and 10-MDP-based primers on resin bonding to titanium. Dent Mater J 2006;25:382–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ishii T, Koizumi H, Yoneyama T, Tanoue N, Ishikawa Y, Matsumura H. Comparative evaluation of thione and phosphate monomers on bonding gold alloy and Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy with tri-nbutylborane initiated resin. Dent Mater J 2008;27:56–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shimizu H, Tsue F, Chen ZX, Kawaguchi T, Takahashi Y. Bonding of autopolymerizing acrylic resins to magnetic stainless steel alloys using metal conditioner. J Dent 2008;36:138–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroaki Yanagida
    • 1
  • Naomi Tanoue
    • 2
    Email author
  • Takako Ide
    • 1
  • Hideo Matsumura
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Applied ProsthodonticsNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasakiJapan
  2. 2.Division of General DentistryNagasaki University Hospital of Medicine and DentistryNagasakiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Fixed ProsthodonticsNihon University School of DentistryTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations